It is currently Wed Jul 29, 2026 11:14 am
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Author Message

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 36
Location: Canberra

Post Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:41 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Been thinking about an Ignition Coil Upgrade for my 90 Vitara. Has any of you guys upgraded your coil?

I've been looking at the Pertronix Flame-Thrower and wondering if it will make any difference.

I understand that the standard coil may only out put around 20,000 volts and this coil will do anything up to 40,000 volts.

Image

http://www.pertronix.com/prod/ig/flame/ ... _volt.aspx

 Profile  

Offline
Tubby Elfsdong
Tubby Elfsdong
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 6501
Location: Northside, Brisbane
Vehicle: Coily Sierra

Post Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:09 am 
Reply with quote Top  
What is the cost? Who supplies them?

_________________
Shep is a closet jimny lover!!!!

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 5517
Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!

Post Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:10 am 
Reply with quote Top  
xaravitara wrote:

I've been looking at the Pertronix Flame-Thrower and wondering if it will make any difference.



May I ask a serious question of what do you think it will do? Is the engine miss-firing? Does it already have good spark? Unless your ignition system is already on its wayy out I would not expect any significant gains from just a 'high voltage coil'

My 2 c Dan

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 8164
Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki

Post Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:13 am 
Reply with quote Top  
it will make little to NO diffrance..

more on the NO diffrance side.

_________________
Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet
Sierra build, Jimny build
https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1

 Profile WWW  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 36
Location: Canberra

Post Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 2:32 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
They cost about $80 from a place in Melbourne, usually sold in the US though.

I've read a number of forums where people are claiming that the hotter spark allows for a larger gap on the plug. Thus increasing a better burn and supposidly better fuel efficiency etc etc etc.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 1645
Location: Ipswich

Post Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:06 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
For what you gain is it really worth the hassle and the money?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4268
Location: Eyre Peninsula

Post Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:00 pm 
Reply with quote Top  

_________________
Bad decisions make good stories.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 4:27 pm
Posts: 935
Location: Paraguay
Vehicle: WT Tinny, NT lwb, 1L lwb

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:50 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Just the weight saving alone from your wallet should cut down on fuel consumption......

_________________
JrZook - Mine only hangs 2.5".

 Profile WWW ICQ YIM  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4268
Location: Eyre Peninsula

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:56 am 
Reply with quote Top  
cost is sweet bugger all compared to the rest of the cost of upgrades such as lift kit, body lift, tropical radiator, battery, big wheel, big tyres etc, the coil n such is very small.

_________________
Bad decisions make good stories.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 4:27 pm
Posts: 935
Location: Paraguay
Vehicle: WT Tinny, NT lwb, 1L lwb

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:58 am 
Reply with quote Top  
The cost of pink fluffy dice is small compared to those mods.... doesn't mean you should get em

_________________
JrZook - Mine only hangs 2.5".

 Profile WWW ICQ YIM  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4268
Location: Eyre Peninsula

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:01 am 
Reply with quote Top  
ok, so dont, i dont give a fuk, all I gave was an opinion, and my opinion is, its well worth the cost.

_________________
Bad decisions make good stories.

 Profile  

Offline
omnipotent being
omnipotent being
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 17216
Location: Pluto

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:03 am 
Reply with quote Top  
the big gap is what develops the higher voltage spark, open your plugs up now and see how much difference it doesnt make, if you dont have a miss a fancy coil will do nothing

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4268
Location: Eyre Peninsula

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:08 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Royce, I agree to a point.

What starts a fire better, a oxy/cetalene torch, or a match.

The hotter the coil, the bigger the gap can be, and so, the quicker the ignition of fuel, or more complete the combustion. Either way, better performance.

_________________
Bad decisions make good stories.

 Profile  

Offline
omnipotent being
omnipotent being
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 17216
Location: Pluto

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:07 am 
Reply with quote Top  
yes the bigger the gap CAN be, but the correct question here is what improvement will you see with a bigger gap, will it make any difference at all given we are still igniting at the same point with the same amount of propgation and so on

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4268
Location: Eyre Peninsula

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:17 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I believe so Royce, as the bigger gap means a bigger spark (length), and so, fater ignition, and, a longer burn period so that more is burnt, less waste and, more broom.

I know this is a badish comparison, but during the war, many planes had magnito ignition with 2 plugs, when run up for take off, they would run to full power, then shut down 1 plug, expect 15% loss of revs, then back onto 2 plugs, shut the other down, 15% loss of revs. IF either did not result in 15% loss of power the plane was not allowed to take off, as there was incomplete of ignition.

So if you have a spark that is 50% longer and hotter, even blind freddy could see that ignition must be more better power or less fuel used, depending on what you are doin.

_________________
Bad decisions make good stories.

 Profile  

Offline
omnipotent being
omnipotent being
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 17216
Location: Pluto

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:25 am 
Reply with quote Top  
2 plugs = 2 points of ignition, what gets fire started easier, 2 firelighters stacked on top of each other or 1 on either side of the pile?

longer dwell may have a better effect with a more saturated coil, MSD likely will due to it firing numerous times so more fresh flame fronts.

no doubt there are gains to be had with more spark applied but a simply larger gap will have little effect I think

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4268
Location: Eyre Peninsula

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:40 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Even tho, in the firt instance, a 0.8mm gap may ignite say, x amount of fuel, the rest is burn, where as a 1.2mm gap, must ignite 50% more fuel, and the rest is burn.

More ignition, more start.

I understand that we are not talking huge gains here, as 50% more of fukall is not very much, but, as I said earlier, the little 1.3l needs all the help she can get, is why I went to redline oils thru-out as they are the finest oil, so, less drag.

I love MSD, and believe that when I put it on, and went for a drive, the power difference was very easily felt, more pick up, hung on a lot longer (more torque) before needing a down-change. Better fuel milage when not in play mode as well.

My new build will have a full MSD set up, not just the ignition module.

I believe in trying o get max out of an engine, there is no such ting as enuf.

_________________
Bad decisions make good stories.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 5517
Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:02 am 
Reply with quote Top  

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4268
Location: Eyre Peninsula

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:10 am 
Reply with quote Top  
98 is the octane for a 1.3l in my opinion, that was why I put that there, not as in, IF you use 98, but rather, 98 is a must.

Royce is not saying you need extra voltage to arc a bigger gap, Im saying that the greater the voltage the bigger the gap can be, Royce says more voltage is not required.

As for the primary fly back, the ignition module will handle a 1.2mm gap.

_________________
Bad decisions make good stories.

 Profile  

Offline
omnipotent being
omnipotent being
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 17216
Location: Pluto

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:17 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Pigs ass I am not saying more voltage is needed, its Grade 8 science to know that the further through a gas electricity needs to travel the higher voltage is needed

I am saying its the bigger gap that creates the higher voltage, not the fancy coil so go up your gap on your pluga now and if they dont missfire due to the coil not being able to muster enough sparks to jump the plug then a fancy coil will be of no use to you

Its like saying a bigger fuel line will make your car go faster, with no other mods

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4268
Location: Eyre Peninsula

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:21 am 
Reply with quote Top  
lol ok, now I understand what your saying, I didn't read it like that and was confused, thought you were saying, no more power required, an I was like, er ??

Sorry.

_________________
Bad decisions make good stories.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 36
Location: Canberra

Post Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:19 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Well I've been calling around today and found that my current coil, as long as it is running fine, will do the job nicely. If I was having coil problems then the upgrade may be the way to go.

Saying that, an upgrade may stuff up my dizzy and ignition system due to the higher voltage. I believe that a coil upgrade has worked wonders for some and caused nightmares for others. After all, the vehicle may not even reach the desired 40,000 volts advertised.

I've read people have upgraded their coils and increased the gap size on the plugs, and I can't see why simply opening the gap to 1.2 wouldn't give better performance with a stock coil. I'm going to take the "if it ain't broke" approach on the coil and see what happens after the tune.

Thanks for your opinions guys, much apprieciated!

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13007
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:49 am 
Reply with quote Top  
It's my understanding that the factory ignition system on the sierra is no great thing and it's inadvisable to increase coil voltage. Bosch, for instance, don't recommend a high output coil upgrade for the sierra, and that's the reason why.

Whilst it's fair to say that all cars are built to a price, ignition power will generally very well matched to the requirements of the motor, because it's a win-win for a manufacturer - optimium spark performance for the engine equals more performance and economy and lower emissions. Of course, radically changing conditions in the engine will place a different requirement on the ignition system, but that's generally when boost is applied.

How good are your plug wires xaravitara? Plug wires degrade with age. If you still have stock wires, you'd be surprised how the car runs better with new wires.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 4109
Location: Ipswich
Vehicle: LJ80V-II (a proper Stockman)

Post Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:01 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I made some post on outerlimits a year or so ago where I used a scientific relation to show that in spark ignition engines any more than the required spark is pointless. I would search for it and post the link, but it appears someone over there does not like me, and I can no longer view anything :roll:

_________________
Clearance Hole Technology :P

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 567 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours