| Author |
Message |
sosilboy
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 65 Location: Sydney
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:26 am |
|
|
My Mate has a charade and its using heaps more than his?
|
|
|
|
 |
the_orb
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 171 Location: Canberra
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:32 am |
|
|
as far as I can tell its just the mystery of the sierra...........
my 1.3 has worse fuel economy than the v6 patrol
_________________ [img]http://www.auszookers.com/modules/coppermine/
|
|
|
|
 |
ANDY_M
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 127 Location: was Brissy now back
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:58 am |
|
|
v6 patrol??? my 1.3 gets 10L/100km...
_________________ WM MOTORSPORT. Brendale, PH:(07) 3205 1951
|
|
|
|
 |
michael
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 134 Location: Boyne Island
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:56 am |
|
|
I'd say getting in the region of 11-12 L per 100. I think my zook is running a bit rich though.
Remember though Sosilboy that the zook is revving it's ring-piece out and it's ballistic shape isn't really suited for fuel efficient running. Different gearing, body shape, driving styles etc all combine to make for poor fuel economy.
I think you should compare apples with apples though, a Charade isn't an off-road machine...
Having said all that, I must confess to being disappointed at the economy of the zook. My old '83 Pajero turbo wagon was getting a good if not better milage. Similar ballistic shape, probably at least half again as heavy, but was giving in the region of 28mpg on long hauls - and had 250K+ on the clock.
Still, I loves me zook....
Michael
|
|
|
|
 |
royce

omnipotent being
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 17216 Location: Pluto
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:03 pm |
|
my vit now gets 10l/100km with aircon on, 9.2 with it off
my old sierra, 1.3 3" suspension, 2" body, 31's and rockhopper used to get 11-12/100km but you had to drive it hard to get anywhere
my 82 1 litre hardtop with same mods but 1 litre and 4speed got bang on 10l/100km regardless of what you did or where you went, you could set your calculator by it
driving style has a lot to do with it, back off a notch and take a few minutes longer to get there will see you saving heaps, as will making sure its tuned spot on
|
|
|
|
 |
Jimny
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 163 Location: Gordonvale, North Qu
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:49 pm |
|
I'm getting 450km out of a 40L tank and having the aircon on makes very little difference but I attribute this performance to the Variable Valve Timing (VVT). Handy thing that VVT! 
_________________ Zooks Rule
2005 Jimny Z Series with VVT
[img]h
|
|
|
|
 |
the_orb
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 171 Location: Canberra
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:43 pm |
|
|
im on about 13L per 100Km, but the engine is not in great condition and I work as a delivery driver so it does heaps of stop starting
_________________ [img]http://www.auszookers.com/modules/coppermine/
|
|
|
|
 |
havoc_customs
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 3 Location: Carindale, Brisbane
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:28 pm |
|
|
mine gets 16lt per 100km. but i use my right foor a fair bit. its a 1lt with a 4spd
_________________ Yeah i got your 'Jeep' thing... now it burns when
|
|
|
|
 |
TZAR

az supporter
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 3459 Location: licking some windows
Vehicle: LJ20 LJ50
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:51 pm |
|
|
charade = 6 litres per 100 km
But it is gay
Also see brake thread
_________________ Camels have nice toes
|
|
|
|
 |
royce

omnipotent being
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 17216 Location: Pluto
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:53 pm |
|
I will just add that on a recent highway run from tenterfield to Brisbane I got 8.9l/100km from the vit 
|
|
|
|
 |
the_orb
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 171 Location: Canberra
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:29 pm |
|
|
*revive* does anyone know what the economy ratings were for zooks when they were new?
_________________ [img]http://www.auszookers.com/modules/coppermine/
|
|
|
|
 |
Bruce

az supporter
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4003 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:32 pm |
|
My daily driver (Lancer VRX) get 630km and takes about 36 to 39Lts to refill. (44lt tank)
Dam good I'd say 
_________________ [quote="royce"] I wouldnt mind insulating my rear
|
|
|
|
 |
terry
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 63
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:29 am |
|
|
My does too. I went and put a bigger fuel filter on mine from an early modle blue bird and replaced all fuel lines, and next step is to check the charcol filters to see if that makes a diff.
|
|
|
|
 |
|