| Author |
Message |
maloo11
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:17 am Posts: 232 Location: NSW
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:47 am |
|
|
Are g16a motors any good for sierra upgrade, or do you need the g16b EFI? g16a have only 6kw more power than standard the 1.3 motor
_________________ 91Sierra; 2in lift; 2inBL; 6.5s; 31muds;
|
|
|
|
 |
xedent

az supporter
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 895 Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
Vehicle: LWB Maruthi on WT Diffs!
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:58 am |
|
then go the EFI 
_________________ My Maruti build, Click WWW
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:58 am |
|
|
i've had both... the difference between g13a and g16a in power is the same as the difference between g16a and g16b... its not on paper, but it feels that way.
g16a is just fine as a conversion and is cheaper by far... and you can always change to g16b down the track as the bottom end is the same except for pistons (so if you go g16a put a set of g16b pistons in when you rebuild it).
personally g16b is far superior though, and i'd recommend saving up and doing it outright.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 10:00 am |
|
|
oh and look at the torque figures, as thats where the 1.6 EFI shines.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
jdk81
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2372 Location: Ballarat, VIC
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 10:04 am |
|
|
You can pick up a baleno g16b long motor cheaply.
Whack the 1.3 head and manifolds on and slight changes. A cheap mod for good power (about $300 for adapter plate and a few bits and pieces).
Keep an eye out for a high km vitara 1.6 efi and yoink the head, intake manifold, ecu and loom etc. Reco the head, then fit it later.
Then just get a g16b head gasket, fuel pump, extractors to suit when ready.
Probably the easiest way to convert a DD to 1.6 efi, and it wont cost too much.
Spending $100 more to it this way, and if you decide you cbf doing the efi after adding the 1.6, you just saved yourself some coin and a lot of work.
|
|
|
|
 |
Reubs
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1522 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: SJ80, SE416
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 1:11 am |
|
maloo11 wrote: g16a have only 6kw more power than standard the 1.3 motor
I thought the figure was about 12.5kW, but there is a big torque difference between the G16 and G13. That is where the difference lies.
|
|
|
|
 |
maloo11
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:17 am Posts: 232 Location: NSW
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 1:25 am |
|
|
On redbook the figures read 49kw for 1.3 and 55kw for 1.6. Does anyone know if this is correct
_________________ 91Sierra; 2in lift; 2inBL; 6.5s; 31muds;
|
|
|
|
 |
BlueSuzy

az supporter
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 9716 Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 1:45 am |
|
|
sounds about right for a carb 1.6
_________________ BlueSuzy wrote: I'm over the G16b's.
|
|
|
|
 |
SuziBlu
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4268 Location: Eyre Peninsula
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 1:50 am |
|
maloo11 wrote: On redbook the figures read 49kw for 1.3 and 55kw for 1.6. Does anyone know if this is correct
When I was looking into donks, I found 48kw and 100nm for the 1.3l, 60kw and 123nm for the carb 1.6l and 71kw with 133nm for tyhe 1.6l EFI
Seems to be a lot of varying values.
_________________ Bad decisions make good stories.
|
|
|
|
 |
jdk81
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2372 Location: Ballarat, VIC
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 2:47 am |
|
Reubs wrote: maloo11 wrote: g16a have only 6kw more power than standard the 1.3 motor I thought the figure was about 12.5kW, but there is a big torque difference between the G16 and G13. That is where the difference lies.
That is correct, because the G16 has a longer stroke, it generates more torque but can not rev as high.
The difference in power and torque between the 16A and 16B (1.6 efi), isn't exactly from the efi, its from the higher compression ratio.
|
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14498 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 2:58 am |
|
jdk81 wrote: Reubs wrote: maloo11 wrote: g16a have only 6kw more power than standard the 1.3 motor I thought the figure was about 12.5kW, but there is a big torque difference between the G16 and G13. That is where the difference lies. That is correct, because the G16 has a longer stroke, it generates more torque but can not rev as high. The difference in power and torque between the 16A and 16B (1.6 efi), isn't exactly from the efi, its from the higher compression ratio.
my g16 carb motor revved past 6k no problems 
_________________ JEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEP
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 6:06 am |
|
|
revved - past tense =)
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
bigrig91
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1308 Location: Redcliffe
Vehicle: 96 LWB Vit, 2.5L powerhouse
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 6:13 am |
|
|
Mine revvvs past 6 grand. not very often though!
_________________ 1997 Sierra, daily driver, 60mm coils, 2 inch body
|
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14498 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 6:17 am |
|
alien wrote: revved - past tense =)
it still would no worries however a few other bits are missing.

_________________ JEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEP
|
|
|
|
 |
SuziBlu
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4268 Location: Eyre Peninsula
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 8:03 am |
|
|
You do not need the insane revs of the 1.3 to do the same, and better, with a 1.6l.
But, a 1.6l does rev very well.
_________________ Bad decisions make good stories.
|
|
|
|
 |
whincup

az supporter
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 1588 Location: Gracemere, QLD
Vehicle: '94 suzuki maruti
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:03 am |
|
i had my 1.3 over 7 once... didnt sound pretty, especially with the hole in the exhaust. but i rekon it ran heaps better afterwards 
|
|
|
|
 |
SuziBlu
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4268 Location: Eyre Peninsula
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:43 am |
|
|
lol yep, bin there, dun that, an, yes, most definitely better.
_________________ Bad decisions make good stories.
|
|
|
|
 |
|