| Author |
Message |
chris_mac
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 283 Location: Sydney
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 7:09 am |
|
|
G'day
when previous owner did a G16a conversion in my zook they modified only drivers side engine mount, simply put a spacer made from RHS. hence engine leans on passenger side.
is it something i should be worry about or not.
when you guys did yours conversions did you modified one or both engine mounts, does your engine sit level or leans?
i guess it might be nothing important but it doesn't hurt to know how it should be done properly. thanks
kris
Last edited by chris_mac on Thu Oct 14, 2010 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:34 am |
|
|
Only the driver's side was modified because the passenger's side is OK as-is.
Is the lean causing any problems? If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
chris_mac
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 283 Location: Sydney
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:50 am |
|
thanks Damo
engine lean doesn't cause any problems, as far as i know. i'm just trying to find out if that's how it supposed to be. if that's how you do conversion. I've seen this one:
http://www.lowrangeoffroad.com/suzuki/s ... ounts.html
and was wondering why i have one modified engine mount and one not. low range offers new mounts for both sides so i assumed that maybe i should have both sides modified so the engine sits straight.
if that doesn't matter that engine doesn't sit straight than i won't buy or modify anything, don't want to waste money.
|
|
|
|
 |
steak_knife

az supporter
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 21335 Location: Smart Ass Island
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:08 am |
|
|
I have a set of those mount's on order, I'll tell you how thay go when thay get here..
_________________ I used to be indecisive,
now I'm not so sure.....
|
|
|
|
 |
chris_mac
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 283 Location: Sydney
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:47 am |
|
steak_knife wrote: I have a set of those mount's on order, I'll tell you how thay go when thay get here..
thanks, that'll be great
|
|
|
|
 |
BlueSuzy

az supporter
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 9716 Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:10 pm |
|
|
I have moved the centre hole for both engine mounts as one was twisted when only modifying one. With gearbox mount in stock position.
Have you got a pic of the rhs one?
_________________ BlueSuzy wrote: I'm over the G16b's.
|
|
|
|
 |
BlueSuzy

az supporter
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 9716 Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:10 pm |
|
 Doublepost.
Mines a Baleno Block though.
_________________ BlueSuzy wrote: I'm over the G16b's.
Last edited by BlueSuzy on Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:53 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
|
|
 |
Hybrid

az supporter
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 1095 Location: Bulimba, Brisbane
Vehicle: '92 Sierra
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:39 pm |
|
|
That's weird. With the BenT kit it only uses an RHS spacer on the drivers side and my engine sits straight. What size is the RHS spacer you're using?
|
|
|
|
 |
chris_mac
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 283 Location: Sydney
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:20 am |
|
|
i'll take some photos tomorrow and post them, i have G16a and also vitara gearbox. i think from memory it would be around 25-30mm by 75mm RHS, i've really never measured it
|
|
|
|
 |
chris_mac
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 283 Location: Sydney
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 12:19 pm |
|
here are few pics of RHS and engine lean, i guess it leans around 10 no more then 15 deg from straight. i haven't measured RHS but it looks like 40mm, so what do you think do i have to worry about it?
RHS spacer bottom view:
RHS spacer top view:
engine from the top, you can sort of see the difference between radiator top and rock cover, they don't line up:
engine lean - see how sump sits:
some old picture of front of the engine, easy to see how the lean look like

|
|
|
|
 |
Hybrid

az supporter
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 1095 Location: Bulimba, Brisbane
Vehicle: '92 Sierra
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:39 pm |
|
|
That RHS is a fair bit thicker than mine by the looks. I'll try to remember to measure it tomorrow if you like as my engine is out.
|
|
|
|
 |
tanshi

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 7717 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:44 pm |
|
|
mine is just 25 mm rhs. i wouldnt personally stress about the small amount of lean though
|
|
|
|
 |
BlueSuzy

az supporter
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 9716 Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:56 pm |
|
|
The drivers mount looks bigger. Not by much. max 10mm?
If your eager to staighten it up abit. How is the gearbox mount going to like it? Shifter clearance? Exhaust twist?
Are those steering arms bent or is it the camera playing tricks?
_________________ BlueSuzy wrote: I'm over the G16b's.
|
|
|
|
 |
Hybrid

az supporter
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 1095 Location: Bulimba, Brisbane
Vehicle: '92 Sierra
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:26 pm |
|
BlueSuzy wrote: How is the gearbox mount going to like it?
The gearbox mount was the only thing I could think of that may not like the lean. I would have thought one side would be in tension while the other is in compression. Pretty much like when it's resisting torque but full time.
|
|
|
|
 |
chris_mac
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 283 Location: Sydney
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:10 am |
|
Hybrid wrote: That RHS is a fair bit thicker than mine by the looks. I'll try to remember to measure it tomorrow if you like as my engine is out.
if you can measure it that would be great mate.
steering arms are straight, it was close up picture so it's a camera trick
i guess g-box mount is also not sitting even as g-box 7 engine is not, but it's rather impossible to see that
|
|
|
|
 |
|