| auszookers.com https://auszookers.com/forum/ |
|
| 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 https://auszookers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1589 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | the_orb [ Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
is there any difference between 4 to 1 and 4 to 2 extractors, apart from $60? |
|
| Author: | royce [ Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
4>2>1 give a lower power gain, but over a wider range 4>1 give a higher power gain but in a narrower (higher) rev band unless you are sitting in a narrow band all day long (say like a race car or on the highway all day) I would go 4>2>1 |
|
| Author: | GRPABT1 [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
Like mentioned above 4-1 make power high up, which would suit the small revvy zook motors. BUT in a 4B you want all the low down torque you can get so stick with 4-2-1's, you'll still get decent power gains over stock. |
|
| Author: | the_orb [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
4 to 1 sounds the go, i need it for highway speed the drover im taking it off does not have a cat, is that legal? if so it will make installation easier coz there will only be one weld |
|
| Author: | cj_zuki [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
As a generalisation the 4 to 1 tends to be designed for a specific rev range but will deliver more power in that range where as the Tri-Y will deliver a lower power level but spread over a larger range. This does not mean that the 4 to 1 is a high rpm range design but it is more commonly found in that application as it is ideal for things like circuit racing. The thing is that a header should be designed around a specific set of engine criteria and a poorly designed 4 to 2 to 1 will not be as good as well designed 4 to 1. If you change anything on your engine you then need to redesign the header but in reality 99% of people will just buy what is available off the shelf and settle for whatever that delivers. |
|
| Author: | the_orb [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
cj_zuki wrote: As a generalisation the 4 to 1 tends to be designed for a specific rev range but will deliver more power in that range where as the Tri-Y will deliver a lower power level but spread over a larger range. This does not mean that the 4 to 1 is a high rpm range design but it is more commonly found in that application as it is ideal for things like circuit racing. The thing is that a header should be designed around a specific set of engine criteria and a poorly designed 4 to 2 to 1 will not be as good as well designed 4 to 1. If you change anything on your engine you then need to redesign the header but in reality 99% of people will just buy what is available off the shelf and settle for whatever that delivers.
yeah thats me i just want to be able to sit on 100 on our upcoming road trip. any thoughts on the cat? |
|
| Author: | cj_zuki [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
Cats generally don't provide that much of a restriction. If you want, go up one size compared to the pipe you are running and you will be fine. |
|
| Author: | joshNZ [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
just get any you wont be able to tell the difference when u get them. |
|
| Author: | the_orb [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
shod be getting them Friday after work. installing as soon as i can find a welder |
|
| Author: | steve [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
joshNZ wrote: just get any you wont be able to tell the difference when u get them.
i think this'd be about right. ..and i reckon you'd find it hard to actually pick the difference between extractors and none at all. I've never been a beleiver in extractors, since i got some for the hilux and the dude said they'd be the best thing i'd ever do, and i drove up the road, and it made no difference at all, and sounded like an old torana |
|
| Author: | royce [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
yeah but thats a diesel my 4>1 were probably the reason my 1.3 used to beat your 1.6 on the highway |
|
| Author: | steve [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
nah, that was coz your cars are just better than mine. I always get the special edition slow version of everything. Bear's hilux, exactly the same motor use to beat mine easy. |
|
| Author: | royce [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
stick some windex..oops I mean diesel power in that will fix it bugger, tech posts about a hilux, I better go ban myself now |
|
| Author: | joshNZ [ Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
there'd be no way extractors made a 1.3 beat a 1.6,i had a 1.3 with extractors and mine bet a 1.6 with extractors,if u put a turbo on then youll feel a difference |
|
| Author: | royce [ Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
well it did used to pull pretty hard at 4000rpm, but what would I know |
|
| Author: | joshNZ [ Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 4 to 1 vs 4 to 2 |
i wouldnt no either |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 9:30 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|