| auszookers.com https://auszookers.com/forum/ |
|
| Intercooling https://auszookers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2537 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Zook_Fan [ Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Intercooling |
Has anyone ever intercooled their sierra? What sought of benefits does it bring? What sought of cost does it bring? Is it only necesary with turbo's? |
|
| Author: | Ashley [ Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Intercooling |
only turbos man. Cause they blow very hot air into the engine. Probably cause you to lose power on an NA sierra, just because it would restrict the air flow. |
|
| Author: | Scrawny [ Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Intercooling |
Intercooling is only nessasary with turbos. Do some research on the net and you will find out how and why and where. And no they don't work strung out the front like all the ricers do cos it was on that movie. Small pet peeve of mine |
|
| Author: | Zook_Fan [ Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Intercooling |
what movie? doesnt matter thanks for helping me out |
|
| Author: | zookkid [ Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Intercooling |
the fast and the furious lol |
|
| Author: | Mike [ Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Intercooling |
those movies are gay give me running on empty or mad max any day |
|
| Author: | Zook_Fan [ Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Intercooling |
nah i have to admit i have all three of the fast and furious movies |
|
| Author: | foolsp33d [ Sat Jul 19, 2008 6:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Intercooling |
Mike wrote: those movies are gay give me running on empty or mad max any day LOVE runnin On Empty! picked it up for $8. a few months ago on DVD. bARGAIN! "Whats ya name?" Quote: "Piss off!"
"Piss off? What type of a name is that?" "Its polish. Pissov's a Polish name!" "OK sheryl, getcha gear off" "not now Ram, ya so slow" "a polak and a spag! what are ya trying to do? lower housing prices!" mike - "she still snatches in second" tony - "yeah, i know" mike - "she winds up ok, but,,, i'm just loosing too much on the changes" tony - "yeah , you would do" mike - "yeah,,, so waddaya reckon?" tony - "she still snatches in second" mike - "yeah that just could be it!!!" |
|
| Author: | Hybrid [ Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Intercooling |
Dont forget superchargers guys. They need a dirty ricer intercoolers too lol. Unless your running low enough boost pressure. Zook Fan the basis of forced induction is to increase the pressire of the inlet air. The higher the pressure, the more oxygen molecules there are to be used in combustion. More oxygen (and more fuel of course) means more power. Of course physics steps in and ruins it. Increasing pressure increases temperature. Hotter intake air leads to all kinds of dramas. So after the air is pressurised it is passed through the intercooler to try to wash off some of this heat energy. The idea is to try and get it at or below room temperature before entering the engine. Because non turbo'd/supercharged engines are taking in uncompressed intake air they are already at room temp. So no need for an intercooler. As for having them mounted in front as opposed to mounting on top of course it works better. It is in the direct path of the coolest air flow and doesnt have to worry about heat soak from the engine bay, epsecially the top of the engine. |
|
| Author: | Fatzook [ Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Intercooling |
Hybrid wrote: Dont forget superchargers guys. They need a dirty ricer intercoolers too lol. Unless your running low enough boost pressure. Zook Fan the basis of forced induction is to increase the pressire of the inlet air. The higher the pressure, the more oxygen molecules there are to be used in combustion. More oxygen (and more fuel of course) means more power. Of course physics steps in and ruins it. Increasing pressure increases temperature. Hotter intake air leads to all kinds of dramas. So after the air is pressurised it is passed through the intercooler to try to wash off some of this heat energy. The idea is to try and get it at or below room temperature before entering the engine. Because non turbo'd/supercharged engines are taking in uncompressed intake air they are already at room temp. So no need for an intercooler.
As for having them mounted in front as opposed to mounting on top of course it works better. It is in the direct path of the coolest air flow and doesnt have to worry about heat soak from the engine bay, epsecially the top of the engine. I concur with all of this. IC is in most conditions, better at the front. Thats where mine was... Peter |
|
| Author: | Scrawny [ Sat Jul 19, 2008 2:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Intercooling |
I agree, out front is better. Expect it needs to be recessed so there is a ram air effect. Most guys just have it tacked on the front and cut away bumpers to make it fit, this just adds an extra crumple zone Air molecules are lazy, if it is easier to go around something they will. If the intercooler is recessed and ducted then the molecules have no choice but to go through.. |
|
| Author: | Damo [ Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Intercooling |
ScrawnC wrote: I agree, out front is better. Expect it needs to be recessed so there is a ram air effect. Most guys just have it tacked on the front and cut away bumpers to make it fit, this just adds an extra crumple zone
Air molecules are lazy, if it is easier to go around something they will. If the intercooler is recessed and ducted then the molecules have no choice but to go through.. Is that why radiators have a fan shroud? |
|
| Author: | Scrawny [ Sat Jul 19, 2008 3:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Intercooling |
You'd be suprised how much of a difference a shroud makes to some cars, particulary if the fan is a long way from the radiator (ie;Pootrol 4 cylinder diesel) I'm probably preaching to the choir though |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 9:30 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|