auszookers.com
https://auszookers.com/forum/

Suzuki Sierra LWB rear leaf difference?? :s
https://auszookers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=40385		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  jim_dover [ Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Suzuki Sierra LWB rear leaf difference?? :s
Hi all.

Just looking to get a new set of rear springs for my LWB and noticed there is a difference in SWB->LWB well the code is different anyway.
SWB Code= suz-008
LWB Code= suz-009

Is there a difference between the two? Thinking there might be as the -008 are shagged only after a very short amount of time on the LWB, less then a year of Road Use. I have gotten eye-eye measurements or anything to compare the two. Any input would be appreciated.

Thanks Nick
Author:  want33s [ Fri Apr 19, 2013 5:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Suzuki Sierra LWB rear leaf difference?? :s
The LWB rears will have a slightly higher rate because a LWB is a little heavier than a SWB.
LWB load capacity is actually less than a SWB though.
Author:  jim_dover [ Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Suzuki Sierra LWB rear leaf difference?? :s
want33s wrote:
The LWB rears will have a slightly higher rate because a LWB is a little heavier than a SWB.
LWB load capacity is actually less than a SWB though.



Ok thanks. Thought it was strange that they have a lower weight capacity kinda of a fuck up on Suzuki's behalf I reckon :s ill go with the correct spring as I plan on adding a bit of weight in the back any way.
Author:  sideways [ Sat Apr 20, 2013 2:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Suzuki Sierra LWB rear leaf difference?? :s
Assuming we're talking king springs, Suz-008 is the code for lifted LWB springs. Suz-009 is the lifted spring for traybacks/the H/D spring for LWBs.

I had Suz-006s and they were abolute bullsht stiff, I can't imagine what an 009 is like like! 8O
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 9:30 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/