| Author |
Message |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 11:07 am |
|
|
does any one know of the possibility to buy a new jimny crownwheel and pinion? mine is getting a bit on the noisey side of life! Phil
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 12:07 pm |
|
|
Genuine would be my guess. $$$$$$
Perhaps you should just pick up a used one.
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
kenn
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 1202 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 12:14 pm |
|
|
Maruti rear. Front? bad luck.
|
|
|
|
 |
Brenno
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 997 Location: Hobart
|
 Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 12:23 pm |
|
|
Are you sure its not just the bearings getting noisy? Have you pulled it out and taken a look at the teeth surfaces?
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 1:14 pm |
|
Brenno wrote: Are you sure its not just the bearings getting noisy? Have you pulled it out and taken a look at the teeth surfaces? Just pulled it and TBH the teath look good! i have ordered a master rebuild kit, so hopefully i have it back on the road buy the weekend or early next week!
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
whincup

az supporter
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 1588 Location: Gracemere, QLD
Vehicle: '94 suzuki maruti
|
 Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 2:45 pm |
|
kenn wrote: Maruti rear. Front? bad luck. ones 4.09 and ones 4.11 IIRC, i think i remembered reading an argument on here about it... i don't remember which way around
|
|
|
|
 |
mnemonix

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1409 Location: Newcastle NSW
Vehicle: '96 LWB trayback
|
 Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 4:08 pm |
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 4:12 pm |
|
mnemonix wrote: Both are 4.09. haven't got one infront of me, but I worked my Maruti out to 4.11. Regardless, I doubt .02 would make any difference.
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
Last edited by Fatzook on Thu May 02, 2013 4:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
 |
sideways

az supporter
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:53 pm Posts: 5936 Location: Northcliffe, W.A.
Vehicle: LJs, Sierra, Jimny, Swift.
|
 Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 4:17 pm |
|
|
|
 |
SierraDan

az supporter
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:55 pm Posts: 9348 Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: G13BB Jimny
|
 Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 4:19 pm |
|
|
Jimny is 4.09 too? or Jimny is 4.11?
_________________ mlm
|
|
|
|
 |
mnemonix

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1409 Location: Newcastle NSW
Vehicle: '96 LWB trayback
|
 Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 4:33 pm |
|
|
My maruti front and rear were both 45/11. Ie. 4.09. Have since used jimny rears on 2 occasions, they were both the same ratio.
I must be the luckiest Bastard alive then?
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34842 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 4:52 pm |
|
SierraDan wrote: Jimny is 4.09 too? or Jimny is 4.11? 4.09:1... i'd beleive the words that come out of this man's mouth. joeblow wrote: Benz2369 wrote: i know the diff ratio on a auto Jimny is different to a manual one yet to see an auto one that has a different ratio than a manual. i've contacted suzuki about different ratios for that model and they do not exist. they are all 4.09:1.
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
whincup

az supporter
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 1588 Location: Gracemere, QLD
Vehicle: '94 suzuki maruti
|
 Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 3:32 pm |
|
|
in all honesty i wouldnt know since i've never bothered counting either, I just remember reading an argument of someone claiming one was different to the other
|
|
|
|
 |
BlueSuzy

az supporter
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 9716 Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB
|
 Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 5:00 pm |
|
|
4.09 or 4.3 avaliable.
_________________ BlueSuzy wrote: I'm over the G16b's.
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 8:24 pm |
|
|
|
 |
kenn
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 1202 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 7:59 am |
|
Fatzook wrote: mnemonix wrote: Both are 4.09. haven't got one infront of me, but I worked my Maruti out to 4.11. Regardless, I doubt .02 would make any difference. Bingo. It didn't bother mine at all. The difference is equivalent to airing the front tyres down less then the rear.
|
|
|
|
 |
jdk81
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2372 Location: Ballarat, VIC
|
 Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 8:58 am |
|
kenn wrote: Fatzook wrote: mnemonix wrote: Both are 4.09. Regardless, I doubt .02 would make any difference. Bingo. It didn't bother mine at all. The difference is equivalent to airing the front tyres down less then the rear. approx 0.49% different between 4.11 to 4.09 so 31" tyre *25.4mm*0.49% = 3.85mm diff in diam. Heaps of 4x4s have way more wear difference front to back than this. F-all difference.
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 11:36 am |
|
|
|
 |
zooky08

az supporter
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 3426 Location: imbil/gympie. qld
Vehicle: 03 Jimny
|
 Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 3:31 pm |
|
|
Ive got maruti diffs fitted to a wt diff housing. But there is nt and wt maruti's
_________________ 03 Jimny 30 km2s 75mm lift f&r locked winch
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 3:46 pm |
|
jonno_racing wrote: are matuti diffs 1300 or 1ltr size? both. WT's are 1300 size, NT's are 1L size.
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 6:39 pm |
|
|
Thanks guys! the hunt continues! my diff is ok for the moment. still nosey! but not so much! want to try to get a GOOD c/p and build with a air locker.
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
whincup

az supporter
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 1588 Location: Gracemere, QLD
Vehicle: '94 suzuki maruti
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:49 pm |
|
|
digging up an old thread: so what was the consensus on maruti vs jimny ratio's? would a jimny crownwheel and pinion be suitable for a swap into a WT maruti rear to replace frucked C&P without having to change the front?
|
|
|
|
 |
mnemonix

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1409 Location: Newcastle NSW
Vehicle: '96 LWB trayback
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:37 pm |
|
|
Yes, its how I run mine. Jimny rear is identical to maruti and can be put in front or rear.
|
|
|
|
 |
whincup

az supporter
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 1588 Location: Gracemere, QLD
Vehicle: '94 suzuki maruti
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:46 pm |
|
mnemonix wrote: Yes, its how I run mine. Jimny rear is identical to maruti and can be put in front or rear. the whole centre or just the C&P? and is it only the early G13bb jimny's or is it all? cheers for the help
|
|
|
|
 |
mnemonix

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1409 Location: Newcastle NSW
Vehicle: '96 LWB trayback
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:23 pm |
|
|
Whole centre. I haven't personally pulled a centre from anything newer than around '05 so can't comment on new models. All the old ones I have seen were OK to use.
|
|
|
|
 |
|