It is currently Thu Aug 06, 2026 5:05 pm
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 
Author Message

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:18 am
Posts: 273
Location: traralgon
Vehicle: Jimny

Post Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:22 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
hey guys i have been pondering on the decision for quite some time now. the time has come for me to finally up grade my jimny and started modding the little green lady. for a start i know im going at least three inch lift (jimny bits) custom front and rear bar. sliders. possibly roof sliders. laminated diffs. sierra transfer and hubs. i basically wanna build a super capable camping/hunting daily driving toy. im leaning towards 31s because there a bit bigger and tougher looking.

anyway i will appreciate anyones toughts on the subject. are 31s over kill?

_________________
DONT BUY A GQ! zooks are better. i have both :)

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13008
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:28 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Niether.

If you want "super capable" in vic shoot for 7.50 16's or 34X9's. Either will be easier to fit than 31's because the narrower profile means they can tuck into the guards better, and they will bother offer better bite and drivability in victorian terrain.

31's are far from overkill if you are looking for capability.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:58 am
Posts: 11092
Location: Mandurah.W.A.
Vehicle: 84 LWB NT

Post Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:37 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
X2 I found my jim just as capable on 235's compared to 31's cus of the narrower width of the 235's. The 235's offered better bite of loose surfaces because there was more ground pressure, where as the 31x10.5's have less ground pressure. I do like the extra diff clearance from the 31's though, and that's why i sticking with them until there stuffed. But then again i do find the 31's better on high traction surfaces, but i think that has more to do with tyre compound etc... My next tyres with either be 31x9.5 or 32x9.5 (This is based on WA conditions :wink: )

_________________
Tell my arse, he actually gives a crap!

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:18 am
Posts: 273
Location: traralgon
Vehicle: Jimny

Post Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:53 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
are super swampers the only tires you can get in 34/9.5 ? i would like a set of radials. i wanna keep my fuel ecconomy as good as possible as the car is my daily. i also dont wanna attract to much attention from the .50 maybe 31/10 on 8s.

_________________
DONT BUY A GQ! zooks are better. i have both :)

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2372
Location: Ballarat, VIC

Post Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:06 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I like skinny tyres too, 31x10.5 imo are too wide for a sierra or jimny. I have 31x10.5s because I was planning a touring trip and wanted an alround tyre.

Even 6.5r16
205r16 are about 30.5"
235/85R16 near 32"
205R16 about 30.5"
650R16
Max width would be 9.5"

If you dont want too crazy, 205r16 would be alright.

The issue is finding the tread pattern you want, in the size you want. This is difficult as most offroad tyres are larger.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:18 am
Posts: 273
Location: traralgon
Vehicle: Jimny

Post Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:20 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
i already have a set of procomp 15/8 rims so i sorta wanna keep them.

_________________
DONT BUY A GQ! zooks are better. i have both :)

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13008
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:28 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
8's are too wide for any tyre under 12.5 wide IMHO.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:55 pm
Posts: 9348
Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: G13BB Jimny

Post Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:36 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Gwagensteve wrote:
8's are too wide for any tyre under 12.5 wide IMHO.

Steve.

I agree with that. It's ducking horrible without beadlocks.

_________________
mlm

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:58 am
Posts: 11092
Location: Mandurah.W.A.
Vehicle: 84 LWB NT

Post Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:42 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Gwagensteve wrote:
8's are too wide for any tyre under 12.5 wide IMHO.

Steve.



Gwagensteve wrote:

An 11.5 should be on an 8" rim.



:?

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=30021

I ran 2 psi in my 31x10.5s the other day on 8" rims, yes it did look like the tyre was about to fall off the rim, but it was ok. :lol:

_________________
Tell my arse, he actually gives a crap!

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 731
Location: Townsville
Vehicle: 88 SWB WT Sierra soft top ute

Post Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:52 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Depends on the terrain, my 34x10.5 swampers are fine in the dry on 8" rims under 10psi but mud has a lovely way of working into the bead and causing leaks at those pressures. I would get 15x7's with custom offset if I was to buy new rims.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 9242
Location: maito
Vehicle: <3 Edna <3

Post Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 8:59 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I have 15x8s on 235s, there far too wide, I have wheel spacers and 15x7s waiting to be cut and offset a touch more.

I can tell you that 235s and 37s are only a little different in performance, just the rolling diameter makes a bit of difference, but it wasn't anything amazing.....

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 573
Location: Perth WA

Post Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:20 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Quote:
Niether.

If you want "super capable" in vic shoot for 7.50 16's or 34X9's. Either will be easier to fit than 31's because the narrower profile means they can tuck into the guards better, and they will bother offer better bite and drivability in victorian terrain.

31's are far from overkill if you are looking for capability.


What rims can u get to suit a 7.50 16? Other then custom? I would love to run these or 235/85 16.
Is the lt construction still ok for a zook. I would of thought they where a bit stiff?

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:58 am
Posts: 11092
Location: Mandurah.W.A.
Vehicle: 84 LWB NT

Post Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 10:35 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
birko wrote:
Quote:
Niether.

If you want "super capable" in vic shoot for 7.50 16's or 34X9's. Either will be easier to fit than 31's because the narrower profile means they can tuck into the guards better, and they will bother offer better bite and drivability in victorian terrain.

31's are far from overkill if you are looking for capability.


What rims can u get to suit a 7.50 16? Other then custom? I would love to run these or 235/85 16.
Is the lt construction still ok for a zook. I would of thought they where a bit stiff?



Then you sell me your old tyres? :P

_________________
Tell my arse, he actually gives a crap!

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:55 pm
Posts: 3266
Location: perth wa

Post Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 8:50 am 
Reply with quote Top  
31x10.5 work mint on 8 inch rims
never rolled 1 off yet running them on 7 psi almost evey trip
my sand tires are run on a 7 inch wide as i like to slide across dunes and go fast

_________________
dodgy brothers mechanical

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:55 pm
Posts: 9348
Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: G13BB Jimny

Post Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:51 am 
Reply with quote Top  
If you get any real side loading, as in no weight on the wheels in one side of the car, on a 10.5 tyre with 8" rim it will fill the beads with shit and/or roll the tyre.

_________________
mlm

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:18 am
Posts: 273
Location: traralgon
Vehicle: Jimny

Post Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 11:53 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Where I am there's no real sand driving. More mud and rocks. If 8s are fine with bead locks I will bead lock em. I already have A set ready to weld on from my patrOl that I got laser cut

_________________
DONT BUY A GQ! zooks are better. i have both :)

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:55 pm
Posts: 9348
Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: G13BB Jimny

Post Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 1:55 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
zammit wrote:
Where I am there's no real sand driving. More mud and rocks. If 8s are fine with bead locks I will bead lock em. I already have A set ready to weld on from my patrOl that I got laser cut


im beadlockin my 31's on 8's, cannot wait!

_________________
mlm

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:18 am
Posts: 273
Location: traralgon
Vehicle: Jimny

Post Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 4:24 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
im beadlockin my 31's on 8's, cannot wait![/quote]


:D

_________________
DONT BUY A GQ! zooks are better. i have both :)

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13008
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:51 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Welding a mechanical beadlock to a steel rim adds approximately 0.5" to the rim width. Honestly, for Victorian conditions, a 6" rim with a welded beadlock would be a better choice for a 10.5" tyre than an 8" rim with a welded beadlock.

You'll be bashing the rims into the ground constantly if you run low enough pressure to justify the beadlock.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:18 am
Posts: 273
Location: traralgon
Vehicle: Jimny

Post Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:29 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
hey steve. can you get 7 inch rims with -23 off set? yur aking me lean towards seven because you know my area.

_________________
DONT BUY A GQ! zooks are better. i have both :)

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13008
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:09 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I don't know - a quick search will tell you.

Still committed to 31's though? You're leaving a LOT of capability on the table compared to a narrower tyre in Vic conditions.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:18 am
Posts: 273
Location: traralgon
Vehicle: Jimny

Post Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:52 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
i dont really wanna go any bigger yet.

_________________
DONT BUY A GQ! zooks are better. i have both :)

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13008
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:09 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
It's not the height, it's the ratio of height to width.

Most 7.50's are barely taller than a 31, but have much squarer shoulders and a narrower tread and that improves drivability and traction.

Steve.

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 661 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours