It is currently Sun Apr 19, 2026 5:11 pm
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 989
Location: Blue Mountains
Vehicle: SJ51T

Post Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 4:55 am 
Reply with quote Top  
seeing as excel boxes have been mated to gti engines i would have thought it wouldnt be much more difficult to do the reverse. or am i way off?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 12997
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 5:06 am 
Reply with quote Top  
maybe but a GTI box is still transverse and flywheel/clutch etc is all unknown.

But there's other issues here - engine mounts, accessory mounts, sump, manifold and coolant hose position all may or may not be issues.

There's generally little point in using a FWD motor (of only moderate output) just because it's cheap. Much better to use an engine that was/is available in a RWD format so you know there's at least some chance it's going to work. There is some case to go through the pain if it's an exceptional FWD motor ( Mivec mitsubishi, 4AGE20V/4AGZE etc) but then gearbox choice becomes even more critical.

I also see no point in attaching a more powerful motor to a sierra gearbox. Vitara is much better option (even a manual vitara box if you are bit queer) because they are newer, stronger (particularly clutch and flywheel the manual), and easier to get hold of.

Adapting a cheap motor to a sierra gearbox is putting good money after bad in my book.
Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 21335
Location: Smart Ass Island

Post Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:21 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Gwagensteve wrote:
maybe but a GTI box is still transverse and flywheel/clutch etc is all unknown.

But there's other issues here - engine mounts, accessory mounts, sump, manifold and coolant hose position all may or may not be issues.

There's generally little point in using a FWD motor (of only moderate output) just because it's cheap. Much better to use an engine that was/is available in a RWD format so you know there's at least some chance it's going to work. There is some case to go through the pain if it's an exceptional FWD motor ( Mivec mitsubishi, 4AGE20V/4AGZE etc) but then gearbox choice becomes even more critical.

I also see no point in attaching a more powerful motor to a sierra gearbox. Vitara is much better option (even a manual vitara box if you are bit queer) because they are newer, stronger (particularly clutch and flywheel the manual), and easier to get hold of.

Adapting a cheap motor to a sierra gearbox is putting good money after bad in my book.
Steve.


G16b is plenty.... :helloo:

_________________
I used to be indecisive,
now I'm not so sure.....

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 12997
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:23 am 
Reply with quote Top  
steak_knife wrote:

G16b is more than enough.... :helloo:
:evil:

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 21335
Location: Smart Ass Island

Post Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:41 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Gwagensteve wrote:
steak_knife wrote:

G16b is more than enough.... :helloo:
:evil:


Sorry Mr gspot.... 8O

_________________
I used to be indecisive,
now I'm not so sure.....

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 12997
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:59 am 
Reply with quote Top  
The clutch and flywheel on a vitara box is way superior, and an adapter is eliminated. Granted the gearbox mount and jackshaft need work, but that's no more money than an adapter.

There's nothing inherently wrong with a sierra box, but considering the G16 is probably being split from a vitara manual in order to be bolted to a smaller flywheel, clutch and manual and it doesn't seem to make sense to me.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 21335
Location: Smart Ass Island

Post Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 8:02 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Gwagensteve wrote:
The clutch and flywheel on a vitara box is way superior, and an adapter is eliminated. Granted the gearbox mount and jackshaft need work, but that's no more money than an adapter.

There's nothing inherently wrong with a sierra box, but considering the G16 is probably being split from a vitara manual in order to be bolted to a smaller flywheel, clutch and manual and it doesn't seem to make sense to me.

Steve.


spin's up quicker, & a clutch will last long time if geared & treated right...

_________________
I used to be indecisive,
now I'm not so sure.....

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 12997
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 8:54 am 
Reply with quote Top  
True, but a heavier flywheel is an advantage offroad.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 867
Location: nsw, newcastle

Post Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:22 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Being different is all well and good and I'm the first to say go for it. However the expenses with being different skyrocket. Its alot easier and cheaper to go with the trialled and tested. Like many ppl have said how much power do u really need in a 4wd. When ur putting crawler gears to go slow u don't need a huge engine. If u want power build a race car

_________________
1996 sierra + 2" body lift + SPOA conversion + ome

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:05 am
Posts: 241
Location: Eltham, Victoria

Post Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:33 am 
Reply with quote Top  
mcwilly wrote:
Being different is all well and good and I'm the first to say go for it. However the expenses with being different skyrocket. Its alot easier and cheaper to go with the trialled and tested. Like many ppl have said how much power do u really need in a 4wd. When ur putting crawler gears to go slow u don't need a huge engine. If u want power build a race car


Yeah but it's nice to actually be able overtake a slow car occasionally or not have to work the car just to keep up with traffic on hills, or have to drop back gears everytime you come up to a hill.

If I ever do an engine conversion, I'm not aiming for traction breaking power, but enough so I can do all of the things mentioned above easily.

All our cars are very underpowered.

Matty

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 21335
Location: Smart Ass Island

Post Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 5:01 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Gwagensteve wrote:
True, but a heavier flywheel is an advantage offroad.

Steve.


I like the quick spin, can't see the gain of a slower rev.... for what I drive....

_________________
I used to be indecisive,
now I'm not so sure.....

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours