| Author |
Message |
jonfromhamilton
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 2:11 pm Posts: 410 Location: Pakenham
Vehicle: SJ51T
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2017 1:33 pm |
|
|
_________________ Humble beginnings
|
|
|
|
 |
jdk81
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2372 Location: Ballarat, VIC
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2017 5:38 pm |
|
|
How many km had it done? How hard was it used?
My 7.2s failed the same way after 70, 000 km. Wasnt abused too much, but near the end got punished a little.
|
|
|
|
 |
jonfromhamilton
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 2:11 pm Posts: 410 Location: Pakenham
Vehicle: SJ51T
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2017 6:16 pm |
|
|
Im a pretty conservative driver, never bent any transfer mounts. They failed when i was slowly accelerating on the road in a 60k zone with open diffs so it wasn't an isolated thing it was long term damage as wxplained in the video. I did contact trail tough and the best they could offer was $100 off a new gear and i had to pay for postage back to them and then back to me! Losers
_________________ Humble beginnings
|
|
|
|
 |
just_cruizin

az supporter
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 2867 Location: here
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2017 7:51 pm |
|
|
And they don't sell individual spares. LROR do for their 6.5's
_________________ greenzook89 wrote: 31zook wrote: Makes me want something similar
|
|
|
|
 |
jdk81
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2372 Location: Ballarat, VIC
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:12 am |
|
|
The counters are all wear and tear items imo.
The bigger the ratio, the bigger the loads, the more rotational load that cause the gears/shafts/thrust washers to wear. Once they wear and rotate a little, it can move more, meaning less contact area and then contact areas wear faster. Its a slippery slope.
Id like to see how they all wear over time
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2017 9:27 am |
|
|
Touch wood my Calmini 5.14's have been going strong for 8 years of daily driving...
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
jdk81
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2372 Location: Ballarat, VIC
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2017 10:33 am |
|
|
Have you opened it to check the thrust washers and needle bearings etc?
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2017 10:11 pm |
|
|
Of course not... Pavlov's cat and all that.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
jonfromhamilton
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 2:11 pm Posts: 410 Location: Pakenham
Vehicle: SJ51T
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2017 10:22 pm |
|
|
Aside from being uniformly oversize, the ID on the TT counter gear is spotless
_________________ Humble beginnings
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2017 4:13 pm |
|
jonfromhamilton wrote: uniformly oversize Huh? I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT GOES ON WITH QUALITY CONTROL IN THIS INDUSTRY My TT 6.4's have been hated on for years and apart from being a little noisy from all the pitting on the gears, caused by me filling the thing full of water/mud twice and rusting the gears up, is perfect. One minute I hear trail gear spools are junk, then they're good. Then I hear trail tough spools are good, then they're junk. I've had a fantastic run out of all my TT stuff, but it's all old. It seems like these "random" failures aren't random at all and basic quality control (dimensional and surface hardness) checks would catch most of these problems.
|
|
|
|
 |
jonfromhamilton
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 2:11 pm Posts: 410 Location: Pakenham
Vehicle: SJ51T
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:58 pm |
|
|
I mean there is no sign of wear or ovalling or anything on the internal surfaces of the counter gear but it is oversize from end to end. I probably left it way too long to put the burn video up... oh well sometimes its hard to do stuff
_________________ Humble beginnings
|
|
|
|
 |
|