| Author |
Message |
beef13
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 208 Location: Adelaide
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 4:52 am |
|
|
In all the other topics about sierra diesels most of the time it sounds as if there arent actually any upsides of putting one in a sierra.
SO, what would be the advantages and disadvantages (apart from needing stronger diffs and springs) of putting say a 2.8 hilux diesel in as opposed to a stock 1.3?
|
|
|
|
 |
Scrawny

I live here!
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 10528 Location: Brissie
Vehicle: Popemobile
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 12:39 pm |
|
|
I think the main reason is weight. Diesels are really heavy as opposed to the all alloy standard motors.
The 2.8 is gonna be too heavy for a Zook but smaller diesels will work ok. The other issue is legalities, engine capacity will dictate what you can or can't use.
I do like the idea of a diesel Zook. The Americans commonly use the VW 1.9L diesel.
|
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14498 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 12:42 pm |
|
|
that would be the 3rd worst motor that Toyota made. the other two are the
2.2 and 2.4 diesel very under powered crank bending pieces of snot.
have a look at the euro diesels they are smaller and make power more like a
petrol motor. i have seen a 1.9 vw powered sierra and it looked to be a neat
conversion and the owner reckoned that it worked well and there are kits
available for the conversion.
|
|
|
|
 |
gravity_powered
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 348 Location: Adelaide Hills
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 12:49 pm |
|
|
Benefits would be a huge improvement in torque low down in the rev range, meaning you would be able to go much slower over rocks and ruts.
Theoretically a diesel is more fuel efficient than a petrol motor but I think compared to a Suzuki motor it wouldn't make a difference.
Disadvantages, especially with a 2.8L motor would be weight, size and smell.
A smaller turbo diesel out of a Van or a sedan would be a better idea. Even the new Grand Vitara diesel is only 1.9L.
|
|
|
|
 |
lump_a_charcoal

az supporter
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 4454 Location: Botany, NSW
Vehicle: MY2019 Jimny
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 1:25 pm |
|
|
The major disadvantage is the lack of genuine options here...
You can buy kits to use the 1.9 TD VW motor, but it doesn't appear anywhere in AUS so parts will be hard to find.
|
|
|
|
 |
kenn
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 1202 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 1:47 pm |
|
|
Keep in mind the balance of the car and the dreaded GVM monster.
If it's low down torque you want look at getting some diff gears or a twin transfer set up ..just fft..
|
|
|
|
 |
beef13
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 208 Location: Adelaide
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 5:10 pm |
|
|
alright, so the hilux diesel is out of the question due to weight (expected that anyway), but if the VW 1.9 was transplanted how would it differ offroad, eg. hill climbing, highway speeds etc.
Basically all i want to do is get a bit more guts at higher speed goin up hills, at lower speeds its fine but on the road as soon as the engine sniffs any sort of incline it whines like all hell and generally end up in 3rd. Would new gearing in the transfer case be better? and could i get low gearing for offorad as well as higher gearing for faster speeds both in the transfer case?
|
|
|
|
 |
lump_a_charcoal

az supporter
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 4454 Location: Botany, NSW
Vehicle: MY2019 Jimny
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 5:24 pm |
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14498 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 5:32 pm |
|
every sierra needs the gearing changed. there are plenty of options.
most of the people i wheel with have standard gearing and 30's while i have
6.5 trans gears and 31's. they have to hit most things fast and hard to
get through it, i just idle through the same stuff. gearing makes a crap driver good. 
|
|
|
|
 |
Scrawny

I live here!
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 10528 Location: Brissie
Vehicle: Popemobile
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 5:40 pm |
|
shep wrote: gearing makes a crap driver good. 
So there's hope for me yet 
|
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14498 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 5:52 pm |
|
ScrawnC wrote: shep wrote: gearing makes a crap driver good.  So there's hope for me yet 
gearing + lockers make a crap driver awesome. 
|
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14498 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 6:47 pm |
|
nah i am just crap 
|
|
|
|
 |
Saam

az supporter
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 2068 Location: Sunshine Coast
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 6:50 pm |
|
|
this thread just got so much better
|
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14498 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 6:54 pm |
|
|
boobies make stuff great.
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 9:18 pm |
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:06 pm |
|
|
There's another problem with diesels that hasn't been mentioned here, and that's powerband and how it compromises gearing options.
A stock sierra runs at about 3500rpm @ 100kph.
Any diesel isn't going to be happy with this - ideally, and assuming it's an adequately powerful diesel, you'd want maybe 2500-2700rpm @ 100.
There's no real way of achieving this with sensible diff gears and a sierra transfer case. to give you an idea, to achieve 2500 of road cruise with a stock sierra transfer and diff gears will take a 37" tyre - and the stock crawl ratio will suck with 37's regardless of whether you have a diesel or a petrol.
Generally, you're giving up 2000rpm of powerband swapping to a diesel, so your getting 30% less out of each gear. Sure, torque can compensate to allow you into a taller gear - so long as you have a taller gear available, which, if you have anything like stock sierra gearing, you won't.
To the torque thing - it's easy to look at modern, common rail turbodiesels and think 300Nm will solve any problem, but they are all going to be amazingly complex to swap in. (they are also packed with electronics much more sophisticated than an EFI petrol engine) Most of the plausible engines you could choose from will have less than 200Nm of torque.
Lets use the 3L (2.8 hilux) diesel as an example, and compare it to a g16B EFI motor.
They both make the same power (65Kw)
The Diesel makes 180Nm @ 2400rpm
The petrol makes 130Nm @ 3500rpm
One is a simple swap, is well geared with crawler gears, easy to keep cool, and can be fitted with 3 speed or 4 speed automatics, or sierra or vitara manuals, and the other is 100% "out on your own" in regard to cooling, GVM (and especially front axle load) gearing....
Really the only way to get a 3L in comfortably will be with a hilux transfer case meaning a centred rear diff, and ideally an extended wheelbase. It's hard to imagine after all that work, the diesel being significantly better to drive than a G16B EFI, or significantly better than a hilux with that motor in it.
Often people cite the "simplicity" of a diesel over an EFI petrol as a reason to do a swap. I disagree. They are simple to hook up, and run for a long time, but diesel fuel pumps are mightily complex, and a feasible donor engine is probably going to be looking for a fuel pump rebuild in the near future.
Just some thoughts.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
beef13
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 208 Location: Adelaide
|
 Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:12 pm |
|
|
cheers Gwagensteve, dats great info, sure does help.
after i started the topic i started thinkin about all the extra bits i'd have to buy and figured it probably wasn't worth it anyway.
|
|
|
|
 |
bazook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 1082 Location: brisbane logan
|
 Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 12:27 am |
|
this place does the conversion if you really want to go that way
http://www.acmeadapters.com/
there was a video of a suzi with vw motor and runing vege oil but couldnt find it
|
|
|
|
 |
gusbus
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 9:08 am Posts: 96 Location: nrth bris
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:18 am |
|
|
some yanks are even putting vw 1.9 tdi into luxs,and yes there is a conversion kit from us for vw tdi into sierra have just seen on ebay an 05 model tdi 2 litre golf engine and 6 speed box for 1300 bucks am toying with the idea also
|
|
|
|
 |
gusbus
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 9:08 am Posts: 96 Location: nrth bris
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:23 am |
|
|
would it be legal though??
|
|
|
|
 |
Mick70b
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 9:14 am Posts: 265 Location: Sydney West
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:42 am |
|
|
A guy over here used to run a 1.8 litre Gemini (Isuzu) deisel in his sierra?
_________________ Virgil the Vitara
SV620 Estate
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 2:53 am |
|
Mick70b wrote: A guy over here used to run a 1.8 litre Gemini (Isuzu) deisel in his sierra?
We had a clubmember that ran a couple of Gemini 1.8's in his sierra. It was quite good, (Better than I would have expected) but working with tired old motors and problematic highway gearing meant a G13 ended up back in it.
We had another car in the club years ago that had been built with a 1.8 Isuzu but by the time it made its way to the club... sure enough, a G13 was back in it.
Steve.
As for Americans putting VW 1.9's in Hiluxes - that doesn't surprise me. They also try to put OM617 Merc diesels in everything that moves, and whilst they are a smooth, high revving diesel, they mke the same power as a 2.8 hilux.
The US market has only had a couple of small diesels available over the last 25 years. You guessed it - the VW TDI and the OM617.
|
|
|
|
 |
|