| Author |
Message |
want33s

az supporter
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 8134 Location: Sunshine Coast Qld
|
 Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 8:22 pm |
|
bigdogdazza wrote: Hmmm I thought the same when running my Jimny to work and back and after buying a pajero on the weekend have found an amazing thing...... Suzuki,s suck for fuel consumption! Absolutely disgusted in how much the tiny 1.3 guzzles! Typically I get 300kms from a full tank= $50 running 95 ethanol elcheapo crap fuel in the Jimny.... Granted yes I have bigger tyres 225x70x15....yes has a rack and spotties fitted so got a bit more drag and yes I know my speedo is out that's why I rely on my gps for accurate reading averaging between 100-115kmph all country and freeway kms. Now The big ass LWB heavy as a tank, 3.5 lt v6 98 model pajero with ALL the bells and whistles inc rack, bullbar, wheels,lift etc etc very un aerodynamic traveling same distance, at same times, same roads, same driver, same fuel from same elcheapo servo used 1/4 of a tank which cost $102 to fill from empty as opposed to the $50 of the Jimny. Now honestly that equates to me that the little Jimny struggling to keep up with freeway/country road traffic is using close to if not double the fuel of an engine nearly triple it's size!!!! WTF???? A bit off topic but.....Did you see that episode of Top Gear (UK) where they had a poxy little Prius going round the track as fast as it possibly could, behind it all the way was a BMW M3 V8. The beemer used less fuel. Economy isn't about using the smallest engine it is about how hard the engine is asked to work. I can't find the episode online but here is a link anyway. http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/24/2445.aspEDIT: Found it.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=badoMjA_rW0
|
|
|
|
 |
bigdogdazza
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:49 pm Posts: 305
Vehicle: Nl pajero Lwb, 98 jimny
|
 Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 2:53 am |
|
|
That's why I still insist there Must be some way I can jam a 6ltr into the Jimny!?? All for the good of the environment and fuel economy of course! I was browsing the web the other day and came across an American site that does a 4ltr alloy v8 kit for the vitara!!! Now if I could get rego with this the Jimbo would get the flick in a heartbeat!
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 9:15 am |
|
bigdogdazza wrote: That's why I still insist there Must be some way I can jam a 6ltr into the Jimny!?? All for the good of the environment and fuel economy of course! I was browsing the web the other day and came across an American site that does a 4ltr alloy v8 kit for the vitara!!! Now if I could get rego with this the Jimbo would get the flick in a heartbeat! Link? I hope its a 1UZFE 
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
want33s

az supporter
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 8134 Location: Sunshine Coast Qld
|
 Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 9:38 am |
|
Fatzook wrote: bigdogdazza wrote: That's why I still insist there Must be some way I can jam a 6ltr into the Jimny!?? All for the good of the environment and fuel economy of course! I was browsing the web the other day and came across an American site that does a 4ltr alloy v8 kit for the vitara!!! Now if I could get rego with this the Jimbo would get the flick in a heartbeat! Link? I hope its a 1UZFE  Would have to be a UZFE wouldn't it. What else is 4.0 alloy V8?
|
|
|
|
 |
sogone

az supporter
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:29 am Posts: 2070 Location: Darwin
|
 Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 9:48 am |
|
|
Landrovers. TVR Chamiras,
|
|
|
|
 |
want33s

az supporter
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 8134 Location: Sunshine Coast Qld
|
 Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 9:57 am |
|
sogone wrote: Landrovers. TVR Chamiras, 3.9 isn't quite 4.0
|
|
|
|
 |
JrZook
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 5517 Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!
|
 Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 10:21 am |
|
want33s wrote: sogone wrote: Landrovers. TVR Chamiras, 3.9 isn't quite 4.0 1UZFE = 3968cc Rover 3.9 = 3946cc Both not quite 4L 
_________________ Lil Foot!
http://tiny.cc/gtsw1
|
|
|
|
 |
Trypt
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:19 am Posts: 492
Vehicle: 1.3 Tin Top
|
 Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 9:23 pm |
|
Sierra isnt quite 1.3 either... 1298 
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 9:31 pm |
|
Trypt wrote: Sierra isnt quite 1.3 either... 1298  Actually NT sierras are 1324cc 
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
fragga
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:55 am Posts: 50 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:30 pm |
|
|
brought the n/t case n 6,5 gears installed. where would i buy brackets to get it to fit in the car?
|
|
|
|
 |
oozuk
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1452 Location: bethania QLD
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:29 pm |
|
Joshua02 wrote: my fuel usage is unbelivable fill up 30 litres and i only get 200 kms ??? is this normal or is this a common problem ??? that's not too far off the mark. one of my old sierra's would only average 200-220kms per tank was running std G13A engine with exhaust and extractors, 31's 2" lift, 4.19 reduction gears and 3.9:1 diff gears. I found that i got the same economy weather i commuted sensibility or flogged the living piss out of it... so guess which one i did every day 
_________________ building a bling zook .......will it ever be finis
|
|
|
|
 |
SeanusMaximus
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:01 am Posts: 45 Location: Mundaring, WA
Vehicle: '93 zook quad carb 31s
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:30 pm |
|
I have a '93 Zook with 4 inch lift and running 31" tyres. I get around 9 kpl if I flog it or nurse it. That's odometre reading so more like 10.7 kpl in reality. That's with a disgustingly oversized Weber carb on it too. Oh and its a stock engine. With 6.5 reduction gears  4.5k rpm at 100 Km/h on the speedo
_________________ Cars are meant to be driven, so DRIVE them!
|
|
|
|
 |
JrZook
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 5517 Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:23 am |
|
SeanusMaximus wrote: I have a '93 Zook with 4 inch lift and running 31" tyres. I get around 9 kpl if I flog it or nurse it. That's odometre reading so more like 10.7 kpl in reality. That's with a disgustingly oversized Weber carb on it too. Oh and its a stock engine. With 6.5 reduction gears  4.5k rpm at 100 Km/h on the speedo How "oversized" ? More flow than quad 36mm moto carbs? I always used to get around 11kpl with my weber on my old hardtop on the highway.
_________________ Lil Foot!
http://tiny.cc/gtsw1
|
|
|
|
 |
SeanusMaximus
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:01 am Posts: 45 Location: Mundaring, WA
Vehicle: '93 zook quad carb 31s
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:31 am |
|
|
38/38 synchronous. The moto carbs have the vacuum slide which regulates the air flow as well as the throttle. So even though they sound big, they don't necessarily flow more. The synchronous weber opens both barrels at the same time dumping copious amounts of fuel in before hoping the engine is going fast enough to produce enough manifold vacuum to suck enough fuel. Simply put it needs careful throttle control to get proper fuel delivery.
_________________ Cars are meant to be driven, so DRIVE them!
|
|
|
|
 |
96coily
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 11:37 am Posts: 1420 Location: Perth Hills
Vehicle: 96 coily Awesome sticker Rust
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:24 pm |
|
|
Should have gone for the 32/36 much better set up and why aren't you wheeling at the moment????????
_________________ I have issues
What are you looking at
|
|
|
|
 |
SeanusMaximus
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:01 am Posts: 45 Location: Mundaring, WA
Vehicle: '93 zook quad carb 31s
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:37 pm |
|
I've been swapping engines over. Bought a nt with a rebuilt engine and quad motorbike carbs so I'm swapping that in. The nt has my old engine in now. Drove to Bunbury and back today with it running the Weber. Got 12 kpl which really surprised me considering the wind. I really need to get out there again. I'm starting to dream about it. 
_________________ Cars are meant to be driven, so DRIVE them!
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:40 pm |
|
|
i ran 32/36... it was a great improvement over a stock carby as far as power was concerned, and economy stayed much the same, but the flooding on angles was just a pain. going EFI was the best thing i ever did... get way more power now and same economy... if i baby it i'll actually get 12km per litre!
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
96coily
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 11:37 am Posts: 1420 Location: Perth Hills
Vehicle: 96 coily Awesome sticker Rust
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:19 pm |
|
|
I thought 12 kpl was normal with the longranger tank I get almost a 1000 k's between refills
_________________ I have issues
What are you looking at
|
|
|
|
 |
grapedrank
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 6:35 am Posts: 42 Location: Brisbane, AU
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 1:52 am |
|
|
Can anyone with a G16B sierra comment on fuel economy? I did a G16B conversion recently, running 30" buckshots and went from 280 km / 27 L (G13BA) to 220 km / 27L from odo readings.. no CEL either so I assume oxy sensor (which is new) and VSS are doing their job.
|
|
|
|
 |
|