Can get a wide variety of 31x10.5 or 33x10.5, but the 32 is missed ... gotta go straight to 11.5.
The 235/85 16s are high ply-rated. ... although at least on a zook a puncture won't matter much ....
| auszookers.com https://auszookers.com/forum/ |
|
| Skinny tyres vs wide tyres https://auszookers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=54294 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| Author: | Angus Martin [ Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Hey guys, getting a set of 33s soonish and I'm tossing up between the 33x10.5 km2s and 33x12.5 claws. Anyone with experience with either feel free to comment on how they go in different terrains (mud, rock, road) Also looking for general pros and cons of skinny tyres vs wide tyres. Cheers. |
|
| Author: | alien [ Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Narrower the better. A lot of the guys are swinging over to 16" rims to go even skinnier! |
|
| Author: | chris77 [ Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
I am considering Federal Couragia in a 235/85R16 size for a 413 . Anyone run this size tyre ? Would be interested in comments . |
|
| Author: | MrRocky [ Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Based on my personal experiance rocks/crawling ive found the wider tyres offer better traction and narrower tyres for sand and trails. I have run 235/85r16 in summit mud hog and hankook mt and find them a good all rounder and quiet on road compared to 32x11.5r15s ive had |
|
| Author: | suzukikid [ Fri Jun 09, 2017 4:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
I ran 34 10.5 for years! Now running 31 9.5 and the difference is unbelievable! I seriously think it's more capable on the 31s.... not sure why I spent spent so much to get it reliable on the 34s |
|
| Author: | vet 180 [ Sun Jun 11, 2017 1:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
33 x 10.5 is a great option. |
|
| Author: | MrRocky [ Sun Jun 11, 2017 2:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Pity 33x10.5 tyre choice is so limited |
|
| Author: | tanshi [ Sun Jun 11, 2017 3:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Yeah if the choice is kn2 vs claws it bfg all the way. I run 10.5s and they are plenty wide enough |
|
| Author: | Gwagensteve [ Sun Jun 11, 2017 10:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
I'd struggle to think of a worse tyre for a sierra than a 33 12.5 Baja Claw. 33 10.5 BFG's work very well on a sierra. I desperately want someone to pony up and run 35 10.5 KR2 race bfg's on a sierra. I can't think of a better tyre. Wide tyres mostly suck on Sierras. Take this from a guy running 35 13.5's. |
|
| Author: | Eddy [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 8:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Intrigues me why no-one makes a 32 x 10.5 or 32x9.5 ... ?? |
|
| Author: | Gwagensteve [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 8:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
They do- but for a 16" rim. (235 85 16, 265 75 16) The 15" sizes are nearly all versions of the old floatation sizing "10r" "12r" etc which became popular in Southern California in the 1970's and the 4wd world has been dealing with it ever since Steve |
|
| Author: | Eddy [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Can get a wide variety of 31x10.5 or 33x10.5, but the 32 is missed ... gotta go straight to 11.5. The 235/85 16s are high ply-rated. ... although at least on a zook a puncture won't matter much ....
|
|
| Author: | tanshi [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Gwagensteve wrote: I desperately want someone to pony up and run 35 10.5 KR2 race bfg's on a sierra. I can't think of a better tyre. im eyeing off kr2s in a 37 for the buggy |
|
| Author: | Marko_SJ [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 12:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Eddy wrote: Can get a wide variety of 31x10.5 or 33x10.5, but the 32 is missed ... gotta go straight to 11.5. The 235/85 16s are high ply-rated. ... although at least on a zook a puncture won't matter much .... IIRC you can get a form of super swamper in 32*9.5. This was going to be my next tire. |
|
| Author: | Eddy [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 12:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Marko_SJ wrote: IIRC you can get a form of super swamper in 32x9.5.. Yeah ... I think I've seen that somewhere too .... absolutely useless to 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 % of us tho ...
|
|
| Author: | henno [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Gwagensteve wrote: I desperately want someone to pony up and run 35 10.5 KR2 race bfg's on a sierra. I can't think of a better tyre. So much want. When I accidentally trip over a huuuuuuge pile of cash it'll be alloy beadlocks and a set of these puppies. |
|
| Author: | Angus Martin [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Fair call guys, I've always been planning on running the km2s but seen some good performance from the mickeys up here |
|
| Author: | tanshi [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
all the times ive seen claws used they had super shit lateral grip. JR zook uses and loves km2s on lilfoot up in cairns area |
|
| Author: | Angus Martin [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Hmm can't say I know him, have a name for him? |
|
| Author: | shep [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
I am happy with KM2s as well. Dry season they are pretty good and don't seem to get sidewall damage, wet season they go well enough in sloppy silt shit and grip well on clay and black soil while working pretty well in monsoon rain on highways. I am on my second set and will prob buy again. Another thing I am pretty bad for airing down unless really needed and they don't chip apart like most tyres do on rocky roads |
|
| Author: | gregwatkins75 [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Dueller MTS are shit..... fyi Soft Wear quickly Wear unevenly Noisy as a 6yr old kid Very unsure on wet roads.. Don't have white writing in them.... |
|
| Author: | Eddy [ Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
gregwatkins75 wrote: Dueller MTS are shit..... fyi Don't have white writing in them....  
|
|
| Author: | epitam [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
What do you think about 255/85r16...? It's 33.5" tall ... but is it "skinny" enough?? It looks like a better option than 33"x10.5   Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk |
|
| Author: | jdk81 [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 7:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
They are a smidge narrower than the 33x10.5, 14mm bigger diam, but load rating is a fair bit more. 1550 kg vs 1180 kg |
|
| Author: | Gwagensteve [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
They work very well but there is less rim availability at helpful offsets and beadlocks and the load rating is a bit of an issue. 255 85 is an awesome sierra size though, no doubt. Couple of cars in our club running them. |
|
| Author: | Marko_SJ [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Eddy wrote: Marko_SJ wrote: IIRC you can get a form of super swamper in 32x9.5.. Yeah ... I think I've seen that somewhere too .... absolutely useless to 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 % of us tho ...They were Bias TSL now that I've searched. How so? I am assuming anyone looking at these sort of things is using the car pretty much solely off-road. |
|
| Author: | tanshi [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 11:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Angus Martin wrote: Hmm can't say I know him, have a name for him? Dan Haasman lives in Brisbane but regularly comes up there and wheels |
|
| Author: | epitam [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Gwagensteve wrote: They work very well but there is less rim availability at helpful offsets and beadlocks and the load rating is a bit of an issue. 255 85 is an awesome sierra size though, no doubt. Couple of cars in our club running them. Can some one upload pics of those sierras? (: Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk |
|
| Author: | Eddy [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 2:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Marko_SJ wrote: Eddy wrote: Marko_SJ wrote: IIRC you can get a form of super swamper in 32x9.5.. Yeah ... I think I've seen that somewhere too .... absolutely useless to 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 % of us tho ...They were Bias TSL now that I've searched. How so? I am assuming anyone looking at these sort of things is using the car pretty much solely off-road. |
|
| Author: | Marko_SJ [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Skinny tyres vs wide tyres |
Eddy wrote: Marko_SJ wrote: Eddy wrote: Marko_SJ wrote: IIRC you can get a form of super swamper in 32x9.5.. Yeah ... I think I've seen that somewhere too .... absolutely useless to 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 % of us tho ...They were Bias TSL now that I've searched. How so? I am assuming anyone looking at these sort of things is using the car pretty much solely off-road. No worries. Swamps are exactly where I used my sierra. 
|
|
| Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC + 9:30 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|