auszookers.com
http://auszookers.com/forum/

31's or 32's ?
http://auszookers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=25392
Page 1 of 1

Author:  buzbox [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 8:52 am ]
Post subject:  31's or 32's ?

I know it's been done to death but I just want to make sure I'm choosing the right size for my needs.

I've finally worn down my 30" BFG's and I need another set of muddies. I've made my mind up on brand, but still unsure on size. BTW. going on a 3"+2" vit.

31's will fit without cutting the guards. I have trial fitted a 31 and am a little unimpressed of the extra height gained.

32's well biggerer is gooderer right? they can still fit, but I'll have to do some hacking so it doesn't rub on flex, which means I will also need get new flares and make a few brackets so they can be fitted. I'm not too keen on doing this.

As for gearing, I'll have that sorted out eventually.

Author:  MrRocky [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 8:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

u can get away without gearin on 31's maybe but 32's 8O
no bingo

Author:  got_bar_work [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

if ur got a body lift 32 should fit pretty easy
as long as there narrow on a + offset rim u should be right
i have 31with 40mm bump stop extentions

Author:  nascpro44 [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

I just put 32" on my swb vit today 2 inch suspension lift 50mm coil spacers and 2" body lift i had to do a bit of bashing on the gaurds but i have got -13 offset wheels looks the goods but

Author:  stocker [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

31's are pretty horrible with no gearing.. not completely hopeless but... 32's + 1.6L... = Epic fail

Author:  got_bar_work [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

two of my mates run 33 km2 on there vit with std gearing

Author:  joel [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

MrRocky wrote:
u can get away without gearin on 31's maybe but 32's 8O
no bingo

i have no gearing, its o.k, as long as there a no hills.
i sit on a hundred o.k,
but the crawl speed is ridiculous, 32''s without gearing would truly be the suck.

Author:  stocker [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

got_bar_work wrote:
two of my mates run 33 km2 on there vit with std gearing



may as well call it a 4speed zook then?

Author:  SierraDan [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

joel wrote:
MrRocky wrote:
u can get away without gearin on 31's maybe but 32's 8O
no bingo

i have no gearing, its o.k, as long as there a no hills.
i sit on a hundred o.k,
but the crawl speed is ridiculous, 32''s without gearing would truly be the suck.

vitara?

Author:  joel [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

SierraDan wrote:
joel wrote:
MrRocky wrote:
u can get away without gearin on 31's maybe but 32's 8O
no bingo

i have no gearing, its o.k, as long as there a no hills.
i sit on a hundred o.k,
but the crawl speed is ridiculous, 32''s without gearing would truly be the suck.

vitara?

http://www.auszookers.com/index.php?nam ... ight=build
sierra

Author:  SierraDan [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

buzbox wrote:
I've finally worn down my 30" BFG's and I need another set of muddies. I've made my mind up on brand, but still unsure on size. BTW. going on a 3"+2" vit.

Author:  buzbox [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

hmm this is making me somewhat even more confused :lol:

I'm leaning towards 31's but again I'd like to use the vit setup to it's full potential.

Author:  SierraDan [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

buzbox wrote:
hmm this is making me somewhat even more confused :lol:

I'm leaning towards 31's but again I'd like to use the vit setup to it's full potential.


If you can work past this:
buzbox wrote:
I will also need get new flares and make a few brackets so they can be fitted. I'm not too keen on doing this.


Then 32's would be my choice if you have gearing sorted.

Author:  joel [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

SierraDan wrote:
buzbox wrote:
I've finally worn down my 30" BFG's and I need another set of muddies. I've made my mind up on brand, but still unsure on size. BTW. going on a 3"+2" vit.

same principles apply........ as in bigger tyres and stock gearing are ghey.

Author:  joel [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

buzbox wrote:
hmm this is making me somewhat even more confused :lol:

I'm leaning towards 31's but again I'd like to use the vit setup to it's full potential.

do u know "sikid"?
he ran 32'' in his vit and broke cv's all he time.
will an inch make that much difference? cost?
and availability?

Author:  atari4x4 [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

got_bar_work wrote:
two of my mates run 33 km2 on there vit with std gearing


once again, pics of said mates Vits. :helloo:

my mum's son runs a 235/75r15 that measures 31"

Author:  sogone [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

My 33's on stock gearing made me a 4 speed. Now with gears I'm a 5 speed again! In my old zook 30's were very bearable. And in joels car we even hit 110ks an hour! Which would really Be more cause his speedo was out due to 31's. Moral of the story. Get gears.

Author:  atari4x4 [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

FYI it's a vitara, high range gearing is almost impossible to correct unless you either get the undertaker or find some 5.3:1 or the mythical 5.8:1 diff gears.

Author:  buzbox [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

High range in vit's arn't changed like sierra's are.

31's = $210
32's = $260

In the first couple of months learning how to drive the vit I broke 2 CV's with 30's. Since learning a few things I havn't broke one for at least 8 months and I have pushed it harder than when it broke. So I put it down to driver error.

will an inch make a difference? I dunno, most girls tend to think it does.

Author:  Bucket [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

32" are fine. I ran a 32" wrangler and didn't have an dramas. Yes, lowering the ratio's wouldve been idea but it still wasn't bad. Could sit on 100kmph all day every day.

I ran 3" calmini and 2" BL. I had to chop into my front guards and a bit of rear bar modification to make them clear on compression...but I was running a -44 15x8 rim.

I say do it. If you decide you don't like it, sell them and go smaller.

Author:  atari4x4 [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

was that 100kph in 5th or 4th bucket?

Author:  Bucket [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

4th, but living in the city I really never had the need to even go that fast.

It was a bit fast in low but still drivable.

Author:  buzbox [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

Bucket wrote:

I say do it. If you decide you don't like it, sell them and go smaller.


and get around with chopped guards.


Well, It seems that 31's are the go for me.
I wouldn't want to sit in 4th gear along a freeway revving it's tits off.
Cost is another factor as well has having to modify the body for them and it would look like crap for when I have the AT's on.

Author:  Bucket [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

Huh?? Chopped guards are hardly crap looking. Just like any car, if u mark it and do it correctly it will look fine. Just like a Sierra virtual lift.

And it never "revved it tits off". I could've done 100 in fifth, but I never really got it cruising up there anyway.

Author:  christover1 [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

31's are a very common size, making them cheaper, easier to get,
especially in the out back.
Many new 4wd owners shed their 31's to go bigger,
meaning a 2nd hand supply of good rubber for us.
These are my reasons for sticking to 31's.
Even tho heart wants 33 x 10's :)

Author:  atari4x4 [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

if you went to a 32" tyre, i'd be aiming for a 9.5, after running 30x9.5's, then 31x10.5's in the same tread pattern & IMO it drove better on the 9.5's, but the extra height from the 31's won out.

the 235x75r15 Insa Turbo's simex copies that i've run for the last couple of weeks are essentially a 31x9.5 & as chunky as they are they don't tramline as much as the 10.5's.

tall skinny's are the future. 8)

Author:  Timbo_ [ Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

It is all dependent on driving style and plans for it. If all you do is play in the mud, no gearing is fine. But if you touch rocks. Lower gearing will take alot of stress of your gear under your car.

sikid was running thicker that 10.5" tyres. That makes the tyres a hell of alot heavier.

Id just go a decent set of 31" tyres. if you dont plan on gearing. for half an inch worth of diff clearence, an extra 200 dollars is a fair bit of fuel money.

Author:  ninjamoses [ Sun Sep 04, 2011 1:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 31's or 32's ?

atari4x4 wrote:
tall skinny's are the future. 8)


What he said :D

Depends on what you use it for and what you are hoping to achieve though. I wanted more diff clearance and for it to be less "look at me" to the general public. Nothing screams I'm modified more than fat rubber, especially on small cars like zooks, so going up to the 235/85/16s suited me perfectly.

With the calmini lift stretching the wheelbase ever so slightly you should be able to run the 32s with minimal chopping if you stuck to narrow ones on small/zero offset rims.

Gearing is going to be your main hurdle. I presume your Vit had 5.12s from the factory so you are shit out of luck already. If its a daily driver or used on the road often I'd keep with the 31s me thinks. If its just a weekend toy than pffft go the big uns :)

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 9:30 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/