| Author |
Message |
bazook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 1082 Location: brisbane logan
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:54 pm |
|
oh god flame suit on  has anyone thought of turboing a j20, I know suzuki were looking a making a sx4 turbo(sxforce)but has anyone done it before, apparently these motors can take 7psi without after market computers but would the internals be strong enough to cope with that day in day out or would you need to source j23 (forged if possible) pistons, forged crank and so on
And no this idea is just an idea its not an offroad car just a daily car idea i thought about
suzuki kizashi turbo concept  comes to mind would be the go
_________________ josh AKA Bazook
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:01 pm |
|
|
I think its a great idea. But what vehicle are we talking about here?
On the ECU comment, Perhaps the J20 can be set up to run 7psi on factoy ECU. But its fa from best practice, and only invites failure.
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34842 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:28 pm |
|
i toy with this idea day in day out... found this the other day, basic turbo mods, bodgy manifold but still pretty impressive for the pos that it is.
http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/inde ... pic=495024
Quote: Hey guys. Just thought I'd post some pics of my car. Yes I know it's not everyone's cup of tea, but it's an exercise in being different, I think it works  My pb is a 13.2 @ 167km/h down the 1/4 mile, that was without any suspension mods, and bout 30hp less than current, looking to have another crack at 12s. mods: I've done everything myself except the exhaust and the first tune... All up it makes about 270-280hp. last dyno was without external gate, smaller dump and .64 housing and only 8psi, made 255.3hp. GT2860rs .86 ar Godspeed manifold and custom adapter 3" exhaust, 3.5" cat FMIC GFB plumb back BOV NA SR20 cable throttle conversion (was fly-by-wire before) custom idle motor EMS Stinger ECU tuned by me (with 1st tune from Hyperdrive motorsport) 440cc WRX injectors x-treme HD clutch and lightweight fly few gauges turbo timer coming soon: slotted rotors S15 coilovers (they fit believe it or not!) pics:    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuyAV5Nz ... r_embedded
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
Mistaria81
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 175 Location: mango hill, Queensland
Vehicle: 2004 KJ jeep cherokee
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 7:37 pm |
|
|
really depends on the engine. with turbos ur better of running an ecu for saftey, that said it's been done without a ecu so yea. talk to your local turbo enginerring person and they can steer you in the right direction...
_________________ If at first you don't suceed... lower your standar
|
|
|
|
 |
bazook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 1082 Location: brisbane logan
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:43 pm |
|
|
maybe a grand vitara j20 model
_________________ josh AKA Bazook
|
|
|
|
 |
neofitou
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 1088 Location: Melbourne
Vehicle: 00 Jimny, 63 Haffy
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:51 am |
|
The Road Race Motorsport turbo kit makes 205kw on a j20, but it's $5k
I'm thinking of doing it to an sx4 when we get back to au.
My wife is under the impression (somehow) that turbo charged cars are more fuel efficient ... 
|
|
|
|
 |
bazook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 1082 Location: brisbane logan
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 11:00 am |
|
|
_________________ josh AKA Bazook
|
|
|
|
 |
Vits93

az supporter
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:42 am Posts: 233 Location: Nowra NSW
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:03 pm |
|
neofitou wrote: The Road Race Motorsport turbo kit makes 205kw on a j20, but it's $5k I'm thinking of doing it to an sx4 when we get back to au. My wife is under the impression (somehow) that turbo charged cars are more fuel efficient ... 
Well your wife i right just not in the way you were thinking, a turbo car is more efficient because its uses the wasted energy from the exhaust gas to produce more power and it also increases volumetric efficiency of the engine as well.
|
|
|
|
 |
neofitou
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 1088 Location: Melbourne
Vehicle: 00 Jimny, 63 Haffy
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:22 pm |
|
Vits93 wrote: Well your wife i right just not in the way you were thinking, a turbo car is more efficient because its uses the wasted energy from the exhaust gas to produce more power and it also increases volumetric efficiency of the engine as well.
Actually this is almost the exact description I gave her..
But then went on to show her all the super efficient cars on the market are all turbo.
Problem is she is a lead foot.
|
|
|
|
 |
harvs

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:31 am Posts: 192 Location: Newcastle
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:01 am |
|
I'm currently playing with this idea, well, kind of working towards it as apposed to playing with it.
I've datalogged the ECU to get the standard injector pulse widths to make it an easy task of converting to a Megasquit. I've attached the results if anyone is interested.
Next is an engine rebuild when I get back from NZ in about a month.
Then I'll start fabing up the manifold, changing ecu etc.
This isn't the first time I've done a totally DIY turbo conversion though, so I pretty well know what I'm in for.
Personally I think with the release of the megasquirt years ago, I believe the only reason people tend to try and stick with standard ECUs is due to lack of knowledge. Cost is now well within the budget of anyone serious about doing a proper conversion.
I'm yet to do a pressure vs flow test on the stock fuel pump, but the injectors at least should be good for a 30-40% increase in power without increasing fuel pressure.
I'm not going radical though. Totally to increase mid range torque for off-road (particuarly sand) driving.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
|
|
|
|
 |
JrZook
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 5517 Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:53 am |
|
|
So I assume you are going to use these observed pulse widths and IAT temperatures to try back calculate a VE table for use in the MS?
_________________ Lil Foot!
http://tiny.cc/gtsw1
|
|
|
|
 |
harvs

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:31 am Posts: 192 Location: Newcastle
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:03 am |
|
|
Yeah pretty much. I already know the injector flow rates (since they're standard and that's in the manual), so I'll just punch figures into the VE table until it gives me the same pulse widths...
I can see why the MS guys set up the calculations the way they did, but at times I'd prefer the good old approach of just putting the pulse width's into a table.
BTW, it's all pulse width vs manifold pressure. IAT was the same throughout all the measurements (well close enough anyway.) I guess that's probably what you meant anyway...
|
|
|
|
 |
|