auszookers.com
https://auszookers.com/forum/

4 to 1 vs 4 to 2
https://auszookers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1589
Page 1 of 1

Author:  the_orb [ Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:48 am ]
Post subject:  4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

is there any difference between 4 to 1 and 4 to 2 extractors, apart from $60?

Author:  royce [ Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

4>2>1 give a lower power gain, but over a wider range
4>1 give a higher power gain but in a narrower (higher) rev band

unless you are sitting in a narrow band all day long (say like a race car or on the highway all day) I would go 4>2>1

Author:  GRPABT1 [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

Like mentioned above 4-1 make power high up, which would suit the small revvy zook motors. BUT in a 4B you want all the low down torque you can get so stick with 4-2-1's, you'll still get decent power gains over stock.

Author:  the_orb [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

4 to 1 sounds the go, i need it for highway speed

the drover im taking it off does not have a cat, is that legal? if so it will make installation easier coz there will only be one weld

Author:  cj_zuki [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

As a generalisation the 4 to 1 tends to be designed for a specific rev range but will deliver more power in that range where as the Tri-Y will deliver a lower power level but spread over a larger range. This does not mean that the 4 to 1 is a high rpm range design but it is more commonly found in that application as it is ideal for things like circuit racing. The thing is that a header should be designed around a specific set of engine criteria and a poorly designed 4 to 2 to 1 will not be as good as well designed 4 to 1. If you change anything on your engine you then need to redesign the header but in reality 99% of people will just buy what is available off the shelf and settle for whatever that delivers.

Author:  the_orb [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

cj_zuki wrote:
As a generalisation the 4 to 1 tends to be designed for a specific rev range but will deliver more power in that range where as the Tri-Y will deliver a lower power level but spread over a larger range. This does not mean that the 4 to 1 is a high rpm range design but it is more commonly found in that application as it is ideal for things like circuit racing. The thing is that a header should be designed around a specific set of engine criteria and a poorly designed 4 to 2 to 1 will not be as good as well designed 4 to 1. If you change anything on your engine you then need to redesign the header but in reality 99% of people will just buy what is available off the shelf and settle for whatever that delivers.


yeah thats me i just want to be able to sit on 100 on our upcoming road trip.

any thoughts on the cat?

Author:  cj_zuki [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

Cats generally don't provide that much of a restriction. If you want, go up one size compared to the pipe you are running and you will be fine.

Author:  joshNZ [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

just get any you wont be able to tell the difference when u get them.

Author:  the_orb [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

shod be getting them Friday after work. installing as soon as i can find a welder

Author:  steve [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

joshNZ wrote:
just get any you wont be able to tell the difference when u get them.


i think this'd be about right. ..and i reckon you'd find it hard to actually pick the difference between extractors and none at all.

I've never been a beleiver in extractors, since i got some for the hilux and the dude said they'd be the best thing i'd ever do, and i drove up the road, and it made no difference at all, and sounded like an old torana :(

Author:  royce [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

yeah but thats a diesel

my 4>1 were probably the reason my 1.3 used to beat your 1.6 on the highway :P

Author:  steve [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

nah, that was coz your cars are just better than mine. I always get the special edition slow version of everything. Bear's hilux, exactly the same motor use to beat mine easy.

Author:  royce [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

stick some windex..oops I mean diesel power in that will fix it

bugger, tech posts about a hilux, I better go ban myself now

Author:  joshNZ [ Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

there'd be no way extractors made a 1.3 beat a 1.6,i had a 1.3 with extractors and mine bet a 1.6 with extractors,if u put a turbo on then youll feel a difference

Author:  royce [ Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:18 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

well it did used to pull pretty hard at 4000rpm, but what would I know

Author:  joshNZ [ Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2

i wouldnt no either

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 9:30 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/