| Author |
Message |
maloo11
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:17 am Posts: 232 Location: NSW
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:42 am |
|
|
Trying to decide on good belly height for my lwb. What height (swb or lwb) are your zooks at? Please list mods you have used to acheive your height.
Im thinking around 17in. Wheelbase of 96in
_________________ 91Sierra; 2in lift; 2inBL; 6.5s; 31muds;
|
|
|
|
 |
11_evl
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 846 Location: logan reserve, Brisb
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 2:55 am |
|
|
im 20" and 110" WB
what size tyre you aiming for?
_________________ 92 sierra, 40" treps, full hydro, F&R steer, 106"W
|
|
|
|
 |
maloo11
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:17 am Posts: 232 Location: NSW
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 3:12 am |
|
|
only 33s. but want to be able to run 35 if i need to.
Thinking 3in springs, 1in shackes plus tyres should get me close to 17in
_________________ 91Sierra; 2in lift; 2inBL; 6.5s; 31muds;
|
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14498 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 3:14 am |
|
|
dunno because i don't have a tape measure that works in old fashioned units.
_________________ JEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEP
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 3:15 am |
|
|
no reason why your 2" spring, 2" bodylifted sierra cant run 33's right now with a bit of a guard chop and hammering...
you dont want to make the wheelbase too long or your rampover angle is going to suffer bigtime.
mines not here to measure, but on 31s with a roughly 200mm extended wheelbase i certainly wouldnt want to be any longer, i already have issues now and then bellying out.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
maloo11
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:17 am Posts: 232 Location: NSW
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 3:24 am |
|
|
I have another lwb im building, seperate car altogether. Its pretty stock now so just wanting to get all my plans worked out before i start.
_________________ 91Sierra; 2in lift; 2inBL; 6.5s; 31muds;
|
|
|
|
 |
got_bar_work
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 8:30 pm Posts: 2214 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: SQ625
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 3:27 am |
|
|
My vits at 14.5 " at 98"'wb and it drags it belly all the time
|
|
|
|
 |
31zook
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 9242 Location: maito
Vehicle: <3 Edna <3
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 3:44 am |
|
|
There is draw backs to any way you build, spoa will get you insantly better ramp over approach and departure, but suffer on side angles. low with chopped guards will get you great side angle but suffer ramp over etc etc....
if i was building a lwb on 33s it would be 50mm spring lift, guard chopped.
|
|
|
|
 |
ajsr

az supporter
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 3712 Location: melb
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:04 am |
|
|
so what exactly are we taking the measurements from?
the chassis or all the crap hanging below it? big difference
|
|
|
|
 |
94BAZOOKA
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:40 am Posts: 537 Location: central coast NSW
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:07 pm |
|
|
96" wheel base
22" to bottom of transfer
_________________ F#%ING [P] PLATER
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:12 pm |
|
|
should measure to the chassis rails at a certain point, as some people to transfer lifts or run different boxes etc... so while it might not be 100% accurate cos other shit hangs down, at least its a common spot to measure to.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
Red89
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 2801 Location: Perth
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:07 am |
|
alien wrote: should measure to the chassis rails at a certain point, as some people to transfer lifts or run different boxes etc... so while it might not be 100% accurate cos other shit hangs down, at least its a common spot to measure to. But that would be chassis hieght not belly hieght, my understanding is belly hieght means lowest point, whatever that may be on your vehicle. Anyway from memory Im at 22 inches with a flat belly, on 38s and 110 inch WB.
_________________ Made in JP. Built in WA.
|
|
|
|
 |
sideways

az supporter
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:53 pm Posts: 5936 Location: Northcliffe, W.A.
Vehicle: LJs, Sierra, Jimny, Swift.
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:07 am |
|
14.5" and 88" wheelbase.
Measured to the bottom of the chassis because LJ81s are awesome so no crap hangs down past it. 
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13008 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:40 am |
|
102WB
35's
16" to the lowest point on the chassis (other than the front spring hangers)
Mods to achieve the height? Flogged out OME front springs, slightly modified rear end
On my LWB 1.0 chassis, that lowest point is the bottom edge of the gusset where the chassis sweeps up towards the rear spring hangers.
You can see that point in this photo.
I haven't measured off the spring hangers because they are pretty much within the diameter of the tyre - it's pretty hard to get hung up on them in a "belly out" situation.
In any case maloo, what we're all running isn't really that relevant to you. You need to know what works on the terrain you are driving, not on the terrain we are driving.
From one area in Victoria to another my setup is either too long and low or just right. How that's relevant to NSW - I'm not sure.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
BlueSuzy

az supporter
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 9716 Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:31 am |
|
|
Mine will be <21" belly. 96' wb
_________________ BlueSuzy wrote: I'm over the G16b's.
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:42 am |
|
|
33's, 98"wb, 14-16" belly depending on coilover setup.
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
|