It is currently Tue Jul 28, 2026 8:53 pm
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 1441
Location: Clarkson W.A.

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:02 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Hi!

I was just wondering if anyone on here has two sets of wheels - one for the road and one for wheeling?

235 muddies for offroading and keeping my 215s with all-terrains for the road.

215's for sand and basic touring, but 235's for the tougher tracks!

Thoughts?

_________________
09 Jimny Sierra Limited Edition

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2372
Location: Ballarat, VIC

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:04 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I run 2 sets on my sierra 32" pedes, and 26" bridgestone AT.

My Bridgestone AT will wear out soon, and will be most likely be replacing with a set of 31x10.5 BFG AT.
The AT will be for on road, touring and summer trips.

Its a bit of a PITA but, cheaper in the long run as I use mine as a DD

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2659
Location: hobart tasmania

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:06 am 
Reply with quote Top  
the main reason most people do that is because the mud tyres they have r poor quality on road but after a while u will just get lazy of swaping tyres over all the time for trips and stuff u will just leave them on

+ ur speedo is gonna be out so u have to rememeber 2 different ratios with ur speedo (mainly if tyres r major difference in sized u should be fine)

but its really up to u and if u can be bothered changin tyres before big weekends

_________________
-indebt 4x4 club-

nav 32s n winch cust rear

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 300
Location: Brisbane southside

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:50 am 
Reply with quote Top  
So it comes down to what are the best mud tyres to run on the tar. Run one set and that is that. It still means a compromise slightly less grip in the mud and a little more noise on the tar. What u reckon?

_________________
98 GV

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2659
Location: hobart tasmania

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:53 am 
Reply with quote Top  
we drive zooks noise is all part of it run the muddies all year round :P

_________________
-indebt 4x4 club-

nav 32s n winch cust rear

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 4454
Location: Botany, NSW
Vehicle: MY2019 Jimny

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:41 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I have been running baja claws for over two years, as a DD with no noticable wear.

Heavier trucks, maybe but with a zook, there is no need for play shoes IMO.

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2372
Location: Ballarat, VIC

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:09 am 
Reply with quote Top  
My pedes have only a few thousand kms on them, but you can see the wear.
Plus they handle like crap, and are terrible on wet tarmac.

Im doing a small trip in the zook next year and dont want to burn through my pedes (which is why I am getting the AT)

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4109
Location: Ipswich
Vehicle: LJ80V-II (a proper Stockman)

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:38 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Yeah I sort of run 2 sets of tyres. Problem being now I have two running zooks, I have to swap the 2 sets of tyres between the 2 cars, depending which car is doing what...

It seemed like a good idea at the time, But I am over changing tyres, been doing it just over 2 years now, and it sucks!

My future plan is just for less aggresive tyres on all my cars, so I can just get in it and do whatever the hell I like with it. My current road tyres are 31" Firestone Destination M/T's, and I might just end up putting a set of them on some steelies. Silverstone Extremes are just too crap on road, and too expensive these days for me to bother with another set. As for wear, less then 10,000k on them, and about half tread, they are much softer rubber compound then most things out there.....

_________________
Clearance Hole Technology :P

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:34 am 
Reply with quote Top  
jdk81 wrote:
My pedes have only a few thousand kms on them, but you can see the wear.
Plus they handle like crap, and are terrible on wet tarmac.

Im doing a small trip in the zook next year and dont want to burn through my pedes (which is why I am getting the AT)


interesting you say that - my pedes are brilliant on wet roads - far more grip than the cooper stts i had on before that, and the coopers had more grip than the cooper HTs i had before them!!!

my pedes have worn alot in a year of use - prolly about 15,000km. I had some really bad wear when i first put them on and they've settled now though.

_________________
Image

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13007
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 7:45 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Vermin, I don't think that swapping tyres is a bad idea, but I think you ned to specialise more between the two sets. Specialisation of task for each set is more important than the very small change in size you are contemplating.

I used to run two different sets of tyres on my Hilux many years ago. I ran 235 85 16 BFG AT's on road and 9 32 16 swampers offroad. Both tyres were the same size (the largest size I could easily run on the car) but each was relatively specialised for its task.

I don't think there's any point swapping between two sets radial tyres with decent road behaviour. (which seems to be what your angling towards) In your position, I'd be looking at something like an aggressive AT pattern in 235 on road and a narrow agressive cross ply tyre like a 7.00X16 for off road work.

I actually swap between two sets of swampers on my car depending on what I am doing. For dryer technical trips I run Q78 15 swampers and for wet trips I run 9/34 16 swampers. In wet weather high ground pressure is more important than overall footprint so the 9/34's work better.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 786
Location: perth

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:08 am 
Reply with quote Top  
i def couldnt be bothered swapping wheels each time. but then again i work on cars allday :cry:
i think you should jus get 235 muddies and sell me your 215s :lol:
i sort of regret selling mine to dm90 :oops:

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 9716
Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB

Post Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:18 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I have 3 sets of stockers at home. ..

I'd rather drive on 33' muddies.

Yes ilegal, but on mine, stockers in wind used to blow me over lanes on a freeway...Scarry stuff fighting wind all the time.

Also stockers would have no chance with a 1.6efi and rear mig locked. :twisted: Its nutso in wet too. Feels like 400hp at the wheels. blip of throttle round a corner...whoa suzy! :lol: (also does it with 33's, but less.)

_________________
BlueSuzy wrote:
I'm over the G16b's.

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Beery, Google Adsense [Bot] and 965 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours