Is my Sierra sitting at the standard ride height? Just seems to be an awful lot of air between the wheels and wheel arches... i'm not really fussed about it, just curious if it's been toyed with in the past.
| auszookers.com https://auszookers.com/forum/ |
|
| Standard height or not https://auszookers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=13962 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Che [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Standard height or not |
Is my Sierra sitting at the standard ride height? Just seems to be an awful lot of air between the wheels and wheel arches... i'm not really fussed about it, just curious if it's been toyed with in the past.
|
|
| Author: | alex [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
looks like its been lifted to me 
|
|
| Author: | 89_tintop [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Im with alex.... Does look lifted |
|
| Author: | foolsp33d [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
x3 LOOKS lifted especially the rear end.. any markings on the springs? If you want to measure (on FLAT ground) to the base of the door handle. The 'other forum' has a thread with the majority of members heights listed to this point. pretty sure their mods are also listed as a comparison.. Maybe we need an AZ What is your door handle height thread?  
|
|
| Author: | MacDaddy [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
89_tintop wrote: Im with alex.... Does look lifted
X 4 Definitely looks lifted to me ! 
|
|
| Author: | foonji [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Yeh the building does look lifted. |
|
| Author: | 89_tintop [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
foonji wrote: Yeh the building does look lifted.
Its got to have at least a 150inch lift.. |
|
| Author: | Fatzook [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
I reckon it has new standard height springs. |
|
| Author: | Che [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Here's a dodgy pic from my camera phone. Apart from the springs and shocks i'm lost with part names of the suspension assembly, but if you're in the know I guess this will be the money shot: 
|
|
| Author: | steak_knife [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Fatzook wrote: I reckon it has new standard height springs.
To many rum's mate??
thay look to be 2in lifted.. |
|
| Author: | Moph [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Shackles are standard; poly bushes; springs are definitely non-standard (stock was 4 leaf pack) - my bet is on 2" lifted OME's purely based on what mine looked like. If they are you might be able to read markings like this on the top side of the spring: 
|
|
| Author: | Che [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Nah, no markings as yours have Moph. Camera shows poor detail but the springs (and shocks) are looking pretty old and weary to me. Bushes are new - I think they needed replacing for the RWC when I bought it |
|
| Author: | SuziBlu [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Arn't standard springs falt, where as lifted curve like in the pics ? Im going withy Steky, 2" lift. |
|
| Author: | Gwagensteve [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Standard rear springs are definitely NOT flat. Che- thats about the height a sierra sits with a 2" lift in it and no weight in the back. Steve. |
|
| Author: | foonji [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 6:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Gwagensteve wrote: Standard rear springs are definitely NOT flat.
Mine are! 
They look like gabriel shocks too, commo/hiace combo! |
|
| Author: | SuziBlu [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 6:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Mine were. |
|
| Author: | steve [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 6:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
ah i love the CSI topics... The photo of te springs looks like there's kinks in the springs as there's gaps between them, which happens when you reset springs, but the clamp looks untampered with so maybe they are just two inch lifted springs. Looks pretty high though, like 3 inch lifted. ohwell.. come back and give us an update in a year and measurements and see if how much they sag
PS. how big are your tyres? |
|
| Author: | whincup [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 6:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
steve wrote: how big are your tyres?
was just about to ask that... looks similar height as mine with 215/75's on, with 2" lift, so im going to assume thats what you have |
|
| Author: | Che [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Monroe shocks, 10+ years old I reckon by the operating state of them. I know Sierras are a bouncy breed, but this thing is outta control - go over a bump and it takes a full 2 seconds to stop bouncing.... doesn't sound like much but it is when you're travelling at 20 bumps a second!!! I think the front springs are normal, only 4 a leaf pack. They look in better nick than the rears too. Anyway, measuring vertically through dead centre of wheel: Front 82.5cm to guard, Back 84cm to guard. |
|
| Author: | Moph [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Nope front springs are aftermarket if they're a 4 leaf pack - stock is 3 leaf. They're definitely lifted, look 2", have 1 leaf per pack more than stock and are not OME (just checked mine - different chamfer on spring end). |
|
| Author: | Che [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Tyres are as Whincup said - 215/75/15 Never noticed those gaps between the leaf sections before either... interesting |
|
| Author: | honks [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 10:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
just measured mine stocka it is 750mm through center of tyre to top of guard at the front on 205/70/15 and measures 765mm at the back must be 2" getting 215/75/15's fitted this week might take some measurements on the extra height from the bigger tyre and let you know |
|
| Author: | alien [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
definitely 2" lifted, and those arent standard shackles either - here's standard ones: 
|
|
| Author: | royce [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
They are king springs, thats what they look like when they are worn in nicely cause the smaller leaves have a bit more camber to em and that massive load leaf get a pic of the front, I'll bet the smallest leaf also has them rounded edges and isnt clamped fwiw they are great springs when you pull the short leaf out of all of em and get some good shocks in there, mine even had rounded edges where each leaf rubbed on teh next (took forever with a die grinder) and painted with graphite impregnated paint
|
|
| Author: | BlueSuzy [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Those shackles ARE standard! I have had 2 sierra's with rear shackles, channel on 1 side, flat plate on the other. Whats the measurement inbetween the bumpstops and chassis on flat ground, no weight in car. |
|
| Author: | Fatzook [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
BlueSuzy wrote: Those shackles ARE standard!
X2 |
|
| Author: | whincup [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Fatzook wrote: BlueSuzy wrote: Those shackles ARE standard! X2 X3... |
|
| Author: | alien [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 1:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
wow - never seen it here in perth, maybe an east coast thing? |
|
| Author: | Moph [ Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
Doubt it's an east coast thing Alien. The shackles in your photo are exactly the same as the ones on che_guitarra's rig. Here's some photos of the standard ones that were on mine, taken early in my RUF conversion to show various problems . Flat inner plate; channel outer plate with corners 45'd rather than rounded. Seen these on every stock Zook I've ever looked at.
|
|
| Author: | alien [ Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Standard height or not |
wow thats amazing - i've never seen that before! |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 9:30 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|