It is currently Wed Aug 05, 2026 8:07 am
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 8134
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Post Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 8:22 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
bigdogdazza wrote:
Hmmm I thought the same when running my Jimny to work and back and after buying a pajero on the weekend have found an amazing thing...... Suzuki,s suck for fuel consumption! Absolutely disgusted in how much the tiny 1.3 guzzles!
Typically I get 300kms from a full tank= $50 running 95 ethanol elcheapo crap fuel in the Jimny.... Granted yes I have bigger tyres 225x70x15....yes has a rack and spotties fitted so got a bit more drag and yes I know my speedo is out that's why I rely on my gps for accurate reading averaging between 100-115kmph all country and freeway kms.
Now The big ass LWB heavy as a tank, 3.5 lt v6 98 model pajero with ALL the bells and whistles inc rack, bullbar, wheels,lift etc etc very un aerodynamic traveling same distance, at same times, same roads, same driver, same fuel from same elcheapo servo used 1/4 of a tank which cost $102 to fill from empty as opposed to the $50 of the Jimny. Now honestly that equates to me that the little Jimny struggling to keep up with freeway/country road traffic is using close to if not double the fuel of an engine nearly triple it's size!!!! WTF????


A bit off topic but.....Did you see that episode of Top Gear (UK) where they had a poxy little Prius going round the track as fast as it possibly could, behind it all the way was a BMW M3 V8.
The beemer used less fuel. :D
Economy isn't about using the smallest engine it is about how hard the engine is asked to work.

I can't find the episode online but here is a link anyway.
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/24/2445.asp

EDIT: Found it..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=badoMjA_rW0

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:49 pm
Posts: 305
Vehicle: Nl pajero Lwb, 98 jimny

Post Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 2:53 am 
Reply with quote Top  
That's why I still insist there Must be some way I can jam a 6ltr into the Jimny!?? All for the good of the environment and fuel economy of course!
I was browsing the web the other day and came across an American site that does a 4ltr alloy v8 kit for the vitara!!! Now if I could get rego with this the Jimbo would get the flick in a heartbeat!

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14977
Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV

Post Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 9:15 am 
Reply with quote Top  
bigdogdazza wrote:
That's why I still insist there Must be some way I can jam a 6ltr into the Jimny!?? All for the good of the environment and fuel economy of course!
I was browsing the web the other day and came across an American site that does a 4ltr alloy v8 kit for the vitara!!! Now if I could get rego with this the Jimbo would get the flick in a heartbeat!


Link? I hope its a 1UZFE :twisted:

_________________
2013 GV
1998 SV420 ute

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 8134
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Post Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 9:38 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Fatzook wrote:
bigdogdazza wrote:
That's why I still insist there Must be some way I can jam a 6ltr into the Jimny!?? All for the good of the environment and fuel economy of course!
I was browsing the web the other day and came across an American site that does a 4ltr alloy v8 kit for the vitara!!! Now if I could get rego with this the Jimbo would get the flick in a heartbeat!


Link? I hope its a 1UZFE :twisted:

Would have to be a UZFE wouldn't it. What else is 4.0 alloy V8?

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:29 am
Posts: 2070
Location: Darwin

Post Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 9:48 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Landrovers. TVR Chamiras,

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 8134
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Post Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 9:57 am 
Reply with quote Top  
sogone wrote:
Landrovers. TVR Chamiras,

3.9 isn't quite 4.0

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 5517
Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!

Post Posted: Wed May 23, 2012 10:21 am 
Reply with quote Top  
want33s wrote:
sogone wrote:
Landrovers. TVR Chamiras,

3.9 isn't quite 4.0


1UZFE = 3968cc
Rover 3.9 = 3946cc

Both not quite 4L :wink:

_________________
Lil Foot!
http://tiny.cc/gtsw1

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:19 am
Posts: 492
Vehicle: 1.3 Tin Top

Post Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 9:23 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Sierra isnt quite 1.3 either... 1298 :lol:

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14977
Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV

Post Posted: Thu May 24, 2012 9:31 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Trypt wrote:
Sierra isnt quite 1.3 either... 1298 :lol:



Actually NT sierras are 1324cc :P

_________________
2013 GV
1998 SV420 ute

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:55 am
Posts: 50
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:30 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
brought the n/t case n 6,5 gears installed. where would i buy brackets to get it to fit in the car?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 1452
Location: bethania QLD

Post Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:29 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Joshua02 wrote:
my fuel usage is unbelivable fill up 30 litres and i only get 200 kms ??? is this normal or is this a common problem ???


that's not too far off the mark.

one of my old sierra's would only average 200-220kms per tank

was running std G13A engine with exhaust and extractors, 31's 2" lift, 4.19 reduction gears and 3.9:1 diff gears.

I found that i got the same economy weather i commuted sensibility or flogged the living piss out of it... so guess which one i did every day :mrgreen:

_________________
building a bling zook .......will it ever be finis

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:01 am
Posts: 45
Location: Mundaring, WA
Vehicle: '93 zook quad carb 31s

Post Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:30 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I have a '93 Zook with 4 inch lift and running 31" tyres. I get around 9 kpl if I flog it or nurse it. That's odometre reading so more like 10.7 kpl in reality. That's with a disgustingly oversized Weber carb on it too. Oh and its a stock engine. With 6.5 reduction gears :) 4.5k rpm at 100 Km/h on the speedo

_________________
Cars are meant to be driven, so DRIVE them!

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 5517
Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!

Post Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:23 am 
Reply with quote Top  
SeanusMaximus wrote:
I have a '93 Zook with 4 inch lift and running 31" tyres. I get around 9 kpl if I flog it or nurse it. That's odometre reading so more like 10.7 kpl in reality. That's with a disgustingly oversized Weber carb on it too. Oh and its a stock engine. With 6.5 reduction gears :) 4.5k rpm at 100 Km/h on the speedo


How "oversized" ? More flow than quad 36mm moto carbs? I always used to get around 11kpl with my weber on my old hardtop on the highway.

_________________
Lil Foot!
http://tiny.cc/gtsw1

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:01 am
Posts: 45
Location: Mundaring, WA
Vehicle: '93 zook quad carb 31s

Post Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:31 am 
Reply with quote Top  
38/38 synchronous. The moto carbs have the vacuum slide which regulates the air flow as well as the throttle. So even though they sound big, they don't necessarily flow more. The synchronous weber opens both barrels at the same time dumping copious amounts of fuel in before hoping the engine is going fast enough to produce enough manifold vacuum to suck enough fuel. Simply put it needs careful throttle control to get proper fuel delivery.

_________________
Cars are meant to be driven, so DRIVE them!

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 11:37 am
Posts: 1420
Location: Perth Hills
Vehicle: 96 coily Awesome sticker Rust

Post Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:24 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Should have gone for the 32/36 much better set up and why aren't you wheeling at the moment????????

_________________
I have issues


What are you looking at

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 6:01 am
Posts: 45
Location: Mundaring, WA
Vehicle: '93 zook quad carb 31s

Post Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:37 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I've been swapping engines over. Bought a nt with a rebuilt engine and quad motorbike carbs so I'm swapping that in. The nt has my old engine in now. Drove to Bunbury and back today with it running the Weber. Got 12 kpl which really surprised me considering the wind.

I really need to get out there again. I'm starting to dream about it. :)

_________________
Cars are meant to be driven, so DRIVE them!

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:40 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
i ran 32/36... it was a great improvement over a stock carby as far as power was concerned, and economy stayed much the same, but the flooding on angles was just a pain. going EFI was the best thing i ever did... get way more power now and same economy... if i baby it i'll actually get 12km per litre!

_________________
Image

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 11:37 am
Posts: 1420
Location: Perth Hills
Vehicle: 96 coily Awesome sticker Rust

Post Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:19 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I thought 12 kpl was normal
with the longranger tank I get almost a 1000 k's between refills

_________________
I have issues


What are you looking at

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 6:35 am
Posts: 42
Location: Brisbane, AU

Post Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 1:52 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Can anyone with a G16B sierra comment on fuel economy? I did a G16B conversion recently, running 30" buckshots and went from 280 km / 27 L (G13BA) to 220 km / 27L from odo readings.. no CEL either so I assume oxy sensor (which is new) and VSS are doing their job.

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 303 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours