| Author |
Message |
jimbo_jones

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 4361 Location: gong
Vehicle: 2015 Jimny, LJ50, Maruti
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 12:39 am |
|
my mate is changing his clutch in his 88 sierra he has a mk 1 GTI motor in it with the std GTI flywheel and has a std flywheel out of a sierra it came of a G13A the sierra flywheel is bigger than the gti one and starter wont fit he wants to use the sierra flywheel as it should give me more toque down low due to being heavier.
the questions he has is :
1 dose he just need a starter out of a G13A to to make this work
2 dose he need the backing plate of the G13a As well the one that locates the starter motor
3 I there anything eles he needs to know?
thanks for any help
heres some pics of the 2 flywheels

|
|
|
|
 |
royce

omnipotent being
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 17216 Location: Pluto
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 12:47 am |
|
|
was this a running setup?
BTW a heavier flywheel with give you more of nothing!!!!!! excpet maybe a smoother idle
that like saying water in your tyres will make you go faster
|
|
|
|
 |
Brett

az supporter
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 1791 Location: Central coast NSW
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 1:21 am |
|
|
sorry royce but a heavier fly wheel well make it feel like you have more low down toque and the engine will pull better down low, its to do with the rotation of mass. once some thing heavier is going it take less to keep it spinning.
its why hill climb racers don't lighten there fly wheels and circuit races do. the heavier fly wheel helps make the car pull from lower in the rev range and in hill climbing you want more toque to push you you the hill.
i had a gemini years ago that i took to a open day hill climb in canberra. it didn't go to well and every one i spoke to told me to take out the lighten fly wheel and chuck it in the bin before i do anything to the car.
|
|
|
|
 |
jimbo_jones

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 4361 Location: gong
Vehicle: 2015 Jimny, LJ50, Maruti
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 1:28 am |
|
royce wrote: was this a running setup?
BTW a heavier flywheel with give you more of nothing!!!!!! excpet maybe a smoother idle
that like saying water in your tyres will make you go faster
yeah was running with the std gti flywheel
as said the sierra flywheel gives more low down tuque better for rock crawling
|
|
|
|
 |
royce

omnipotent being
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 17216 Location: Pluto
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 1:39 am |
|
Brett wrote: sorry royce but a heavier fly wheel well make it feel like you have more low down toque and the engine will pull better down low, its to do with the rotation of mass. once some thing heavier is going it take less to keep it spinning.
its why hill climb racers don't lighten there fly wheels and circuit races do. the heavier fly wheel helps make the car pull from lower in the rev range and in hill climbing you want more toque to push you you the hill.
i had a gemini years ago that i took to a open day hill climb in canberra. it didn't go to well and every one i spoke to told me to take out the lighten fly wheel and chuck it in the bin before i do anything to the car.
that is utter bullshit, heard of Kinetic energy?
so if I go and weld 2 flywheels together I should be careful I dont start snapping axles and doing big wheelies everywhere from all teh awsome torque?
the crank has to turn it, heavier flywheel takes more effort to turn, that effort doesnt get to the wheels so you go slower or need more pedal for the same acceleration, there is a way to calculate what removing rotational mass is equiv to in terms of static weight removal but its complex so a rule of thumb is someting like X4
all it will do is help when you need the extra rotational mass, like at idle when the power pulses are further apart so the mass helps smooth it over
and to keep harping on what you posted, yep heavy mass is easier to keep turning at a constant speed but it still always takes more power
|
|
|
|
 |
jimbo_jones

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 4361 Location: gong
Vehicle: 2015 Jimny, LJ50, Maruti
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 1:49 am |
|
|
can anyone answer the original Q?
|
|
|
|
 |
Built4thrashing
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 4972 Location: Dandenong .Vic
Vehicle: 1999 GV. Locked and Lifted
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 1:51 am |
|
|
i wish someone had told the early steam engine builders they didnt need such heavy fly wheels. could have saved them alor of expense in all that un-necessary matal spinning the belt drive equipment.
Heavier spinning mass will help low end a bit but not as much as you think. It will help with keeping thing moving for longer but will do little for performance as it takes more power to get it spinning.
An engine with a lighter flywheel will rev faster than one with a heavy fly wheel but it will also slow down quicker as there is less spinning mass.
B4T
|
|
|
|
 |
Brett

az supporter
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 1791 Location: Central coast NSW
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 1:59 am |
|
|
maybe i worded it wrong, it won't give you more power it will let you use more down lower in the rev range so it will feel like you have more.
a friend down there put a lightened flywheel in his 350 corvette (had a big cam, head work, stroker crank. was a cranky street engine) and it was even more of a pig to drive and wouldn't idle under 1500 with the light fly wheel and would stall all the time. he hated it and gave the wheel away.
i never got back to the hill cimb track to compare times but did change the flywheel. on a hill on the monaro hwy just near rose cottage (any one in ACT will know it) with the lighten fly wheel i had to change down to 4th to keep on 100 with the std fly wheel it sat on 100 in 5th no worries. car was slower over 1/4 mile but was easier to drive and didn't bog down if i wasn't reving it to where the cam came in.
|
|
|
|
 |
royce

omnipotent being
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 17216 Location: Pluto
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 1:59 am |
|
is the small flywheel flat or stepped?
is the big flywheel flat or stepped?
does the old pressure plate fit the bigger flywheel?
does the bigger flywheel fit inside the bellhousing?
AFAIK you use the sierra flywheel in a GTI conversion anyway, and a gti uses the same clutch as one of the WT ones, I cant remember how 'fat' a sierra flywheel is but sure tis not a vit flywheel you have there? they are pretty chunky (must be why vits accelerate faster than sierras  )
|
|
|
|
 |
Mike

lesspostingmorewheeling
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 2236 Location: Under Down Under
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 2:05 am |
|
|
that does look a bit thick of a sierra flywheel from memory
_________________ [quote="Fluffy"] yeah right mate like Im gunna mov
|
|
|
|
 |
jimbo_jones

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 4361 Location: gong
Vehicle: 2015 Jimny, LJ50, Maruti
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 2:19 am |
|
|
na came of G13A sierra N/T
|
|
|
|
 |
Mike

lesspostingmorewheeling
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 2236 Location: Under Down Under
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 2:37 am |
|
|
i just went to look at my nt motor and flywheel and its definatly thinner than the one you got there but it is thicker than the gti one
_________________ [quote="Fluffy"] yeah right mate like Im gunna mov
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 10:52 am |
|
Hey you bunch of sandy vag's
Read this
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 3:37 pm |
|
royce wrote: that is utter bullshit, heard of Kinetic energy?
so if I go and weld 2 flywheels together I should be careful I dont start snapping axles and doing big wheelies everywhere from all teh awsome torque?
the crank has to turn it, heavier flywheel takes more effort to turn, that effort doesnt get to the wheels so you go slower or need more pedal for the same acceleration, there is a way to calculate what removing rotational mass is equiv to in terms of static weight removal but its complex so a rule of thumb is someting like X4
all it will do is help when you need the extra rotational mass, like at idle when the power pulses are further apart so the mass helps smooth it over
and to keep harping on what you posted, yep heavy mass is easier to keep turning at a constant speed but it still always takes more power
LMFAO its amassing every time i read anything of yours i laugh more and start to believe that you were borne in a cave.... where did you get your understanding of scientific principals???? play school??? ok mister wise arse.. if a fly wheel makes NO difference  why is the sierra one twice as think as a G13A swift? what they just had a gap to fill up?????
for those who need to know, u will need to use the sierra flywheel  , this way everything lines up as it should, the gti has a MUCH smaller imput shaft in the gearbox!
also my zook has SO much more drivability down low with the gti motor and heavy fly wheel than my mates that is gti fly! his just rev's harder!
so the long and the short, sacrifice a bit of top end 7K+ and run the sierra fly! u will love it!
LOL
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
royce

omnipotent being
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 17216 Location: Pluto
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 4:03 pm |
|
jonno_racing wrote: royce wrote: that is utter bullshit, heard of Kinetic energy?
so if I go and weld 2 flywheels together I should be careful I dont start snapping axles and doing big wheelies everywhere from all teh awsome torque?
the crank has to turn it, heavier flywheel takes more effort to turn, that effort doesnt get to the wheels so you go slower or need more pedal for the same acceleration, there is a way to calculate what removing rotational mass is equiv to in terms of static weight removal but its complex so a rule of thumb is someting like X4
all it will do is help when you need the extra rotational mass, like at idle when the power pulses are further apart so the mass helps smooth it over
and to keep harping on what you posted, yep heavy mass is easier to keep turning at a constant speed but it still always takes more power
LMFAO its amassing every time i read anything of yours i laugh more and start to believe that you were borne in a cave.... where did you get your understanding of scientific principals???? play school??? ok mister wise arse.. if a fly wheel makes NO difference  why is the sierra one twice as think as a G13A swift? what they just had a gap to fill up????? for those who need to know, u will need to use the sierra flywheel  , this way everything lines up as it should, the gti has a MUCH smaller imput shaft in the gearbox! also my zook has SO much more drivability down low with the gti motor and heavy fly wheel than my mates that is gti fly! his just rev's harder! so the long and the short, sacrifice a bit of top end 7K+ and run the sierra fly! u will love it! LOL
Why have you not crawled into a hole and died yet moron?
I notice you didnt put 2 and 2 together yet and see where I asked if it was a running conversion yet cause just like you said you have to use the sierra flywheel.
And its heavier cause it smooths things out down low and allows for a lower idle cumstain, I never said there wasnt advantages to a heavier flywheel, only that there is no way known it will give you more torque
Congratulations for being probably the least intelligent person most of us will come across this year 
|
|
|
|
 |
Mike

lesspostingmorewheeling
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 2236 Location: Under Down Under
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 5:53 pm |
|
|
i love these sort of threads lol
_________________ [quote="Fluffy"] yeah right mate like Im gunna mov
|
|
|
|
 |
jimbo_jones

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 4361 Location: gong
Vehicle: 2015 Jimny, LJ50, Maruti
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 9:27 pm |
|
|
So is it that all thats needed is the sierra starter out of the g13a to make this work?
|
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14499 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 9:36 pm |
|
jimbo_jones wrote: So is it that all thats needed is the sierra starter out of the g13a to make this work?
sierra flywheel, sierra starter. at least i recon it would be.
might be a case of find a starter and shove it in the hole and see if it works. 
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 10:26 pm |
|
|
jimbo mate pm me.. i iwill give you my mobile number and u can call me if you like.
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
jimbo_jones

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 4361 Location: gong
Vehicle: 2015 Jimny, LJ50, Maruti
|
 Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 2:34 am |
|
|
thanks shep will let my mate know
|
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14499 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 2:38 am |
|
don't take my thoughts as gospel though cos i am only guessing. 
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 3:32 am |
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 10:47 am |
|
jonno_racing wrote: cool, just totaly ignore the guy who JUST did the conversion.
Just post it up on here so if someone else wants to do the conversion later down the track and does a search the info will be here.
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 2:08 pm |
|
Damo wrote: jonno_racing wrote: cool, just totaly ignore the guy who JUST did the conversion. Just post it up on here so if someone else wants to do the conversion later down the track and does a search the info will be here.
honesty i don't think i can be bothered.
want to know how??? LEARN IT YOUR FRACKING SELF!
i am just totaly amazed at the attitude and stupidity of some people on the internet.
i don't think i will bother posting stuff in tech, i will leave it to the people who know NOTHING and pretend to know everything.
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 2:41 pm |
|
Thanks for nothing 
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14499 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 2:47 pm |
|
jonno_racing wrote: Damo wrote: jonno_racing wrote: cool, just totaly ignore the guy who JUST did the conversion. Just post it up on here so if someone else wants to do the conversion later down the track and does a search the info will be here. honesty i don't think i can be bothered. want to know how??? LEARN IT YOUR FRACKING SELF! i am just totaly amazed at the attitude and stupidity of some people on the internet. i don't think i will bother posting stuff in tech, i will leave it to the people who know NOTHING and pretend to know everything.
fair dinkem mate, what is your fucken story. you come across as a fucking
spoiled little child. if you don't like the site why keep coming back.
the time it took you to type this shit you could have answered the question.
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 3:38 pm |
|
jonno_racing wrote: for those who need to know, u will need to use the sierra flywheel , this way everything lines up as it should, the gti has a MUCH smaller imput shaft in the gearbox!
i already did.
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
jimbo_jones

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 4361 Location: gong
Vehicle: 2015 Jimny, LJ50, Maruti
|
 Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 3:46 pm |
|
|
I all ready know you can yes the sierra fly wheel and it's better for it if you go back and look at the orginal post before every one had there rant mabye you would know what I was asking
|
|
|
|
 |
Brett

az supporter
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 1791 Location: Central coast NSW
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:19 am |
|
|
sorry we all got off topic.
he will need the backing plate, starter and fly wheel of the sierra. that way every thing matches up.
if you use the gti flywheel and sierra starter the ring gear teeth probably wont engage.
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 5:55 pm |
|
|
yes to all. you will need sierra everything
mine never actulay had a backing plate in it. and it works fine.
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
|