| auszookers.com https://auszookers.com/forum/ |
|
| extractor difference? https://auszookers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=4448 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Chop [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | extractor difference? |
I'm doing a the 1.6 conversion at the moment and my sierra extractors are "tuned" 4 into 1 style. The ones off the donor engine are "Tri-y" style. Now too my knowledge, "tuned" are better for top end performance and "tri-y" for low end and torque. Has anyone managed to try both on the 1.6 and would the difference if any be much? I'll probably try the "tuned" ones that are on my car first anyway. Chop |
|
| Author: | something_else [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: extractor difference? |
the difference would'nt be noticeable, maybe on paper it is. or you might feel a slight difference in low down torque if you really try and feel it. |
|
| Author: | Westie [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: extractor difference? |
Std Sierra to a 1.6 mate you will think it is a V8 anyway.m If it was and EFI you would think it was turbo as well. Enjoy... but use it for the right reasons. |
|
| Author: | Chop [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: extractor difference? |
Yeah, its only a carb 1.6 but it is 70,000 km's less than my tired one LOL Chop |
|
| Author: | The_GRIZZ [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: extractor difference? |
I've got extractors on my 1.6 carb and haven't noticed much, it revs freer and it gives out a much nicer exhaust note but that's about it |
|
| Author: | datso [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: extractor difference? |
4 into 1s are not as good as 4-2-1 for torque but better on the freeways, quality is never really there with mass production you rarely get match porting. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 9:30 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|