| auszookers.com http://auszookers.com/forum/ |
|
| Snorkel diameter http://auszookers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=41996 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | jonfromhamilton [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Snorkel diameter |
What would you guys reccomend for a snorkel pipe diameter for a g16b in a. Sierra? |
|
| Author: | Fatzook [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
2.5" or 3.0" looks nice |
|
| Author: | Gwagensteve [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
3.0 for my money, but I don't like snorkels very much. Steve. |
|
| Author: | jonfromhamilton [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 3:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
I could put the air cleaner 2" out of the bonet |
|
| Author: | charged88 [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 3:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
Gwagensteve wrote: 3.0 for my money, but I don't like snorkels very much. Steve. Why's that? not a fan of water crossings or... (not having a dig just curious) |
|
| Author: | whincup [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 4:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
Gwagensteve wrote: 3.0 for my money, but I don't like snorkels very much. Steve. sorry, i havent taken the time to read through many build threads... what do you do with your intake? through the firewall? |
|
| Author: | sideways [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 4:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
FWIW the intake hose thing that goes to the exhaust on my 1l is 1.5". The summer intake on an LJ8x is 1 1/4". |
|
| Author: | SierraDan [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 4:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
charged88 wrote: Gwagensteve wrote: 3.0 for my money, but I don't like snorkels very much. Steve. Why's that? not a fan of water crossings or... (not having a dig just curious) I reckon same reason as myself. They would get destroyed with a particular type of wheeling. whincup wrote: sorry, i havent taken the time to read through many build threads... what do you do with your intake? through the firewall?
|
|
| Author: | Gwagensteve [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 4:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
The reason for 3" is it's the easiest diameter to get a Donaldson and a ram duct for. Yes, it's complete overkill for a Suzuki motor, but it's a balance of practicality, aesthetics and ease of fabrication. I hate the look of a small diameter pipe adapted up to 3" to take a ram duct. I'd rather do the adapting in the engine bay where I don't have to look at it all the time. I don't like snorkels very much because they are bulky and vulnerable right in an area that gets leant on, whacked by trees etc. I also think they are a bit of a tough guy sticker- they're pretty unnecessary- the stock Sierra intake is actually in a really good position and its very hard to hydro lock a Sierra. We also have few deep river crossings in Vic, and I try to stay out of mud that's anywhere deep enough to need a snorkel. I have had the intake though the firewall. The noise was terrible. Just my opinion. Steve. |
|
| Author: | charged88 [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 5:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
Ha yeah they do cop it, my patrol's one is crushed at the top of the windscreen from trees etc, though I must say I'm glad I have it as I can be one of those nuffties trying to drive the deepest bog/water crossing ha ha I have a 3" snorkle on my suzi and its way over the top but thats what I had in the shed.... |
|
| Author: | Scrawny [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
One of the few things I've bothered to throw together. 3" exhaust tube that cost $90 ![]() Got this from an online store, not sure if they're still around ![]() Thread in here viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2332 |
|
| Author: | bogga [ Thu Jul 18, 2013 6:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
Damage from my last layover landing on 2.5" stainless snorkle. Another lesson learned. ![]()
|
|
| Author: | jonfromhamilton [ Fri Jul 19, 2013 7:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
You all have valid points, I was in toolangi and the jeep behind me got hydro locked and it made me paranoid about that happening to me, plus I want to run little desert and Simpson desert next year and figured an intake up high would be better to avoid dust, Thoughts? |
|
| Author: | jonfromhamilton [ Fri Jul 19, 2013 7:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
Is there an alternative if I want to a kid ripping it off when I lay on my side? Maybe just get silicone bends and rubber mounts so it can fall off without damaging anything, like a lizards tail |
|
| Author: | Fatzook [ Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
Bogga....If you didnt have a snorkel, you would have done just as much, or possibly more damage anyway.... |
|
| Author: | tassie jeeper [ Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
hummer style snorkel?
|
|
| Author: | Gwagensteve [ Sun Jul 21, 2013 8:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
I like that sort of thing, but it needs careful design to ensure that water that washes up the bonnet doesn't just roll into the intake. The trolley tug has this sort of intake setup. viewtopic.php?f=4&t=14025 ![]() ![]() Steve. |
|
| Author: | tassie jeeper [ Mon Jul 22, 2013 10:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Snorkel diameter |
Gwagensteve wrote: I like that sort of thing, but it needs careful design to ensure that water that washes up the bonnet doesn't just roll into the intake. The trolley tug has this sort of intake setup. this looks like a great setup provided that rubber has a good seal |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 9:30 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|