It is currently Sun Jun 07, 2026 5:56 pm
Board index » Talking About Stuff » N00b Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message

Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:14 am
Posts: 81
Location: Geelong
Vehicle: 1995 Suzuki Sierra SJ70

Post Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:01 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Petroworks make a bolt in 15 gallon tank for the Sierra. Thats 56L or extra 26L over the standard tank.
Has anyone used this tank, and if so how did it perform? What sort of fuel pump did you use?

Cheers

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:11 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Oberon, NSW
Vehicle: Drover pickup turk

Post Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:05 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
FYI stock is 40L

_________________
Quote:
I like the tuna here

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:14 am
Posts: 81
Location: Geelong
Vehicle: 1995 Suzuki Sierra SJ70

Post Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:10 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Ah, so only holds an extra 16L

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2015 10:50 am 
Reply with quote Top  
16L @ 10km/L is a decent increase in range though.

There's a few things you'd need to check going a bigger tank:
- Does it hang down lower? (you'll hit it on things)
- Does it clear your suspension setup?
- Does it meet ADRs? (There's rules on fuel tanks if you're worried about legalities)
- What's it made of? (ie: Aluminium will fatigue/crack, plastics aren't always UV rated...)

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 1522
Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: SJ80, SE416

Post Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2015 12:35 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
One of my Coilies had an 85L tank from Long Ranger. Used the stock filler pipe, pickup and gauge sender.

FYI stock is 42L.

Is your sierra cconverted to EFI?

 Profile WWW  

Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:14 am
Posts: 81
Location: Geelong
Vehicle: 1995 Suzuki Sierra SJ70

Post Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2015 2:26 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I'm about to start a Baleno conversion.
Petroworks tanks are DOT something rated polyethylene. Made in the USA though, so I'll have to check if they comply with ADR as I want my rig to be legal.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2015 5:32 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
When you find out, post back here as i'd be interested to know =) Be nice to fit more than 35L in my tank. lol

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:14 am
Posts: 81
Location: Geelong
Vehicle: 1995 Suzuki Sierra SJ70

Post Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 7:07 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
These are the Victorian requirements for replacement fuel tanks.

12.1.3 Replacement or Additional Fuel Tanks Replacement fuel tanks and drop tanks must meet the following requirements:

The vehicle must have a minimum ground clearance of 100mm and meet the minimum ground clearance requirements as defined in ADR 43

No part of any fuel tank or fuel system component must lie below a plane created as a component of that vehicle’s Departure Angle (Departure Angle is the greatest angle between the horizontal plane and the plane from the static loaded rear tyres to the lowest, rearmost extremity of the Original Equipment Manufacturer’s (OEM) permanent body work)

Any fuel tank or fuel system component must be at least 100mm inboard of the OEM permanent body work (excluding the filler neck and assembly)

Any fuel tank or fuel system component with a ground clearance of 200mm or less must be adequately protected by shields or adjacent vehicle components

In the event of any tyre being deflated, no parts of the fuel tank or fuel system may touch the road surface If a replacement tank of a 125% or larger capacity than the original uses the original mountings, their strength must be checked and shown to be adequate by a VASS Signatory

Replacement fuel tanks must not adversely affect the suspension travel, controllability, handling or road holding of the vehicle

The fuel filler inlet and cap should be located on the outside of the vehicle. Where an inlet is located inside a vehicle, it must not be inside the passenger compartment and the inlet must be separately sealed from the rest of the vehicle to ensure fumes do not enter the passenger cabin and that provisions are made to ensure any fuel spills are localized and drain outside the vehicle

The fuel tank and filler shall be so arranged that any overflow or leakage of fuel cannot accumulate or contact the exhaust or electrical systems Any apertures created to allow for the installation of the fuel tanks must be suitably sealed to prevent the entry of exhaust, road or petrol fumes into the cabin of the vehicle

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:14 am
Posts: 81
Location: Geelong
Vehicle: 1995 Suzuki Sierra SJ70

Post Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 7:18 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Also found part of ADR 43 relating to ground clearance;

43.4.4. 'Ground Clearance’

The 'Ground Clearance' of a vehicle, other than an L-Group vehicle, measured from a horizontal road surface to any point on the underside of the vehicle except the tyres, wheels and wheel hubs shall, under the conditions of ‘Maximum Loaded Test Mass' loading as specified in the relevant braking Rule, be not less than:

43.4.4.1. for any point in the. width of the vehicle which is within one metre fore and aft of any 'Axle', 100 mm;

43.4.4.2. for the mid-point between any 2 consecutive 'Axles', the dimension in millimetres obtained by multiplying the distance between the 2 'Axles' in metres by 33.33; and

43.4.4.3. for any other point, ‘Ground Clearance' such that if the wheels of one 'Axle' are on one plane and the wheels on the next consecutive 'Axle' are on another plane which intersect the first so that the angle between them is 7 degrees 38 minutes the point will pass over the apex transverse to the vehicle formed by that intersection, as shown in Figure 3.

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:14 am
Posts: 81
Location: Geelong
Vehicle: 1995 Suzuki Sierra SJ70

Post Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:03 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Having read over all that now I am sure the tank would pass on all points. I can see from photos that when mounted up it sits well above the bottom of the diff. My diff is 230mm above the road so there will be no problems with ground clearance.

The only point I am not certain about is:

"No part of any fuel tank or fuel system component must lie below a plane created as a component of that vehicle’s Departure Angle (Departure Angle is the greatest angle between the horizontal plane and the plane from the static loaded rear tyres to the lowest, rearmost extremity of the Original Equipment Manufacturer’s (OEM) permanent body work) "

Can anyone interpret that one clearly?

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:14 am
Posts: 81
Location: Geelong
Vehicle: 1995 Suzuki Sierra SJ70

Post Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:11 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I think it's worth sorting out if the Petroworks tank is legal here. The 'Long Ranger' brand tanks available here are $1000 AUS The Petroworks tanks are only $395US from LROR and considering I'm about to order parts from there the shipping will only be an extra $100

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm
Posts: 34843
Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's

Post Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:13 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
departure angle is the departure angle... from tyre to lowest rear most point.

_________________
You're just hating because you don't understand

 Profile WWW  

Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:14 am
Posts: 81
Location: Geelong
Vehicle: 1995 Suzuki Sierra SJ70

Post Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:47 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Yeah, so in the more simple terms, the tank cannot be mounted such that it crosses the departure angle.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm
Posts: 34843
Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's

Post Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 9:04 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
bingo

in saying that, i wonder if the long ranger tanks comply as they hang pretty low from memory?

_________________
You're just hating because you don't understand

 Profile WWW  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:55 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
on a sierra the lowest point on a pure departure plane is the rear shackle... the tank is quite tucked up when stock, its just in a vulnerable spot which is why we all dent them. If the tank mostly follows the profile of the rear springs you should be ok.

this image appears to see it cutting it close:
Image
From: http://www.expeditionportal.com/forum/t ... cks/page11

and this one:
Image
From: http://www.expeditionportal.com/forum/t ... le-Samurai

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2372
Location: Ballarat, VIC

Post Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 9:21 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Id be worried about staking the tank.
I've come close to staking my tank.
I have staked my front brake line (one that runs across the chassis supported by the plastic shroud)
Someone on the forum staked the floor and it was close to going through the passenger seat (it penetrated a dodgy weld repair) but very scary.

I wouldnt offroad with a poly tank mounted externally

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 10:39 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I think it'd be OK when its protected by what looks like 5-6mm plate.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm
Posts: 34843
Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's

Post Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 10:44 am 
Reply with quote Top  
i see lots of unproteced plastic...

_________________
You're just hating because you don't understand

 Profile WWW  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 7719
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 11:51 am 
Reply with quote Top  
not sure why you would want a bigger tank in a sierra.

a lot cheaper and easier to invest in a jerry can

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13001
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:33 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I'm interested in the legality stuff of this for other (Clive related) reasons, but here's my take.

It's expensive, freighted, least of which because you need the tank with the pump.

It's going to be $550+ and freight is going to sting you $200 easily. (it's bulky)

It's 16 litres extra, and depending on how accurate the gauge is, that might be 100km extra range... maybe even less.

It's no more space efficient - that 16 litres looks to be all below the stock tank. That tank is going to be an anchor, even if it's not damaged, it's going to drag everywhere.

You want a legal car. Therefore you need an engineers cert for the engine. Move a crossmember, and with your body lift, fit a SWB 2.0 tank. 55 litres from memory tucked up as high as possible and get that thrown on the cert too - It's not going to cost any more, and you can use it as an excuse to play with the rear shock mounts and pick up some droop.

If that's too hard, leave the spare at home and run a jerry on the back door.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm
Posts: 34843
Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's

Post Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:36 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
* SV vitara's = 70l capacity, approximately 66l useable.

_________________
You're just hating because you don't understand

 Profile WWW  

Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:14 am
Posts: 81
Location: Geelong
Vehicle: 1995 Suzuki Sierra SJ70

Post Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 8:50 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Hrmm the extra capacity was appealing but I agree it compromises the departure angle. I think i'll just buy a new (non-genuine) coily tank at $395 and be done with it. Would be good if the baleno pump is compatible.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:11 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Oberon, NSW
Vehicle: Drover pickup turk

Post Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 11:22 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Pretty sure Cairnszook used a Baleno pump and pickup/flange in a coily tank, Just lengthened the pickup tube.

_________________
Quote:
I like the tuna here

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:14 am
Posts: 81
Location: Geelong
Vehicle: 1995 Suzuki Sierra SJ70

Post Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 6:23 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Yeah, I think that will be the cheapest and easiest solution.
BTW, is there any reason I can't use the Baleno alternator? I have a complete Baleno donor car. The whole car is in good condition. Only done 130,000 k's

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2372
Location: Ballarat, VIC

Post Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 6:38 am 
Reply with quote Top  
You can use the baleno alt, and I would if I didnt have a falc alt installed.
Most people go a falcon alt for extra capacity, the baleno alt has some extra capacity over a Sierra, just not as much as the falcon alt.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13001
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 6:39 am 
Reply with quote Top  
No. Use the baleno alt. It has moar powers than the Sierra one.

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:48 pm
Posts: 814
Location: kinglake, VIC

Post Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 9:07 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Does anyone have any links to thise adrs.

Is there anything about the construction of the tank. I have a body lift and i reckon with a better shaped tank taking up the right space i coyld fit a heap more capacity in.

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2372
Location: Ballarat, VIC

Post Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 9:16 am 
Reply with quote Top  
If you have a BL, you can fit a lwb vit tank with a bit of squeeze, exhaust mods, filler hose mods and shock absorber tweaks (make a relocation bracket iirc b4t did this) or use a lror shock brace
I tweaked the shock placement 1st time around
I did a slight chassis extension second time around

You need to hack the sierra tank mounts off and fab your own.
It isnt overly hard and the extra capacity is awesome.

Biggest suck factor, is its extra weight behind the rear diff.
But it's lower than a jerry can in the back

Can pick up a lwb vit tank for about $50

My 4th iteration is a custom tank under and behind passenger seat, where the stock muffler used to be.

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:48 pm
Posts: 814
Location: kinglake, VIC

Post Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 11:19 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Cool ill have a look into this cheers

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 8:30 pm
Posts: 2214
Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: SQ625

Post Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 1:17 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Does any one know whats the rules are on custom tanks.
Does it need to be made by someone special or can any fab shop tig one up and do a pressure test as per engineer specs. Then just get the engineer to ok it when they do the rest of the car ?

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours