| Author |
Message |
andrew
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 9:28 am Posts: 85
Vehicle: 92 suzuki sierra
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:04 am |
|
|
Ive just got my first zook on the road.. and im thinking of welding the front diff. Its pretty well stock 2in suspension lift 215 75 15 muddies. Its not really a daily driver and mostly i do off road. I figured front would be better to weld than rear ??
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13001 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:53 am |
|
|
No. Front welded brings the suck.
|
|
|
|
 |
ninjamoses

az supporter
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 1787 Location: Butler, WA
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 11:23 am |
|
|
I concur. My autolocker in the front is playing up and has locked on at the moment. Makes the car a heap of shit to drive, steering locks solid as soon as you hit a grippy surface.
Getting out to unlock a hub just to make it around a corner isn't my idea of fun.
|
|
|
|
 |
AckerDackerly

az supporter
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:53 pm Posts: 361 Location: Independence, MO USA
Vehicle: 1993 RHD Suzuki Escudo Tintop
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 11:29 am |
|
|
Let's look at welded diffs...
(Pardon the detailed explanation as other readers not familiar with the technology might need help understanding the discussion...)
A welded differential eliminates the differential effect that allows the wheels on the axle to turn at an independent rate. This is important as all four wheels actually rotate at different speeds during a turn to the left or the right through the magic of "open" differentials. A welded differential will make it necessary to use extra force to turn and hold the steering wheel when turning. On the other hand, if you are driving on slippery surfaces or you have one wheel off the ground, a welded differential will always transmit power to the other wheel on the axle that is in contact with the ground!
A welded differential makes the vehicle hard to steer/control but easy (in a perverted way of thinking) to drive in 4wd mode through situations where a wheel loses traction.
Welding the front axle sort of works when you have the ability to lock and unlock the wheel hubs. When the hubs are unlocked, you can drive the truck on the road normally in two-wheel drive. Locked hubs let you wrestle (!!!) the truck down the trail in four wheel drive. Driving on the road with locked hubs in 4wd is a dangerous idea on many levels!
[EDITED FOR ACCURACY 01-16-16] A slightly better alternative is to buy and install a device that selectively locks/unlocks the differential under varying operational conditions. Known by their brand names like Lock-Rites, etc., these are cheap and popular devices that work better than a welded differential or it's manufactured cousin the "spool". Even better would be a Limited Slip Differential (LSD - hehe) which does a much smoother job of locking up the differential under varying operational conditions. Unfortunately, LSDs are hard to find for the Suzuki 4wd product line. [END EDIT]
I have a Lock-Rite in the front axle of my Samurai (ie. "WT Sierra"). It is handy to have on the trail but makes steering in tight places with power applied a pain in the arse.
In summation:
To quote Gwagensteve-
No. Front welded brings the suck.
I hope that this helps!
_________________ -Ack http://www.acksfaq.com88, 88.5 SJ413
Last edited by AckerDackerly on Thu Jan 07, 2016 1:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13001 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 12:02 pm |
|
|
Lock rights/Spartan lockers/Detroit lockers do not selectively lock. They selectively unlock.
They are also poor offroad in the front when descending or on slick surfaces, where there is insufficient torque from the over speeding wheel to unlock the mechanism. At which point they drive just as badly as a welded diff.
My own car is spooled (same as welded) rear and air locked front. With my front locker in my car is almost undrivable even with power steering.
|
|
|
|
 |
DC3PTIKON
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2014 3:16 pm Posts: 149
Vehicle: Vitara SV420
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 2:24 pm |
|
|
Auto lockers are unlocked at rest or coast conditions. They only lock when the cross pin is under load, whether it be acceleration or deceleration using engine braking.
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 3:44 pm |
|
|
I agree on front locker... when mine's locked, steering and low speed is hard work, turning circle is greatly reduced and you get understeer and skid steer when the wheels spin, which can put you on some really spooky side angles when the whole front end slides sideways on a climb!
|
|
|
|
 |
henno

I live here!
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:56 pm Posts: 2439 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: Which one?
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 3:46 pm |
|
|
I'd take a welded rear and air locked front every day of the week over the reverse.
|
|
|
|
 |
fordem
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 2656 Location: Georgetown, Guyana
Vehicle: JB420, APK416, A6G415, A6N415
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:02 am |
|
DC3PTIKON wrote: Auto lockers are unlocked at rest or coast conditions. They only lock when the cross pin is under load, whether it be acceleration or deceleration using engine braking. I have in front of me, the Lockright owner's & installation manuals - I can post the exploded diagram if you're not familiar with it - in the rest position the bias springs push the couplers outward forcing them to engage with the drivers/side gears. The test procedure from the installation manual reads as follows. 2. Put the transmission and transfer case in gear to lock the drive shaft. 3. Rotate one of the tires in the forward direction with your hand until it stops, then hold it. That side of the LOCK-RIGHT is now locked. The vehicle is at rest with the engine off, the cross pin is not loaded - if the locker was "unlocked" the wheel would not stop, it would continue to turn freely - it turns just far enough for the dogs on the face of the coupler and the driver to engage and then stops - the bias spring is pushing the coupler outward forcing it to engage with the driver/side gear. Yes - when you apply torque the cross pin forces the coupler to engage the driver/side gear and the vehicle moves, but even when there is no torque applied, the coupler is still forced to engage the driver/side gear, just with a lot less pressure so that if sufficient force is applied by the wheel it can overcome the force of the bias spring, disengage the coupler and ratchet past it.
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13001 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:20 am |
|
|
That was my understanding Fordem.
One of my problems with ratcheting (un)lockers is that on very slick surfaces and with a light car, the overspeeding tyre can't provide enough torque to unlock the locker. This might be partially due to setup, but it's been my experience nonetheless.
|
|
|
|
 |
DC3PTIKON
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2014 3:16 pm Posts: 149
Vehicle: Vitara SV420
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 8:56 am |
|
fordem wrote: DC3PTIKON wrote: Auto lockers are unlocked at rest or coast conditions. They only lock when the cross pin is under load, whether it be acceleration or deceleration using engine braking. I have in front of me, the Lockright owner's & installation manuals - I can post the exploded diagram if you're not familiar with it - in the rest position the bias springs push the couplers outward forcing them to engage with the drivers/side gears. The test procedure from the installation manual reads as follows. 2. Put the transmission and transfer case in gear to lock the drive shaft. 3. Rotate one of the tires in the forward direction with your hand until it stops, then hold it. That side of the LOCK-RIGHT is now locked. The vehicle is at rest with the engine off, the cross pin is not loaded - if the locker was "unlocked" the wheel would not stop, it would continue to turn freely - it turns just far enough for the dogs on the face of the coupler and the driver to engage and then stops - the bias spring is pushing the coupler outward forcing it to engage with the driver/side gear. Yes - when you apply torque the cross pin forces the coupler to engage the driver/side gear and the vehicle moves, but even when there is no torque applied, the coupler is still forced to engage the driver/side gear, just with a lot less pressure so that if sufficient force is applied by the wheel it can overcome the force of the bias spring, disengage the coupler and ratchet past it. Look at the instructions and what you just wrote in contradicting itself, the crosspin IS loaded even with the engine off. '2. Put the transmission and transfer case in gear to lock the drive shaft.' What you are doing here is causing the pinion to 'Yes' load the crosspin as the transmission locking the pinion so is wont turn, therefore simulating acceleration or engine braking deceleration which will lock the LOCK-RIGHT. So as I said, unless the crosspin is loaded auto lockers are 'unlocked' until drive or resistance (locked transmission, deceleration) is applied. If you jack both rear wheels, put the car in neutral and have two people turn the rear wheels in opposite directions, yes the LOCK-RIGHT will ratchet and operate as an open diff, and without load in a rest position, be unlocked.
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13001 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:36 am |
|
|
Sorry mate you're off track with this. The lockers default position is locked. Only the application of torque from an overspeeding wheel unlocks it.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
DC3PTIKON
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2014 3:16 pm Posts: 149
Vehicle: Vitara SV420
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:57 am |
|
Gwagensteve wrote: Sorry mate you're off track with this. The lockers default position is locked. Only the application of torque from an overspeeding wheel unlocks it.
Steve. Not at all Mate. Do some research. Cheers
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13001 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 10:03 am |
|
|
If you're correct then the negative behaviour of the locker on slick surfaces wouldn't exist.
|
|
|
|
 |
DC3PTIKON
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2014 3:16 pm Posts: 149
Vehicle: Vitara SV420
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 10:14 am |
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13001 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 10:27 am |
|
|
Yes, that's exactly how it works. The springs keep the locker engaged until the overspeeding wheel drives the coupler.
|
|
|
|
 |
DC3PTIKON
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2014 3:16 pm Posts: 149
Vehicle: Vitara SV420
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 10:49 am |
|
Gwagensteve wrote: Yes, that's exactly how it works. The springs keep the locker engaged until the overspeeding wheel drives the coupler. The springs are to stop the teeth from just floating around during normal/open differential action etc, not to provide locking. Did you watch and listen to the video? You can overcome those little springs and chamfered teeth easily by hand as I described earlier. Actual locking is only provided once the crosspin is loaded.
|
|
|
|
 |
fordem
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 2656 Location: Georgetown, Guyana
Vehicle: JB420, APK416, A6G415, A6N415
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 10:56 am |
|
DC3PTIKON wrote: the crosspin IS loaded even with the engine off. ' Where does the torque to load the crosspin come from with the engine off? Quote: 2. Put the transmission and transfer case in gear to lock the drive shaft.' What you are doing here is causing the pinion to 'Yes' load the crosspin as the transmission locking the pinion so is wont turn, No - what I'm doing is preventing the crosspin from turning - what this does is allow the driver to turn the coupler and that loads the cross pin - the torque for this comes from the wheel which is being manually rotated - the point you're not grasping is that for the driver to turn the coupler, it has to be engaged - or in other words - locked. Because of the bias springs the default state is for the couplers to engage the drivers.
|
|
|
|
 |
DC3PTIKON
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2014 3:16 pm Posts: 149
Vehicle: Vitara SV420
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 12:01 pm |
|
|
Hey Fordem,
The torque is provided by you manually turning the wheel, this inturn energises the crosspin. Like I said, putting it in gear and turning the wheel by hand simulates over run or engine braking which will also load the crosspin. The crosspin resists turning as the vehicle is in gear, therefore causing the coupler to ramp up the crosspin and apply the force needed to hold the teeth engaged and not allow them to come apart/slip. If these auto lockers were always locked as you say, you wouldn't be able to turn the wheel easily by hand when out of gear which is the case, even with one wheel on the ground. It will happily ratchet.
The coupler is not engaged when no load is applied, it is at rest. Those little springs are merely holding the coupler in place the stop any chatter and couplers floating. But as soon as you apply the manual rotation and the vehicle is in gear, it only take a couple of mm of rotation for the coupler to ramp up the crosspin and engage, hence why it may feel like it's always locked.
Last edited by DC3PTIKON on Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
 |
andrew
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 9:28 am Posts: 85
Vehicle: 92 suzuki sierra
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 12:06 pm |
|
|
So mini spool rear air lock front seems to be the go.. ill start with rear as its probably cheaper... Thanks heaps guys this forum has been worth its weight in gold.. now by cars going ill post a pic thanks heaps for every step along the way in helping me get my first 4by done.
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:46 pm |
|
|
If you can afford to airlock the rear that's the best option, as you can run a totally open diff on the road without worrying about every single roundabout in winter... oh and when you're in a concrete carpark with the rear locked it sounds like you're ripping the biggest burnout just turning into a bay =) hahaha
|
|
|
|
 |
SierraDan

az supporter
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:55 pm Posts: 9347 Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: G13BB Jimny
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 11:56 am |
|
Lockright front. Selectable rear. 
_________________ mlm
|
|
|
|
 |
missmyljdaze
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 7:16 am Posts: 2323 Location: perth
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:02 pm |
|
Sorry for interupting [well - I'm not really sorry, just pretending to be polite] What has happened regarding the new type of locking differential that one of our crew invented? Last I heard it was being tested by someone - any further info? stephen
|
|
|
|
 |
Scrawny

I live here!
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 10528 Location: Brissie
Vehicle: Popemobile
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:14 pm |
|
|
Let's just say it's life was a VERY short one!
|
|
|
|
 |
Kor3y101
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2015 6:50 pm Posts: 613 Location: Ipswich
Vehicle: 98 Jimny
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:59 pm |
|
|
Greenzook was testing it, it failed miserably with less then hours use on it.
|
|
|
|
 |
Reubs
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1522 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: SJ80, SE416
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 9:29 pm |
|
missmyljdaze wrote: Sorry for interupting [well - I'm not really sorry, just pretending to be polite] What has happened regarding the new type of locking differential that one of our crew invented? Can I hijack this thread some more? Kor3y101 wrote: Greenzook was testing it, it failed miserably with less then hours use on it. Scrawn wrote: Let's just say it's life was a VERY short one! Does anyone know what became of the other dozen or so prototypes? Were the fitted? Used? Are they broken too? Pics of said locker? Threads love pics! 
|
|
|
|
 |
Red89
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 2801 Location: Perth
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:00 pm |
|
|
Didn't Kenn field test it for 12 months prior to release ?
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:31 pm |
|
|
The fact we've heard nothing of it would tend to point to failure as an option though =)
|
|
|
|
 |
greenzook89

az supporter
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2591 Location: Ipswich
Vehicle: LJ80V-II, SJ40, SJ40T, RS415
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 11:13 pm |
|
|
Yeah I was testing one. Can't really say too much as it needs to go back to Joe and get an autopsy done. But i beleive mine has an issue with the locking mechanism. Kenn was running one and so was another fellow down Victoria. I know 2 have been sold before even being fitted and there are about 3 more i know that arent fitted.
_________________ 31zook wrote: Makes me want something similar
|
|
|
|
 |
jdk81
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2372 Location: Ballarat, VIC
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2016 6:00 am |
|
|
|
 |
|