| Author |
Message |
Zook2510
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 3:24 pm Posts: 107
Vehicle: 2003 Jimny
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:54 am |
|
Hi guys, Looking at converting our 1.3L sierra to a G16B and wondering if there is much difference in terms of performance between a Baleno and Vitara G16B? Any difference in HP, torque etc. I've read that the Vit conversion is a little easier but I've found a Baleno engine and we already have a bit of experience with engine conversions so hopefully should be able to handle it Would greatly appreciate any advice as don't want to install a Baleno engine if the Vitara engine performs better.
|
|
|
|
 |
want33s

az supporter
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 8135 Location: Sunshine Coast Qld
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 6:45 pm |
|
|
Vit and Baleno are almost identical , power wise.
Inlet manifold and air intake/filterbox is the biggest difference.
If I were to do it again I'd prob use Baleno as I think the inlet is neater.
|
|
|
|
 |
losfer

az supporter
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 977
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 7:12 pm |
|
you can actually buy a hose that will connect a baleno throttle body directly to a sierra airbox . ive got a pic with it on a gti engine but the baleno is the same deal . it wasnt actually connected to the throttle body in this pic because i had a sr20 throttle body fitted which is much larger than the standard gti or baleno throttle body. Attachment: S5000802.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
|
|
|
|
 |
want33s

az supporter
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 8135 Location: Sunshine Coast Qld
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 6:04 am |
|
/\ Suzistore sell that inlet hose but from memory it isn't cheap.. Something like $170. 
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13002 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 6:36 am |
|
|
And sierra airboxes are pretty poorly designed and constructed. I don't think I'd spend that coin on a hose to connect to a worthless airboxes.
As to the baleno thing- I agree there's not much in the performance. The baleno is much neater, but only if you're able to do the water pipes neatly, which is a shittonne of work to get right.
Baleno is also coil pack, which makes me all warm and fuzzy.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
azzas15
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:43 pm Posts: 355
Vehicle: 89 Sierra Widetrack
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:17 am |
|
I went with the Baleno engine. As Steve mentioned If you spend the time on the hoses it will look great. I ran my hose back under the intake using some Camry hoses and a joiner. Some people will run it back over the exhaust but I think that looks terrible The power gain is also great! Still sorting a few bit out but it's driving me to work now 
|
|
|
|
 |
Zook2510
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 3:24 pm Posts: 107
Vehicle: 2003 Jimny
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 4:40 pm |
|
Thanks heaps for the info...hopefully will be picking up the baleno engine on the weekend! Let the fun begin 
|
|
|
|
 |
killazook

az supporter
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:37 pm Posts: 230
Vehicle: 92 wt soft top sierra
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:16 am |
|
Gwagensteve wrote: And sierra airboxes are pretty poorly designed and constructed. I don't think I'd spend that coin on a hose to connect to a worthless airboxes.
As to the baleno thing- I agree there's not much in the performance. The baleno is much neater, but only if you're able to do the water pipes neatly, which is a shittonne of work to get right.
Baleno is also coil pack, which makes me all warm and fuzzy.
Steve. Hi Steve you say that the sierra airbox is no good which I agree with and I was wondering what type (make/model) of airbox woupd be better suited for the task
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13002 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:37 am |
|
|
|
 |
killazook

az supporter
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:37 pm Posts: 230
Vehicle: 92 wt soft top sierra
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 1:53 pm |
|
|
|
 |
|