| Author |
Message |
matty_wall
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 989 Location: Blue Mountains
Vehicle: SJ51T
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 4:55 am |
|
|
seeing as excel boxes have been mated to gti engines i would have thought it wouldnt be much more difficult to do the reverse. or am i way off?
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 12997 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 5:06 am |
|
|
maybe but a GTI box is still transverse and flywheel/clutch etc is all unknown.
But there's other issues here - engine mounts, accessory mounts, sump, manifold and coolant hose position all may or may not be issues.
There's generally little point in using a FWD motor (of only moderate output) just because it's cheap. Much better to use an engine that was/is available in a RWD format so you know there's at least some chance it's going to work. There is some case to go through the pain if it's an exceptional FWD motor ( Mivec mitsubishi, 4AGE20V/4AGZE etc) but then gearbox choice becomes even more critical.
I also see no point in attaching a more powerful motor to a sierra gearbox. Vitara is much better option (even a manual vitara box if you are bit queer) because they are newer, stronger (particularly clutch and flywheel the manual), and easier to get hold of.
Adapting a cheap motor to a sierra gearbox is putting good money after bad in my book.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
steak_knife

az supporter
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 21335 Location: Smart Ass Island
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:21 am |
|
Gwagensteve wrote: maybe but a GTI box is still transverse and flywheel/clutch etc is all unknown.
But there's other issues here - engine mounts, accessory mounts, sump, manifold and coolant hose position all may or may not be issues.
There's generally little point in using a FWD motor (of only moderate output) just because it's cheap. Much better to use an engine that was/is available in a RWD format so you know there's at least some chance it's going to work. There is some case to go through the pain if it's an exceptional FWD motor ( Mivec mitsubishi, 4AGE20V/4AGZE etc) but then gearbox choice becomes even more critical.
I also see no point in attaching a more powerful motor to a sierra gearbox. Vitara is much better option (even a manual vitara box if you are bit queer) because they are newer, stronger (particularly clutch and flywheel the manual), and easier to get hold of.
Adapting a cheap motor to a sierra gearbox is putting good money after bad in my book. Steve.
G16b is plenty.... 
_________________ I used to be indecisive,
now I'm not so sure.....
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 12997 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:23 am |
|
steak_knife wrote: G16b is more than enough....  
|
|
|
|
 |
steak_knife

az supporter
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 21335 Location: Smart Ass Island
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:41 am |
|
Gwagensteve wrote: steak_knife wrote: G16b is more than enough....  
Sorry Mr gspot.... 
_________________ I used to be indecisive,
now I'm not so sure.....
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 12997 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 7:59 am |
|
|
The clutch and flywheel on a vitara box is way superior, and an adapter is eliminated. Granted the gearbox mount and jackshaft need work, but that's no more money than an adapter.
There's nothing inherently wrong with a sierra box, but considering the G16 is probably being split from a vitara manual in order to be bolted to a smaller flywheel, clutch and manual and it doesn't seem to make sense to me.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
steak_knife

az supporter
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 21335 Location: Smart Ass Island
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 8:02 am |
|
Gwagensteve wrote: The clutch and flywheel on a vitara box is way superior, and an adapter is eliminated. Granted the gearbox mount and jackshaft need work, but that's no more money than an adapter.
There's nothing inherently wrong with a sierra box, but considering the G16 is probably being split from a vitara manual in order to be bolted to a smaller flywheel, clutch and manual and it doesn't seem to make sense to me.
Steve.
spin's up quicker, & a clutch will last long time if geared & treated right...
_________________ I used to be indecisive,
now I'm not so sure.....
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 12997 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 8:54 am |
|
|
True, but a heavier flywheel is an advantage offroad.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
mcwilly
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 867 Location: nsw, newcastle
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:22 am |
|
|
Being different is all well and good and I'm the first to say go for it. However the expenses with being different skyrocket. Its alot easier and cheaper to go with the trialled and tested. Like many ppl have said how much power do u really need in a 4wd. When ur putting crawler gears to go slow u don't need a huge engine. If u want power build a race car
_________________ 1996 sierra + 2" body lift + SPOA conversion + ome
|
|
|
|
 |
matt91112011
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:05 am Posts: 241 Location: Eltham, Victoria
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:33 am |
|
mcwilly wrote: Being different is all well and good and I'm the first to say go for it. However the expenses with being different skyrocket. Its alot easier and cheaper to go with the trialled and tested. Like many ppl have said how much power do u really need in a 4wd. When ur putting crawler gears to go slow u don't need a huge engine. If u want power build a race car
Yeah but it's nice to actually be able overtake a slow car occasionally or not have to work the car just to keep up with traffic on hills, or have to drop back gears everytime you come up to a hill.
If I ever do an engine conversion, I'm not aiming for traction breaking power, but enough so I can do all of the things mentioned above easily.
All our cars are very underpowered.
Matty
|
|
|
|
 |
steak_knife

az supporter
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 21335 Location: Smart Ass Island
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 5:01 am |
|
Gwagensteve wrote: True, but a heavier flywheel is an advantage offroad.
Steve.
I like the quick spin, can't see the gain of a slower rev.... for what I drive....
_________________ I used to be indecisive,
now I'm not so sure.....
|
|
|
|
 |
|