auszookers.com • View topic - 3.8 como engine into a wt

Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk

3.8 como engine into a wt

Page 1 of 1

[ 29 posts ]

Print view

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

jacca

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 54
Location: victoria

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:37 am

was looking at a v63800 GM engine at school today and relised how small it was and said i can have it for 50 bucks i cant imagine it working to well but can it be done??

steak_knife

az supporter

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 21335
Location: Smart Ass Island

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:49 am

jacca wrote:

was looking at a v63800 GM engine at school today and relised how small it was and said i can have it for 50 bucks i cant imagine it working to well but can it be done??

2 word's..... DON'T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

_________________
I used to be indecisive,
now I'm not so sure.....

esky

Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 115
Location: Melbourne

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:54 am

This is now the bad idea thread

Bruce

az supporter

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 4003
Location: Brisbane

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:54 am

steknig wrote:

jacca wrote:

was looking at a v63800 GM engine at school today and relised how small it was and said i can have it for 50 bucks i cant imagine it working to well but can it be done??

2 word's..... DON'T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Don't" is one word :roll:

_________________
[quote="royce"] I wouldnt mind insulating my rear

jacca

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 54
Location: victoria

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:57 am

you could pull monos

TUFY

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:30 pm
Posts: 66
Location: Melbourne

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:58 am

It's actually an abbreviation of two words so he's sorta right, lol

redzook91

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 11:30 pm
Posts: 509
Location: Brisbane

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:59 am

jacca wrote:

you could pull monos

That'd be heaps hectic custom

_________________
The LWB From 1993. Poetry in motion

Bruce

az supporter

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 4003
Location: Brisbane

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:04 am

TUFY wrote:

It's actually an abbreviation of two words so he's sorta right, lol

Don't get all techo with me fella :wink:

I have a chance to shit stir him so I'm goin in hard :wink:

_________________
[quote="royce"] I wouldnt mind insulating my rear

Fatzook

az supporter

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14977
Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:05 am

jacca wrote:

you could pull monos

Wrong.

the motor is WAY too heavy for that.

The crummydore V6 has the similar power and torque figures as a 4AGZE.

V6 - 127kw, 288Nm
4AGZE - 125kw, 210Nm

The reason I make this comparison is because the 4AGZE weighs about 50kgs less and is half the size!!

Don't do it.

_________________
2013 GV
1998 SV420 ute

Last edited by Fatzook on Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

31zook

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 9242
Location: maito
Vehicle: <3 Edna <3

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:07 am

im just waiting for this thread to be locked... :lol:

redzook91

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 11:30 pm
Posts: 509
Location: Brisbane

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:13 am

Fatzook wrote:

jacca wrote:

you could pull monos

Wrong.

are they the figures! That's abysmal when you've got 3.8 litres to work with! I guess it is old tech though... The 3800 must be pre-ecotech, right? I was sure they weren't that weak.

_________________
The LWB From 1993. Poetry in motion

TUFY

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:30 pm
Posts: 66
Location: Melbourne

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:15 am

The charged version surely would go much better, I know my old mans commy goes hard.

Fatzook

az supporter

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14977
Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:16 am

redzook91 wrote:

Fatzook wrote:

jacca wrote:

you could pull monos

Wrong.

are they the figures! That's abysmal when you've got 3.8 litres to work with! I guess it is old tech though... The 3800 must be pre-ecotech, right? I was sure they weren't that weak.

Ecotechs are slightly better, but not by enough to justify the conversion.

_________________
2013 GV
1998 SV420 ute

Fatzook

az supporter

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14977
Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:17 am

TUFY wrote:

The charged version surely would go much better, I know my old mans commy goes hard.

Still way too heavy for a zook. I know because I've done the conversion. Great rockcrawler. useless for EVERYTHING else. except Mud drags

No chance of driving it on the road either. :roll:

_________________
2013 GV
1998 SV420 ute

Joe

I live here!

Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 49041
Location: Rockingham W.A
Vehicle: JB74

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:10 am

Fatzook wrote:

TUFY wrote:

The charged version surely would go much better, I know my old mans commy goes hard.

Still way too heavy for a zook. I know because I've done the conversion. Great rockcrawler. useless for EVERYTHING else. except Mud drags

No chance of driving it on the road either. :roll:

What happened to the one you built

_________________
Joe likes boobs ( . )( . ) ( ° )( ° )

TUFY

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:30 pm
Posts: 66
Location: Melbourne

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:14 am

Would still be fun though. Shoulda kept my old F6 motor lol. That would of been an interestin ride.

Fatzook

az supporter

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14977
Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:26 am

joseph wrote:

Fatzook wrote:

TUFY wrote:

The charged version surely would go much better, I know my old mans commy goes hard.

Still way too heavy for a zook. I know because I've done the conversion. Great rockcrawler. useless for EVERYTHING else. except Mud drags

No chance of driving it on the road either. :roll:

What happened to the one you built

long gone.

_________________
2013 GV
1998 SV420 ute

Joe

I live here!

Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 49041
Location: Rockingham W.A
Vehicle: JB74

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:27 am

Fatzook wrote:

joseph wrote:

Fatzook wrote:

TUFY wrote:

The charged version surely would go much better, I know my old mans commy goes hard.

Still way too heavy for a zook. I know because I've done the conversion. Great rockcrawler. useless for EVERYTHING else. except Mud drags

No chance of driving it on the road either. :roll:

What happened to the one you built

long gone.

Pics

_________________
Joe likes boobs ( . )( . ) ( ° )( ° )

steak_knife

az supporter

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 21335
Location: Smart Ass Island

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:09 am

Bruce wrote:

TUFY wrote:

It's actually an abbreviation of two words so he's sorta right, lol

Don't get all techo with me fella :wink:

I have a chance to shit stir him so I'm goin in hard :wink:

I'm sorta!!!! :roll:

_________________
I used to be indecisive,
now I'm not so sure.....

whincup

az supporter

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:30 pm
Posts: 1588
Location: Gracemere, QLD
Vehicle: '94 suzuki maruti

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:28 am

TUFY wrote:

Would still be fun though. Shoulda kept my old F6 motor lol. That would of been an interestin ride.

as in, out of a tornado/typhoon??? ive often wondered how a zuk would go with one of those under the bonnet... thats surely gotta twist the chassis, nearly 6 times the torque that the sierra motor puts out...

Bruce

az supporter

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 4003
Location: Brisbane

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:30 am

steknig wrote:

Bruce wrote:

TUFY wrote:

It's actually an abbreviation of two words so he's sorta right, lol

Don't get all techo with me fella :wink:

I have a chance to shit stir him so I'm goin in hard :wink:

I'm sorta!!!! :roll:

Yes you are sorta :wink:

_________________
[quote="royce"] I wouldnt mind insulating my rear

Red89

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 2801
Location: Perth

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 9:44 am

Fatzook wrote:

Still way too heavy for a zook. I know because I've done the conversion. Great rockcrawler. useless for EVERYTHING else. except Mud drags

Have seen it work quite well in a crawler.

TUFY

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:30 pm
Posts: 66
Location: Melbourne

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:00 am

whincup wrote:

TUFY wrote:

Would still be fun though. Shoulda kept my old F6 motor lol. That would of been an interestin ride.

Lol yeah Tornado. Had a 350rwkw 6 speed manual from the old ute. Would have been a heap of fun in a car half the weight. If I still had it I would of put it in for sure regardless of the weight distribution.

Maybe I can work out a way of shoe hornin my current 550hp Boss motor in it....

Jester

Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 726
Location: Adelaide
Vehicle: 1985 Suzuki MightyBoy

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:37 am

There was a vit all engineered with one in it on ebay recently SWB too

Fatzook

az supporter

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14977
Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:49 am

whincup wrote:

TUFY wrote:

Would still be fun though. Shoulda kept my old F6 motor lol. That would of been an interestin ride.

Except the F6 motor is a straight six and would not fit in the engine bay.....

_________________
2013 GV
1998 SV420 ute

Fatzook

az supporter

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14977
Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:52 am

joseph wrote:

Fatzook wrote:

joseph wrote:

Fatzook wrote:

TUFY wrote:

The charged version surely would go much better, I know my old mans commy goes hard.

Still way too heavy for a zook. I know because I've done the conversion. Great rockcrawler. useless for EVERYTHING else. except Mud drags

No chance of driving it on the road either. :roll:

What happened to the one you built

long gone.

Pics

I have no digital pics of the engine bay.

_________________
2013 GV
1998 SV420 ute

TUFY

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:30 pm
Posts: 66
Location: Melbourne

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:08 pm

That last pic slightly turns me on...

BlueSuzy

az supporter

Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 9716
Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:30 pm

Or off. Where's the back of the chassis gone?!

_________________

BlueSuzy wrote:

I'm over the G16b's.

Fatzook

az supporter

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14977
Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:31 pm

BlueSuzy wrote:

Or off. Where's the back of the chassis gone?!

it was no longer required

_________________
2013 GV
1998 SV420 ute

Page 1 of 1

[ 29 posts ]

Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 628 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum