It is currently Wed Jul 22, 2026 11:30 am
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 65
Location: Sydney

Post Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:26 am 
Reply with quote Top  
My Mate has a charade and its using heaps more than his?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 171
Location: Canberra

Post Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:32 am 
Reply with quote Top  
as far as I can tell its just the mystery of the sierra...........

my 1.3 has worse fuel economy than the v6 patrol

_________________
[img]http://www.auszookers.com/modules/coppermine/

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 127
Location: was Brissy now back

Post Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:58 am 
Reply with quote Top  
v6 patrol??? my 1.3 gets 10L/100km...

_________________
WM MOTORSPORT. Brendale, PH:(07) 3205 1951

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 134
Location: Boyne Island

Post Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:56 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I'd say getting in the region of 11-12 L per 100. I think my zook is running a bit rich though.
Remember though Sosilboy that the zook is revving it's ring-piece out and it's ballistic shape isn't really suited for fuel efficient running. Different gearing, body shape, driving styles etc all combine to make for poor fuel economy.

I think you should compare apples with apples though, a Charade isn't an off-road machine...

Having said all that, I must confess to being disappointed at the economy of the zook. My old '83 Pajero turbo wagon was getting a good if not better milage. Similar ballistic shape, probably at least half again as heavy, but was giving in the region of 28mpg on long hauls - and had 250K+ on the clock.

Still, I loves me zook....

Michael

 Profile  

Offline
omnipotent being
omnipotent being
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 17216
Location: Pluto

Post Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:03 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
my vit now gets 10l/100km with aircon on, 9.2 with it off :)
my old sierra, 1.3 3" suspension, 2" body, 31's and rockhopper used to get 11-12/100km but you had to drive it hard to get anywhere
my 82 1 litre hardtop with same mods but 1 litre and 4speed got bang on 10l/100km regardless of what you did or where you went, you could set your calculator by it :)

driving style has a lot to do with it, back off a notch and take a few minutes longer to get there will see you saving heaps, as will making sure its tuned spot on

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 163
Location: Gordonvale, North Qu

Post Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:49 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I'm getting 450km out of a 40L tank and having the aircon on makes very little difference but I attribute this performance to the Variable Valve Timing (VVT). Handy thing that VVT! :D

_________________
Zooks Rule
2005 Jimny Z Series with VVT

[img]h

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 171
Location: Canberra

Post Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:43 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
im on about 13L per 100Km, but the engine is not in great condition and I work as a delivery driver so it does heaps of stop starting

_________________
[img]http://www.auszookers.com/modules/coppermine/

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 3
Location: Carindale, Brisbane

Post Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:28 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
mine gets 16lt per 100km. but i use my right foor a fair bit. its a 1lt with a 4spd

_________________
Yeah i got your 'Jeep' thing... now it burns when

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 3459
Location: licking some windows
Vehicle: LJ20 LJ50

Post Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:51 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
charade = 6 litres per 100 km
But it is gay

Also see brake thread

_________________
Camels have nice toes

 Profile  

Offline
omnipotent being
omnipotent being
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 17216
Location: Pluto

Post Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:53 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I will just add that on a recent highway run from tenterfield to Brisbane I got 8.9l/100km from the vit :)

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 171
Location: Canberra

Post Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:29 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
*revive* does anyone know what the economy ratings were for zooks when they were new?

_________________
[img]http://www.auszookers.com/modules/coppermine/

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 4003
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:32 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
My daily driver (Lancer VRX) get 630km and takes about 36 to 39Lts to refill. (44lt tank)
Dam good I'd say :-)

_________________
[quote="royce"] I wouldnt mind insulating my rear

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 63

Post Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:29 am 
Reply with quote Top  
My does too. I went and put a bigger fuel filter on mine from an early modle blue bird and replaced all fuel lines, and next step is to check the charcol filters to see if that makes a diff.

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 68 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours