| Author |
Message |
benchez
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:39 pm Posts: 120 Location: St Helens
|
 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 1:16 am |
|
So my 30/9.5R15 Maxxis Mudders are getting pretty light on for tread, so i'm wondering (after seeing these www.cl-link.com/photo/66_5.jpg ), what would be the pros or more importantly any cons for going a tyre in a 215/85R16? These are equivelent to a 30-31/8.5R16. I know they're pretty skinny, so obvious disadvantage on sand, but my main driving is mud and rutted fire trails. I want my zook to be a bit different, so a departure from the usual 'fattest tyre possible' trend is a definite option. I've found a cooper Light Truck tyre in a At pattern in this size and I know that their tyres are great quality.
_________________ 92 Sierra Hardtop, 2" OME Lift, 30" Maxxis Mudders
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 1:49 am |
|
|
its a very good idea... think of a tank when you think of tyres...
40+tons of steel on 2 skinny tracks... its the length of the tread that provides you traction, not the width. When you air down a tyre your aim is to increase its length on the ground giving more tread to grip it.
Now consider - what brands are available in that size and are you happy with those tread patterns?
I engineered mine for 31x10.5r15 as its a common size and very available, it was also the biggest i could go with WA's stupid laws (which are now worse). My next set will most likely be 32x9.5 swampers.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
89_tintop

az supporter
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 3159 Location: gold coast
|
 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 2:09 am |
|
|
A mate runs a good year wrangler in a skinnier size on his tourer an absolutely swears by them..
He is doing all kinds of terrain and says they are perfect on everything.
215s are farely thin though.. I would look for something a little wider .. Maybe a 225 or wider again as the tread pattern tends to get tight with smaller sizes... So less self cleaning
|
|
|
|
 |
BUZOOKA

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2659 Location: hobart tasmania
|
 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 2:57 am |
|
|
a skinny tyre is a good idea tho as it will just cut through the mud and not just hit and sink bering in tassie mud is our main tracks so it would more then likley work better for u
_________________ -indebt 4x4 club-
nav 32s n winch cust rear
|
|
|
|
 |
Junior_91
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 1084 Location: Ipswich
|
 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 3:35 am |
|
|
I run 32x 9 swampers and they work great and i wanted to do the same go away from the widest tyre possible look.
_________________ TWIN LOCK IT & JUST DRIVE!
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 7:36 am |
|
|
I'm a big fan of skinny tyres for the reasons outlined above ( but did you know skinny tyres are better on sand that fat tyres?) however, I don't think I'd go with 215's. They're an uncommon size, so you have a limited range of replacements, and also check their load rating- lots of narrow 16's have sky high load ratings that don't conform well on a Sierra.
Personally if you are going to narrow 16's I'd step up another inch to 7.50 16's or 235 85 16- more tyre availability and a bit longer footprint.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34842 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 10:34 am |
|
Junior_91 wrote: I run 32x 9 swampers and they work great and i wanted to do the same go away from the widest tyre possible look.
what sort of swamper are you running?
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
foonji
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 1286
Vehicle: Suzuki
|
 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 12:31 pm |
|
Like this Alien?

|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 1:16 pm |
|
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
lauby

az supporter
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 254 Location: Gold Coast
Vehicle: 91 Sierra
|
 Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 2:20 am |
|
|
|
 |
Highway-Star
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4109 Location: Ipswich
Vehicle: LJ80V-II (a proper Stockman)
|
 Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 2:45 am |
|
alien wrote: As steve informed me the other day - the TSL Bias is available in 32x9.5! http://www.intercotire.com/tires.php?id=10&g=1
There is the 32x9.5x15
and the 32x9x16 (This is what Junior_91 has)
So a little skinnier if your happy to go to 16" rims
I'm still not 100% sure on TSL's myself, the lack of sidebiters bothers me.... But I have plenty of time to check out some more cars in action with different tyres on them 
_________________ Clearance Hole Technology 
|
|
|
|
 |
foonji
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 1286
Vehicle: Suzuki
|
 Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 3:09 am |
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 6:15 am |
|
Highway-Star wrote: I'm still not 100% sure on TSL's myself, the lack of sidebiters bothers me.... But I have plenty of time to check out some more cars in action with different tyres on them 
I noticed that also - but then look at the simex - they hardly have anything on the sides too. I'd love the LTBs but they dont come in the smaller sizes - they have both siping and side biters!!!
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:04 am |
|
|
The lack of "sidebiters" isn't really an issue unless you over-rim them. Stretched out, the sidewalls protrude and I agree it's a problem, but if they're on the right size rim the largest side lug pretty much protrudes past the sidewall so it's doing the work of the sidebiter.
The key issue here is the usefulness of the sidebiters is the width of the tyre. We have a spread of cars running 35's in the club - both Q78 swampers (10.5 wide) and Krawlers in 35 13.5. The '78's match the Krawlers for forward traction, but the massive width of the 13.5's jams into the ruts and makes the sidewall traction work. This much sidewall traction would be pointless on a 9" wide tyre as it's never going to fill the rut out enough to make it work.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 9:59 am |
|
|
but steeeeeeve sidebiters look coooooool!
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
Highway-Star
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4109 Location: Ipswich
Vehicle: LJ80V-II (a proper Stockman)
|
 Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 2:41 pm |
|
Sort of sorry to the O.P. for bringing sidebiters into the arguement, if its to off topic, please move it.
I realise that sidebiters are only of use in some situations, and in fact I can not make such effective use of them on my LJ, because I cannot drive the vehicle as slow and controlled. However on my Sierra, I can basically drive certain things on the sidewall of the tyre; ie say 2 tyres on their main tread area, and place one tyre so that it only touches ground on its sidewall; then I can still achieve forward motion unlocked. Very situation secific of course, usefull about 3.26% of the time  but still I like to be able to do it.
Back to skinny tyres  , I am really keen on my next set of tyres for my LJ being 7.00-16 Maxxis Creepy Crawlers
Yes they make them: http://www.maxxis.com/AutomobileLight-T ... awler.aspx
_________________ Clearance Hole Technology 
|
|
|
|
 |
zukenutter

az supporter
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 9045 Location: Brisneyland
Vehicle: 2006 Jimny JLX
|
 Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 6:10 am |
|
I like tall skinny tyres. 225/85R15 that would suit me although would be a little narrow for my pretty rims 
_________________ Click WWW below for STICKERS
|
|
|
|
 |
benchez
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:39 pm Posts: 120 Location: St Helens
|
 Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 6:40 am |
|
|
Sidebiters are fine and this is a tyre topic, so all considerations welcome. I actually had a set of 33/12.5R15 Mickey T Baja Claws on my last car, a 94 Pathfinder with 3" Automotive Customizers long arm kit and 2" body lift. They have great sidebiters and were used LOTS! The biters would be something I'd look at considering I'm in Tassie and a track here can be dry and rutted one week, then muddy as hell the next. I've been trawling around some tyre distributor sites on line and it seems skinnies are pretty rare to find. Probably will steer away from TSL's and the super aggressives as I use the zook as a 110km round trip daily driver for work, lloking more at a quality AT.
_________________ 92 Sierra Hardtop, 2" OME Lift, 30" Maxxis Mudders
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 6:41 am |
|
|
I'll post it again cos i think theyre a great looking tyre - the BFG KM2.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
benchez
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:39 pm Posts: 120 Location: St Helens
|
 Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 9:07 pm |
|
|
HighwayStar, those Creepy Crawlers look like hold and could definitely be on the cards if i ever look for a separate set of play tires, mounted on some nice tough steelies, would certainly get any zook that little bit further.
_________________ 92 Sierra Hardtop, 2" OME Lift, 30" Maxxis Mudders
|
|
|
|
 |
benchez
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:39 pm Posts: 120 Location: St Helens
|
 Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 9:08 pm |
|
|
HighwayStar, those Creepy Crawlers look like hold and could definitely be on the cards if i ever look for a separate set of play tires, mounted on some nice tough steelies, would certainly get any zook that little bit further.
_________________ 92 Sierra Hardtop, 2" OME Lift, 30" Maxxis Mudders
|
|
|
|
 |
tanshi

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 7717 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:19 am |
|
|
|
 |
benchez
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:39 pm Posts: 120 Location: St Helens
|
 Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:40 am |
|
|
_________________ 92 Sierra Hardtop, 2" OME Lift, 30" Maxxis Mudders
|
|
|
|
 |
Junior_91
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 1084 Location: Ipswich
|
 Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:45 am |
|
atari4x4 wrote: Junior_91 wrote: I run 32x 9 swampers and they work great and i wanted to do the same go away from the widest tyre possible look. what sort of swamper are you running?
32x9R16 TSL Super Swamper mate.
_________________ TWIN LOCK IT & JUST DRIVE!
|
|
|
|
 |
BUZOOKA

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2659 Location: hobart tasmania
|
 Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:46 am |
|
24s???? bugger that
go 26s 
_________________ -indebt 4x4 club-
nav 32s n winch cust rear
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34842 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:48 am |
|
Junior_91 wrote: atari4x4 wrote: Junior_91 wrote: I run 32x 9 swampers and they work great and i wanted to do the same go away from the widest tyre possible look. what sort of swamper are you running? 32x9R16 TSL Super Swamper mate.
so they would be the SAM-40's...
how do you find them being bias & do they bag alright being under a light weight zook?
how are they wearing?
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
benchez
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:39 pm Posts: 120 Location: St Helens
|
 Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:55 am |
|
These will be the ones on the realistic list though in a 215/85R16 with a decent (light) set of alloys. www.coopertires.com.au...yre_04.jpg
_________________ 92 Sierra Hardtop, 2" OME Lift, 30" Maxxis Mudders
|
|
|
|
 |
BUZOOKA

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2659 Location: hobart tasmania
|
 Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:57 am |
|
|
links dead for me mate
_________________ -indebt 4x4 club-
nav 32s n winch cust rear
|
|
|
|
 |
Junior_91
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 1084 Location: Ipswich
|
 Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:16 pm |
|
atari4x4 wrote: Junior_91 wrote: atari4x4 wrote: Junior_91 wrote: I run 32x 9 swampers and they work great and i wanted to do the same go away from the widest tyre possible look. what sort of swamper are you running? 32x9R16 TSL Super Swamper mate. so they would be the SAM-40's... how do you find them being bias & do they bag alright being under a light weight zook? how are they wearing?
They bag really well seeing as i only run 4psi in them
Wearing fine as they are only run offroad and they grip in every situation i have thrown at them, even rock.
_________________ TWIN LOCK IT & JUST DRIVE!
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34842 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:19 pm |
|
Junior_91 wrote: atari4x4 wrote: Junior_91 wrote: atari4x4 wrote: Junior_91 wrote: I run 32x 9 swampers and they work great and i wanted to do the same go away from the widest tyre possible look. what sort of swamper are you running? 32x9R16 TSL Super Swamper mate. so they would be the SAM-40's... how do you find them being bias & do they bag alright being under a light weight zook? how are they wearing? They bag really well seeing as i only run 4psi in them  Wearing fine as they are only run offroad and they grip in every situation i have thrown at them, even rock.
beadlocked???
DAMN IT I SHOULD HAVE GRABED THOSE CHEAP SWAMPERS OFF EBAY
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
|