It is currently Tue Jul 28, 2026 7:28 am
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:39 pm
Posts: 120
Location: St Helens

Post Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 1:16 am 
Reply with quote Top  
So my 30/9.5R15 Maxxis Mudders are getting pretty light on for tread, so i'm wondering (after seeing these www.cl-link.com/photo/66_5.jpg ), what would be the pros or more importantly any cons for going a tyre in a 215/85R16? These are equivelent to a 30-31/8.5R16. I know they're pretty skinny, so obvious disadvantage on sand, but my main driving is mud and rutted fire trails. I want my zook to be a bit different, so a departure from the usual 'fattest tyre possible' trend is a definite option. I've found a cooper Light Truck tyre in a At pattern in this size and I know that their tyres are great quality.

_________________
92 Sierra Hardtop, 2" OME Lift, 30" Maxxis Mudders

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 1:49 am 
Reply with quote Top  
its a very good idea... think of a tank when you think of tyres...

40+tons of steel on 2 skinny tracks... its the length of the tread that provides you traction, not the width. When you air down a tyre your aim is to increase its length on the ground giving more tread to grip it.

Now consider - what brands are available in that size and are you happy with those tread patterns?

I engineered mine for 31x10.5r15 as its a common size and very available, it was also the biggest i could go with WA's stupid laws (which are now worse). My next set will most likely be 32x9.5 swampers.

_________________
Image

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 3159
Location: gold coast

Post Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 2:09 am 
Reply with quote Top  
A mate runs a good year wrangler in a skinnier size on his tourer an absolutely swears by them..

He is doing all kinds of terrain and says they are perfect on everything.

215s are farely thin though.. I would look for something a little wider .. Maybe a 225 or wider again as the tread pattern tends to get tight with smaller sizes... So less self cleaning

_________________
http://auszookers.com/index.php?name=Forums&file=v

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2659
Location: hobart tasmania

Post Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 2:57 am 
Reply with quote Top  
a skinny tyre is a good idea tho as it will just cut through the mud and not just hit and sink bering in tassie mud is our main tracks so it would more then likley work better for u

_________________
-indebt 4x4 club-

nav 32s n winch cust rear

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 1084
Location: Ipswich

Post Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 3:35 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I run 32x 9 swampers and they work great and i wanted to do the same go away from the widest tyre possible look.

_________________
TWIN LOCK IT & JUST DRIVE!

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13007
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 7:36 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I'm a big fan of skinny tyres for the reasons outlined above ( but did you know skinny tyres are better on sand that fat tyres?) however, I don't think I'd go with 215's. They're an uncommon size, so you have a limited range of replacements, and also check their load rating- lots of narrow 16's have sky high load ratings that don't conform well on a Sierra.

Personally if you are going to narrow 16's I'd step up another inch to 7.50 16's or 235 85 16- more tyre availability and a bit longer footprint.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm
Posts: 34842
Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's

Post Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 10:34 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Junior_91 wrote:
I run 32x 9 swampers and they work great and i wanted to do the same go away from the widest tyre possible look.


what sort of swamper are you running?

_________________
You're just hating because you don't understand

 Profile WWW  

Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 1286
Vehicle: Suzuki

Post Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 12:31 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Like this Alien?

Image

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 1:16 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
nar more like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5aWAW2h ... re=related

As steve informed me the other day - the TSL Bias is available in 32x9.5!
http://www.intercotire.com/tires.php?id=10&g=1

_________________
Image

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 254
Location: Gold Coast
Vehicle: 91 Sierra

Post Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 2:20 am 
Reply with quote Top  

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4109
Location: Ipswich
Vehicle: LJ80V-II (a proper Stockman)

Post Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 2:45 am 
Reply with quote Top  
alien wrote:
As steve informed me the other day - the TSL Bias is available in 32x9.5!
http://www.intercotire.com/tires.php?id=10&g=1



There is the 32x9.5x15
and the 32x9x16 (This is what Junior_91 has)
So a little skinnier if your happy to go to 16" rims :)

I'm still not 100% sure on TSL's myself, the lack of sidebiters bothers me.... But I have plenty of time to check out some more cars in action with different tyres on them :)

_________________
Clearance Hole Technology :P

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 1286
Vehicle: Suzuki

Post Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 3:09 am 
Reply with quote Top  

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 6:15 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Highway-Star wrote:
I'm still not 100% sure on TSL's myself, the lack of sidebiters bothers me.... But I have plenty of time to check out some more cars in action with different tyres on them :)


I noticed that also - but then look at the simex - they hardly have anything on the sides too. I'd love the LTBs but they dont come in the smaller sizes - they have both siping and side biters!!!

_________________
Image

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13007
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:04 am 
Reply with quote Top  
The lack of "sidebiters" isn't really an issue unless you over-rim them. Stretched out, the sidewalls protrude and I agree it's a problem, but if they're on the right size rim the largest side lug pretty much protrudes past the sidewall so it's doing the work of the sidebiter.

The key issue here is the usefulness of the sidebiters is the width of the tyre. We have a spread of cars running 35's in the club - both Q78 swampers (10.5 wide) and Krawlers in 35 13.5. The '78's match the Krawlers for forward traction, but the massive width of the 13.5's jams into the ruts and makes the sidewall traction work. This much sidewall traction would be pointless on a 9" wide tyre as it's never going to fill the rut out enough to make it work.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 9:59 am 
Reply with quote Top  
but steeeeeeve sidebiters look coooooool!

_________________
Image

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4109
Location: Ipswich
Vehicle: LJ80V-II (a proper Stockman)

Post Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 2:41 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Sort of sorry to the O.P. for bringing sidebiters into the arguement, if its to off topic, please move it.

I realise that sidebiters are only of use in some situations, and in fact I can not make such effective use of them on my LJ, because I cannot drive the vehicle as slow and controlled. However on my Sierra, I can basically drive certain things on the sidewall of the tyre; ie say 2 tyres on their main tread area, and place one tyre so that it only touches ground on its sidewall; then I can still achieve forward motion unlocked. Very situation secific of course, usefull about 3.26% of the time :lol: but still I like to be able to do it.



Back to skinny tyres :P , I am really keen on my next set of tyres for my LJ being 7.00-16 Maxxis Creepy Crawlers :twisted:
Yes they make them: http://www.maxxis.com/AutomobileLight-T ... awler.aspx

_________________
Clearance Hole Technology :P

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 9045
Location: Brisneyland
Vehicle: 2006 Jimny JLX

Post Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 6:10 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I like tall skinny tyres. 225/85R15 that would suit me although would be a little narrow for my pretty rims :-)

_________________
Click WWW below for STICKERS

 Profile WWW  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:39 pm
Posts: 120
Location: St Helens

Post Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 6:40 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Sidebiters are fine and this is a tyre topic, so all considerations welcome. I actually had a set of 33/12.5R15 Mickey T Baja Claws on my last car, a 94 Pathfinder with 3" Automotive Customizers long arm kit and 2" body lift. They have great sidebiters and were used LOTS! The biters would be something I'd look at considering I'm in Tassie and a track here can be dry and rutted one week, then muddy as hell the next. I've been trawling around some tyre distributor sites on line and it seems skinnies are pretty rare to find. Probably will steer away from TSL's and the super aggressives as I use the zook as a 110km round trip daily driver for work, lloking more at a quality AT.

_________________
92 Sierra Hardtop, 2" OME Lift, 30" Maxxis Mudders

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 6:41 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I'll post it again cos i think theyre a great looking tyre - the BFG KM2.

_________________
Image

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:39 pm
Posts: 120
Location: St Helens

Post Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 9:07 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
HighwayStar, those Creepy Crawlers look like hold and could definitely be on the cards if i ever look for a separate set of play tires, mounted on some nice tough steelies, would certainly get any zook that little bit further.

_________________
92 Sierra Hardtop, 2" OME Lift, 30" Maxxis Mudders

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:39 pm
Posts: 120
Location: St Helens

Post Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 9:08 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
HighwayStar, those Creepy Crawlers look like hold and could definitely be on the cards if i ever look for a separate set of play tires, mounted on some nice tough steelies, would certainly get any zook that little bit further.

_________________
92 Sierra Hardtop, 2" OME Lift, 30" Maxxis Mudders

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 7717
Location: Brisbane

Post Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:19 am 
Reply with quote Top  
mmm creepies!!!!

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:39 pm
Posts: 120
Location: St Helens

Post Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:40 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Maybe some of these on 24's instead? http://www.coopertires.com.au/index.php ... tyre_id=9#

_________________
92 Sierra Hardtop, 2" OME Lift, 30" Maxxis Mudders

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 1084
Location: Ipswich

Post Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:45 am 
Reply with quote Top  
atari4x4 wrote:
Junior_91 wrote:
I run 32x 9 swampers and they work great and i wanted to do the same go away from the widest tyre possible look.


what sort of swamper are you running?


32x9R16 TSL Super Swamper mate.

_________________
TWIN LOCK IT & JUST DRIVE!

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2659
Location: hobart tasmania

Post Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:46 am 
Reply with quote Top  
24s???? bugger that





























go 26s :P

_________________
-indebt 4x4 club-

nav 32s n winch cust rear

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm
Posts: 34842
Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's

Post Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:48 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Junior_91 wrote:
atari4x4 wrote:
Junior_91 wrote:
I run 32x 9 swampers and they work great and i wanted to do the same go away from the widest tyre possible look.


what sort of swamper are you running?


32x9R16 TSL Super Swamper mate.


so they would be the SAM-40's...

how do you find them being bias & do they bag alright being under a light weight zook?

how are they wearing?

_________________
You're just hating because you don't understand

 Profile WWW  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:39 pm
Posts: 120
Location: St Helens

Post Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:55 am 
Reply with quote Top  
These will be the ones on the realistic list though in a 215/85R16 with a decent (light) set of alloys. www.coopertires.com.au...yre_04.jpg

_________________
92 Sierra Hardtop, 2" OME Lift, 30" Maxxis Mudders

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2659
Location: hobart tasmania

Post Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:57 am 
Reply with quote Top  
links dead for me mate

_________________
-indebt 4x4 club-

nav 32s n winch cust rear

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 1084
Location: Ipswich

Post Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:16 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
atari4x4 wrote:
Junior_91 wrote:
atari4x4 wrote:
Junior_91 wrote:
I run 32x 9 swampers and they work great and i wanted to do the same go away from the widest tyre possible look.


what sort of swamper are you running?


32x9R16 TSL Super Swamper mate.


so they would be the SAM-40's...

how do you find them being bias & do they bag alright being under a light weight zook?

how are they wearing?


They bag really well seeing as i only run 4psi in them :D

Wearing fine as they are only run offroad and they grip in every situation i have thrown at them, even rock.

_________________
TWIN LOCK IT & JUST DRIVE!

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm
Posts: 34842
Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's

Post Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:19 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Junior_91 wrote:
atari4x4 wrote:
Junior_91 wrote:
atari4x4 wrote:
Junior_91 wrote:
I run 32x 9 swampers and they work great and i wanted to do the same go away from the widest tyre possible look.


what sort of swamper are you running?


32x9R16 TSL Super Swamper mate.


so they would be the SAM-40's...

how do you find them being bias & do they bag alright being under a light weight zook?

how are they wearing?


They bag really well seeing as i only run 4psi in them :D

Wearing fine as they are only run offroad and they grip in every situation i have thrown at them, even rock.


beadlocked???

DAMN IT I SHOULD HAVE GRABED THOSE CHEAP SWAMPERS OFF EBAY

_________________
You're just hating because you don't understand

 Profile WWW  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 582 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours