| Author |
Message |
Stocky
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:50 pm Posts: 85 Location: Goldfields WA
Vehicle: 94 suzuki stockman
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 10:20 am |
|
|
I got the Stockman registered yesterday then upgraded the suspension...thought it was 50mm but it's more like 75mm. I have an issue with the front sway bar where the mounts on the body are to short...I can lengthen the mounts...any suggestions...had the same problem with the rear spring shackles being to short.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
|
|
|
|
 |
MrRocky
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 4731 Location: perth
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 10:25 am |
|
|
I assume you have efs 65mm ? You car looks barely over standard height. I think you might find springs that were in it to start were prob sagged 2". Can take the swaybar off without any real ill effects, but in saying that ut really should fit with a bit of manouvering. The stock shackles should also fit with up to 3.5" spring lift. Perhaps you have front and rear springs mixed up ?
|
|
|
|
 |
Stocky
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:50 pm Posts: 85 Location: Goldfields WA
Vehicle: 94 suzuki stockman
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 10:27 am |
|
|
Yip!!! Actually i meant to put 65mm but it has lifted 75mm
|
|
|
|
 |
Stocky
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:50 pm Posts: 85 Location: Goldfields WA
Vehicle: 94 suzuki stockman
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 10:30 am |
|
|
The rear springs have more leaves to them so IMO fitted right
|
|
|
|
 |
Stocky
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:50 pm Posts: 85 Location: Goldfields WA
Vehicle: 94 suzuki stockman
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 10:38 am |
|
|
This is a pic after the front springs where fitted...I'm happy where the hight but I was going to fit the 50mm body lift but I'm having second thoughts
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
|
|
|
|
 |
MrRocky
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 4731 Location: perth
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 10:56 am |
|
|
No need for body lift I run 32" tyres with no bodylift, you will make the car less capable by fitting a body lift in its present state. Im saying fitting 65mm springs to a car that has sagged 2" will make it seem like alot more lift. Standard shackles will fit on all but the american springs.
|
|
|
|
 |
bumstein

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:49 pm Posts: 1975
Vehicle: Sierras!! SWB and LWB
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 11:03 am |
|
|
ARB can get spacers for the away bar mount.. Or make them, it doesn't take a big spacer to make the away bar fit on properly but when I fitted my lift (albeit not as tall as yours) they settled in time and the away bar fits on nicely without the spacers
|
|
|
|
 |
MrRocky
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 4731 Location: perth
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 11:06 am |
|
|
Very good point once you take it for a spin you will drop some height and moreso after a few trips on corragations and offroad. Just do the hyden track a few times but let you tyres down or youll never walk again.
|
|
|
|
 |
bumstein

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:49 pm Posts: 1975
Vehicle: Sierras!! SWB and LWB
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 5:26 pm |
|
Ah crap!! My post was supposed to say **sway** bars!! Just in case anyone got really confused as to what an away bar is 
|
|
|
|
 |
flymaster
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 8:05 pm Posts: 73
Vehicle: Suzuki Sierra Trayback
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 8:04 pm |
|
This is what I made up for my Maruti ute, 30mm x 2mm RHS. How did the EFS springs go in the back?, according to there website sight there not recomended for traybacks. Regards Nick 
|
|
|
|
 |
Stocky
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:50 pm Posts: 85 Location: Goldfields WA
Vehicle: 94 suzuki stockman
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 9:06 pm |
|
|
Thx Nick...I went down to my w/shop and bought back some heavy wall 30mm tubing thinking along the same lines as your ASB link...as for the EFS rear springs I had to mount the shackle end first otherwise it wouldn't fit even then it's was a wrestle... There is a problem with the front EFS springs as well where there is minimal clearance between it and the spring
|
|
|
|
 |
MrRocky
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 4731 Location: perth
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 9:09 pm |
|
|
The efs 65mm work fine on a trayback they only dont reccomend them because they dont handle being loaded up to well and fail. For this very reason they offer a different h/d spring for lwb's i know of a few warranty claims from suzistore built lwbs that made efs come up with a solution. So in short just dont overload it and should be nice and flexy offroad and last a fair while. Regular driving and offroading see's me replace my springs every 2yrs or so but i flog hell out of them.
|
|
|
|
 |
Stocky
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:50 pm Posts: 85 Location: Goldfields WA
Vehicle: 94 suzuki stockman
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 9:23 pm |
|
|
When I took it out for a spin I was quite pleased with the feel of the suspension
|
|
|
|
 |
Stocky
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:50 pm Posts: 85 Location: Goldfields WA
Vehicle: 94 suzuki stockman
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 9:28 pm |
|
|
Just another project that needs finishing
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
|
|
|
|
 |
MrRocky
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 4731 Location: perth
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 9:45 pm |
|
Stocky wrote: When I took it out for a spin I was quite pleased with the feel of the suspension No swaybar needed  i dont run one cause flex is zero offroad with it in and my springs are stiff enough to eliminate max body roll onroad
|
|
|
|
 |
flymaster
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 8:05 pm Posts: 73
Vehicle: Suzuki Sierra Trayback
|
 Posted: Sat May 10, 2014 10:05 pm |
|
|
Bolt heads are tack welded inside the RHS for ease of removal when replacing swaybar bushes. You'll soon fill those gaurds when you add bigger tyres.
|
|
|
|
 |
|