It is currently Fri Jul 31, 2026 9:00 pm
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ] 
Author Message

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:41 am
Posts: 23
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:28 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Hey Everyone,

I just bought a GME 3100 compact cb for my sierra. It was installed easily and so was the antenna, which i mounted onto the aluminium bull bar. My question is though...Would it have been better to mount the antenna on my suzies front fender on the little flat section right next to the front of the bonnet, almost directly above the headlight itself (If that makes sense). Its just that im not sure its performing as good as it could be, or whether i have done anything wrong during install. Would it act as a better receiver/transmitter in that position? If anyone could give me some pointers that would be very much appreciated as im not very radio savvy.

 Profile  

Offline
omnipotent being
omnipotent being
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 17216
Location: Pluto

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:47 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I had mine there way back on my 1 litre, if its as high on your bar youll probably not notice any difference to where it is now

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 818
Location: Sydney

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:47 am 
Reply with quote Top  
The best place for an antenna is in the middle of the roof, or even on a roofrack using a ground independent antenna. Nice and high clear of any body work. I can't see the value why people mount it near the spare wheel right next to the back door.

From my understanding on where you have it mounted at the moment, I can't see it making much difference between the bullbar or fender mount above the headlight, assuming they are at the same level.

_________________
2002 SWB GV
Lifted and Locked

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:41 am
Posts: 23
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:54 am 
Reply with quote Top  
i dont know if its a problem but i have a fiberglass hardtop and i would have to be sure where it went, i dont want to have a series of holes in it haha. i also have a roof basket, not sure if that changes anything. also, the distance between where it is now and as a maybe on the fender would be about 20cm taking it to just above the roof line.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:41 am
Posts: 23
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:03 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Would buying a longer antenna make it a better unit or does that have nothing to do with it?

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4472
Location: Perth

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:07 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Antenna theory is complex.

The length of an antenna often has more to do with frequency than gain.

Also, antennas acheive gain by focusing the radiation. A higher gain means a narrower beamwidth. On flat terrain a high gain antenna will give you a long range, but on hilly terrain a lower gain antenna will be better, as shown in the image below.

Image

_________________
I want my old sig back :(

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 818
Location: Sydney

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:10 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Robbo86 wrote:
i dont know if its a problem but i have a fiberglass hardtop and i would have to be sure where it went, i dont want to have a series of holes in it haha. i also have a roof basket, not sure if that changes anything. also, the distance between where it is now and as a maybe on the fender would be about 20cm taking it to just above the roof line.


I would place it at the edge of the roof basket so it's up high but you can still use the basket. Be aware though of carparks etc as you probably won't fit. You could always fab a hinge so you can stow the antenna when in carparks.

_________________
2002 SWB GV
Lifted and Locked

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:41 am
Posts: 23
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:10 am 
Reply with quote Top  
ok then, that gives me a bit of an understanding. The antenna i got from arb was a 6db gain and came with the elevated feed base aswell. so does that mean that in a suburban area that as an antenna mine wouldnt be too good its more for distance like your said, on flat terrain?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:41 am
Posts: 23
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:12 am 
Reply with quote Top  
oh ok cool thanks TheOtherLeft. A hinge set up might not be a bad idea at all if i end up moving it to the basket. cheers

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4472
Location: Perth

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:22 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Robbo86 wrote:
ok then, that gives me a bit of an understanding. The antenna i got from arb was a 6db gain and came with the elevated feed base aswell. so does that mean that in a suburban area that as an antenna mine wouldnt be too good its more for distance like your said, on flat terrain?


Nothing is that great in suburban areas, really, with all of the buildings in the way...

3dB would probably by virtue of the wider beamwidth, give you marginally better performance, but in an urban area there are all sorts of factors to consider, such as reflections and multipath fading, diffraction, etc etc which can't be fixed just by changing antenna gain...

Without complex modelling of the buildings and terrain and the routes you drive, etc etc its impossible to say with 100% accuracy which antenna is the best for you.

Do you have the part number for the antenna you have?

_________________
I want my old sig back :(

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:41 am
Posts: 23
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:31 am 
Reply with quote Top  
wow sounds like my perception of radio waves is missing quite a number of factors haha. yeah i have a part number its a GME AE4018 but as the whole set up with the elevated feed base and spring is AE4018K1.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4472
Location: Perth

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:36 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Ok.

The antenna you have is a 477MHz (which is the right frequency) 6.6dBi antenna.

It is ground dependant. So it needs a good ground plane to work effectively. So a bull bar or fender mount is not ideal for this antenna. The roof would be a more effective mounting place.

_________________
I want my old sig back :(

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:41 am
Posts: 23
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:44 am 
Reply with quote Top  
does ground dependant mean that it requires a metal surface mount to receive signal properly. also, what does the elevated feed base do

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4472
Location: Perth

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:51 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Ground dependant means that it needs a ground plane (metal) below it to work effectively.

Interestingly, on further research, the standard antenna is listed as ground dependant, but the one with the elevated feed base is listed as ground independant, so you should be ok...

_________________
I want my old sig back :(

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:41 am
Posts: 23
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:53 am 
Reply with quote Top  
ah ok then. so does it coming in a kit with the elevated base mean that its not required to be on a conductive metal surface? is that the purpose of those bases?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:41 am
Posts: 23
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:06 am 
Reply with quote Top  
so if i possibly change the location to the roof somewhere, performance may be improved or i could just leave it where it is and accept it as thats it and maybe get a low gain antenna too screw onto the base for urban and/or hilly locations. Would that seem like a plausable solution?

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:09 am
Posts: 1009
Location: Melbourne
Vehicle: Suzuki Jimny 2009

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:27 am 
Reply with quote Top  
While the ideal place might be in the middle of the metal roof in reallity if you are only talking to other vehicles within a few km or less then the mounting location is not going to matter much. Sure by mounting on the top you have a good omni-directional signal and by mounting it on the front or back of the car you will make it slightly directional but unless you are trying to work really long distances and squeeze the last bit of performance out of it you won't notice the difference.

One reason for mounting it towards the back of the car by the way is to get it away from the engine electrics although I agree that attached the the spare tyre mount is less than optimal but then again it will work OK.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:41 am
Posts: 23
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:08 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
ok then cool, thanks everyone for your help. i guess ill try some experimenting this weekend. cheers

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14498
Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:16 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
on the shitbox limmo we just had a 30cm 4.5db whip antenna mounted on the roof which was fiberglass
and it worked very well.

_________________
JEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEP

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 385
Location: Kapiti Coast, New Zealand
Vehicle: Samurai G16, DMax.

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:43 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
While you'll get a great signal in and out on with the aerial on the roof the problem over here is we're often driving through virtual tree tunnels and anything that sticks above the body gets scraped off. Aerial mounting then becomes a compromise.

_________________
92 Samurai G16
DMax

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14498
Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny

Post Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 8:52 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Samurai81 wrote:
While you'll get a great signal in and out on with the aerial on the roof the problem over here is we're often driving through virtual tree tunnels and anything that sticks above the body gets scraped off. Aerial mounting then becomes a compromise.



thats why i have a 30cm rubber whip antenna :wink:

_________________
JEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEP

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:41 am
Posts: 23
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:03 am 
Reply with quote Top  
yeah i was thinking too that i may have been sold a too high of a decibel antenna for what i want. seems like 4.5db is pretty good all round and mine is 6.6

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:41 am
Posts: 23
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:27 am 
Reply with quote Top  
would it make any difference to receiver strength moving the antenna from the aluminium bull bar to the suzie at the front of the bonnet?

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 1082
Location: brisbane logan

Post Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:44 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
could you run a splitter and run both 9 and 6 db to get both gains or would they interfer or cancel each other out sort of thing

_________________
josh AKA Bazook

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:09 am
Posts: 1009
Location: Melbourne
Vehicle: Suzuki Jimny 2009

Post Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:19 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
You will have losses associated with the splitter but more importantly the matching will be a problem and there is a good chance of the signals will cancel out unless the phasing is correct. So all round it would not be a good idea to have two antennas. Two antennas can be used to enhance receiver performance when set up correctly but when transmitting there are lots of complications. It is not straightforward.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 1082
Location: brisbane logan

Post Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:22 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
cool no worries :helloo:

_________________
josh AKA Bazook

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:30 pm
Posts: 1540
Location: Blackbutt
Vehicle: LJ80

Post Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 8:56 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
shep wrote:
Samurai81 wrote:
While you'll get a great signal in and out on with the aerial on the roof the problem over here is we're often driving through virtual tree tunnels and anything that sticks above the body gets scraped off. Aerial mounting then becomes a compromise.



thats why i have a 30cm rubber whip antenna :wink:



i had my 6db fibreglass whip stuck in a hole in the roof
an orange tree killed it. i now have a 30cm 3db rubber whip
about 30cm back from the windscreen in a new hole i found :roll:
it works great. minimal interference with my roof racks.
no problem with underground carparks and was cheap.

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ] 

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 842 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours