| auszookers.com http://auszookers.com/forum/ |
|
| NT LWB Zook http://auszookers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=23310 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | TryHard [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | NT LWB Zook |
long story short mates got a NT LWB Zook .. wants to make it into a Budget weekend weapon info Engine size 1.0 currently on 30 inch tyres ideal spending 2k ish My ideas Put a set of WT axles onto it and Tranfer Gearing .. maby 5.1 2 inch lift maby 2 inch body .. Twin auto lockers or maby just rear anyone see anyproblems with this setup ? thanks ideas welcome 
|
|
| Author: | Ben_Sierra [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
What size tyres are you planning on running? |
|
| Author: | steak_knife [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
TryHard wrote: l
anyone see anyproblems with this setup ? thanks ideas welcome To low geared for std trye's.... 2in sping lift, transfer gear's, twin locked & w/t = weapon!!!!! |
|
| Author: | TryHard [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
atm hes running 30 .. he might go 31s .. maby 33s .. not to sure problems is im trying not to gear it to low .. maby forget the ring and pinion change and just go 5.1 transgears ? |
|
| Author: | Ben_Sierra [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
Pretty low for even 31s, especially in high range... |
|
| Author: | TryHard [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
ok Just edited the first post does that sound better ? |
|
| Author: | Fatzook [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
Ben_Sierra wrote: Pretty low for even 31s, especially in high range...
Its a 1L. |
|
| Author: | Ben_Sierra [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
Ah true... Still would be a little on the low side with those diff gears I'd have thought... |
|
| Author: | Fatzook [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
Ben_Sierra wrote: Ah true...
Still would be a little on the low side with those diff gears I'd have thought... Really? It has 4.1's now. And WT's are 3.7's so that makes it taller. Then you add the 5.1 transfer gears which are only 6% lower than the standard 1L case in Hi, and I'd say he need more gearing, not less. For 30-31's and a 1L motor You should aim for 6.5 transfer, and if that not low enough get some 3.9 NT centres or 4.1 WT maruti centres. Otherwise the 5.1 transfer and some 4.6 vit r&p's would work also. You MUST keep the 1L revvng. |
|
| Author: | Ben_Sierra [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
Fatzook wrote: Ben_Sierra wrote: Ah true... Still would be a little on the low side with those diff gears I'd have thought... Really? It has 4.1's now. And WT's are 3.7's so that makes it taller. Then you add the 5.1 transfer gears which are only 6% lower than the standard 1L case in Hi, and I'd say he need more gearing, not less. For 30-31's and a 1L motor You should aim for 6.5 transfer, and if that not low enough get some 3.9 NT centres or 4.1 WT maruti centres. Otherwise the 5.1 transfer and some 4.6 vit r&p's would work also. You MUST keep the 1L revvng. I guess... I haven't crunched the numbers for a 1L so I could be way off the mark with my guesswork... Of course, I didn't initially notice it was a 1.0L... |
|
| Author: | Fatzook [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
Yeah well if you think its bad to be undergeared in a 1.3, just image have 30% less power with those same gearing issues! 1L are a great thing offroad, but suffer from large tyres exponentially more than the 1.3 does. |
|
| Author: | TryHard [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
Ok so maby 6.5s ? then if its not low enuf run a different ring and pinion ? |
|
| Author: | Fatzook [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
TryHard wrote: Ok so maby 6.5s ? then if its not low enuf run a different ring and pinion ?
That will be the easiest/ cheapest way. 6.5's are great value for money. |
|
| Author: | TryHard [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
Fatzook wrote: TryHard wrote: Ok so maby 6.5s ? then if its not low enuf run a different ring and pinion ? That will be the easiest/ cheapest way. 6.5's are great value for money. ya i run them in my sierra and love them ..
i was just worryed about gearing to low but i guess its a 1.L engine haha so thats not posable to gear to low |
|
| Author: | Fatzook [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
TryHard wrote: Fatzook wrote: TryHard wrote: Ok so maby 6.5s ? then if its not low enuf run a different ring and pinion ? That will be the easiest/ cheapest way. 6.5's are great value for money. ya i run them in my sierra and love them .. i was just worryed about gearing to low but i guess its a 1.L engine haha so thats not posable to gear to low It is..... The 1L has 12% lower Hi-range gears than a 1.3 sierra already, so the reduction is far less than it would have been for your 1.3L. |
|
| Author: | TryHard [ Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NT LWB Zook |
Fatzook wrote: TryHard wrote: Fatzook wrote: TryHard wrote: Ok so maby 6.5s ? then if its not low enuf run a different ring and pinion ? That will be the easiest/ cheapest way. 6.5's are great value for money. ya i run them in my sierra and love them .. i was just worryed about gearing to low but i guess its a 1.L engine haha so thats not posable to gear to low It is..... The 1L has 12% lower Hi-range gears than a 1.3 sierra already, so the reduction is far less than it would have been for your 1.3L. ah ok well thanks Fatzook
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 9:30 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|