| Author |
Message |
Xtreme
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:49 am Posts: 275
Vehicle: hkbjk
|
 Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 1:14 pm |
|
|
Does anyone happen to be familiar with the ADR rules about tyres protruding past the front or rear of a vehicle? I do not mean out to the side from the flares but rather:
1. Are they allowed to protrude past the front of the vehicle by any amount at all? (pretty sure I read they are not) and if not how does this rule not apply to wheels on other vehicles ie bikes and some machinary that has conditional road registration?
2. What exactly is classed as part of the vehicle? is the bar work regarded as the vehicle as in the tyres could protrude past the vehicle body as long as there is barwork that is at a point further then the leading edge of the tyre?
3. Is there any ADR regarding how much you can lengthen a wheel base by?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
 |
Zook_Fan

az supporter
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 4530 Location: Toowoomba
Vehicle: Maruti and LJ80's
|
 Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 1:24 pm |
|
|
You're not building something so the ADR's do not apply.
|
|
|
|
 |
Xtreme
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:49 am Posts: 275
Vehicle: hkbjk
|
 Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 3:14 pm |
|
Zook_Fan wrote: You're not building something so the ADR's do not apply. Rules for modifications
|
|
|
|
 |
tanshi

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 7717 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 3:20 pm |
|
|
well considering even the simplest rules say that the tyre tread needs to be covered by guards, no part of the tyre is going to legally be allowed to be forward of the panels and exposed.
|
|
|
|
 |
Xtreme
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:49 am Posts: 275
Vehicle: hkbjk
|
 Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 3:57 pm |
|
|
Ok so as long as it is covered by guards from the top it should be able to go all the way pretty much inline with the front of the vehicle or past as long as the guard covers it when looking down from above?
|
|
|
|
 |
Zook_Fan

az supporter
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 4530 Location: Toowoomba
Vehicle: Maruti and LJ80's
|
 Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 4:01 pm |
|
|
|
 |
greyghost
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:23 pm Posts: 189 Location: VIC
Vehicle: LJ50V 2 stroke
|
 Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 4:13 pm |
|
|
when i talked to an engineer, last.
he said the if you modify the wheelbase, it then becomes an ICV and a lot more hassle notably i didn't inform him that the RUF would alter the wheelbase.
|
|
|
|
 |
Jezza86

Platinum Supporter
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:30 am Posts: 2155 Location: Nhulunbuy 0880
Vehicle: 2010 jimny
|
 Posted: Thu May 22, 2014 4:43 pm |
|
|
You need rear mudguards. Therefore onroad you need removeable mudguards and a removeable frontclip for your buggy car.
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 9:02 pm |
|
when i engineered mine i added about 200mm to my wheelbase - tyre's dont stick out past the body anywhere though... but i asked the engineer about the whole front of the tyre being exposed at the front and he said its totally legal - body and barwork must deflect a pedestrian over the bonnet but there's nothing in the laws about protecting them from the tyres. So this (my sierra) is 100% legit: 
|
|
|
|
 |
BlueSuzy

az supporter
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 9716 Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB
|
 Posted: Sun May 25, 2014 5:35 pm |
|
greyghost wrote: when i talked to an engineer, last.
he said the if you modify the wheelbase, it then becomes an ICV and a lot more hassle notably i didn't inform him that the RUF would alter the wheelbase. Thats a joke. Mine was at least 1 original crossmember left, otherwise its icv. Wheels must be completely covered top view. Covered except for 300 to ground rear view. Not sure front view, mines passed though.
_________________ BlueSuzy wrote: I'm over the G16b's.
|
|
|
|
 |
|