| Author |
Message |
BJPK
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 786 Location: perth
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:08 am |
|
|
i was always pretty sure that g16bs are non interference engines?
for this reason i have been putting of the cam belt. but if somebody proves they are not then id better get around to doing it.
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:51 am |
|
|
All factory G series motors are free spinners AFAIK.
I've seen a G 16B break a timing belt and I can assure you it was a free spinner because it took us about 6 hours to figure out why it wouldn't run....
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
shandy92

az supporter
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 5066 Location: perth, Australia
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:19 am |
|
|
hmmm ok, this is good to know. i have a haynes manual, i have had a look but cant find anything info on it being a interference engine or not. any ideas on where i can?
i was always told that it was just the G13 engines that were non-interference engine.
Mitch
|
|
|
|
 |
89_tintop

az supporter
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 3159 Location: gold coast
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 6:51 pm |
|
|
Just googled the question and every post says the same thing....
Non interference
|
|
|
|
 |
Ben_Sierra

az supporter
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4472 Location: Perth
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:29 pm |
|
|
The only G engine which is an interference engine is the G13B.
_________________ I want my old sig back 
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:40 pm |
|
|
ben - g13b or g13bb? or both?
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:51 am |
|
|
|
 |
losfer

az supporter
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 977
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 2:49 am |
|
|
g16b is interference hate to say people ....
|
|
|
|
 |
Ben_Sierra

az supporter
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4472 Location: Perth
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 3:44 am |
|
alien wrote: ben - g13b or g13bb? or both?
G13B...
Cos of the twin cam.
_________________ I want my old sig back 
|
|
|
|
 |
matty87
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 794 Location: the wild west
Vehicle: 1987 sierra tray back buggy
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 3:56 am |
|
Ben_Sierra wrote: alien wrote: ben - g13b or g13bb? or both? G13B... Cos of the twin cam.
why Because of the twin cam?
Not disputing it just asking why.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ben_Sierra

az supporter
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4472 Location: Perth
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:27 am |
|
|
I dunno if its just bacause its a twin cam, but the twin cam head is an interference design...
_________________ I want my old sig back 
|
|
|
|
 |
matty87
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 794 Location: the wild west
Vehicle: 1987 sierra tray back buggy
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:49 am |
|
|
can anyone explain why Suzuki made the g13b twin cam head interference design. i find it odd that the rest of the series is free running but they decided to do it this way with the 13b. i dont see that the fact it is twin cam should dictate this design change or am i missing something?
|
|
|
|
 |
royce

omnipotent being
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 17216 Location: Pluto
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:53 am |
|
|
more valves, higher compression, valves get closer to teh piston tops
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:54 am |
|
this explains it well:
No Valve/Piston Interference
Valve/Piston Interference
and this seems pretty good at telling you if its interference or not: http://www.gates.com/part_locator/index ... on_id=3598
g13a - non-interference
g16a - non-interference
g16b - INTERFERENCE
theres no real data on the jimny, but if that trend flows through would mean if its a 16 valve engine, its interference - which would makes sense given the limited space in there =)
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
matty87
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 794 Location: the wild west
Vehicle: 1987 sierra tray back buggy
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:57 am |
|
|
oh k higher compression engine that would explain it, cool thanks for the explanation.
yeah i know what is meant by interference and non interference. dont know anything about the g13b so i didnt realize it was higher compression.
Last edited by matty87 on Sun Oct 24, 2010 6:00 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
|
|
 |
shandy92

az supporter
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 5066 Location: perth, Australia
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:58 am |
|
losfer wrote: g16b is interference hate to say people ....
what makes you say that? as everyone else is saying its not...even google!
|
|
|
|
 |
royce

omnipotent being
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 17216 Location: Pluto
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 6:04 am |
|
|
gates says it is, most multi valve engines are
|
|
|
|
 |
losfer

az supporter
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 977
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 6:08 am |
|
|
ive worked on more suzuki engines than most people have had hot dinners , g13b is interference , g16b is interference ..
|
|
|
|
 |
want33s

az supporter
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 8134 Location: Sunshine Coast Qld
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 6:09 am |
|
|
My G16B is not interference... I've wound it over by hand without cam belt fitted a few times..
|
|
|
|
 |
royce

omnipotent being
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 17216 Location: Pluto
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 6:13 am |
|
want33s wrote: My G16B is not interference... I've wound it over by hand without cam belt fitted a few times..
are you certain at least 1 inlet valve is fully open? and now not bent 
|
|
|
|
 |
|