DarkHorse wrote:
Only thing to bear in mind of course is the bit of extra weight on the rear springs, may ride a touch lower.
just replace all the glass with polycarbonate, should lighten it up a tad
It would be nice.
| auszookers.com https://auszookers.com/forum/ |
|
| Vit Question :) https://auszookers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=19146 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | stocker [ Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Vit Question :) |
Just wondering if the Calmini Kit for the SWB Vit's are interchangable with the LWB Kits |
|
| Author: | atari4x4 [ Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vit Question :) |
yes. |
|
| Author: | buzbox [ Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vit Question :) |
I'm quite sure they are, after all they're the same chassis, just shorter. |
|
| Author: | stocker [ Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vit Question :) |
kk, so its just the body lift that is different? |
|
| Author: | atari4x4 [ Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vit Question :) |
yeas, the SWB has 2 less fixed body studs = 2 less blocks & 2 less female bolts |
|
| Author: | stocker [ Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vit Question :) |
Cheers gus |
|
| Author: | DarkHorse [ Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vit Question :) |
Only thing to bear in mind of course is the bit of extra weight on the rear springs, may ride a touch lower. |
|
| Author: | christover1 [ Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vit Question :) |
DarkHorse wrote: Only thing to bear in mind of course is the bit of extra weight on the rear springs, may ride a touch lower.
just replace all the glass with polycarbonate, should lighten it up a tad
It would be nice. |
|
| Author: | Buddies72 [ Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vit Question :) |
I've found the springs on the back bottom out when fully loaded on my LWB. Other than the weight factor, there's no difference. |
|
| Author: | atari4x4 [ Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vit Question :) |
DarkHorse wrote: Only thing to bear in mind of course is the bit of extra weight on the rear springs, may ride a touch lower.
when fitted to a SWB, the rear usually sits higher than the front, chop's LWB sits pretty level. |
|
| Author: | Joe [ Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vit Question :) |
atari4x4 wrote: DarkHorse wrote: Only thing to bear in mind of course is the bit of extra weight on the rear springs, may ride a touch lower. when fitted to a SWB, the rear usually sits higher than the front, chop's LWB sits pretty level. Yeah mine sits heaps high at the back |
|
| Author: | atari4x4 [ Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Vit Question :) |
i permanently carry a box of tools/recoverygear/spares to add a bit of weight over the back axle to get some ride comfort back... probably 50kg, i don't run rear seats & it still sits a little high in the rear. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 9:30 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|