It is currently Sun Aug 02, 2026 6:46 am
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:26 pm
Posts: 1770
Location: Perth's RUF

Post Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:21 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
what are the standard tyres size for a sierra

_________________
THINKING BEFORE POSTING!!!

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14977
Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV

Post Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:24 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
205/70 15

_________________
2013 GV
1998 SV420 ute

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 1074
Location: sunshinecoast

Post Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:24 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
not sure but 26" i think

edit: beaten

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13007
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:34 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
H7815 for JX NT's

6.00X16 for "commercial" 1.3's and 1.0 litres.

205/70/15 for WT's (mid 1988 onwards)

Maruti's stuck with H7815 AFAIK.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:26 pm
Posts: 1770
Location: Perth's RUF

Post Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:35 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
cheers

edit: all of you

_________________
THINKING BEFORE POSTING!!!

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:26 pm
Posts: 1770
Location: Perth's RUF

Post Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:37 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
without gearing what should i put on my sierra, i wanna go as big as possible without any gear box probs is 30s pushing it

_________________
THINKING BEFORE POSTING!!!

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14977
Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV

Post Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:44 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
You won't have any gearbox probs. You'll just get sick of changing gears everytime there is a 1 degree incline or someone in the car infront farts, causing the resulting flatulant wind to slow your vehicle. :wink:

No bigger than 30's would be my vote.

_________________
2013 GV
1998 SV420 ute

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13007
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:45 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
30's is borderline depending on the terrain you drive.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 1072
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:59 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I noticed 29's with my 1.3L

Choppy didn't as much with his 1.6L

I have 1lt transfer case now and its much better

_________________
My Rig --> Click WWW

 Profile WWW  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:03 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
215/75r15 if you want to keep a usable low range... if you're driving sand a 235 would be "get-away-with-able" in my opinion.

dont forget a 215/75r15 is 6.5% larger than factory... so when the speedo reads 100km/hr you're really doing 106.6 etc... same affects your lower down speeds... where right now you might do say 1000 rpm in 1st gear, crawling along... rev it to around 1100rpm and imagine that being the slowest you can go.

there comes a point where you're just going too fast to be controlled going over things and end up riding the clutch all day to keep it slow.

_________________
Image

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 9:23 pm
Posts: 263
Location: brissy

Post Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:53 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
I got 30's with the standard 1.3 n gearing.
Hills r not your friend:/
Ended up in 2nd on the highway haha

_________________
If in doubt power out!


Last edited by ando_zook94 on Wed Apr 27, 2011 11:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:55 pm
Posts: 9348
Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: G13BB Jimny

Post Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 11:07 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Geez.. I've got 31's and just barely had to drop back to 3rd up a hill.
But agree that it's crap without gearing mods. I wouldn't go up from 235's without gearing.

_________________
mlm

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 218
Location: perth

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:10 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Ive got 235 on mine .untouched gears.I can notice it but still very drivable on the highway and low range..wouldnt go any bigger..after awhile you forget what stockos drive like anyway.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 2535
Location: Perth
Vehicle: 93 Sierra

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:50 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I had 235/75R15's on mine with stock gearing ... fine on the highway (better even) but not great offroad. Burnt way too much clutch saving the rest of the driveline.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:26 pm
Posts: 1770
Location: Perth's RUF

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:55 am 
Reply with quote Top  
i dont realy care if i have to piss other drivers of by going slow, but i do care if ima need a new clutch. sigh i was thinking 28s but i wanna go bigger

_________________
THINKING BEFORE POSTING!!!

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:26 pm
Posts: 1770
Location: Perth's RUF

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:55 am 
Reply with quote Top  
recon the small tyres r gona look shite with a 4 inch lift

_________________
THINKING BEFORE POSTING!!!

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14977
Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:56 am 
Reply with quote Top  
SSSIERA wrote:
recon the small tyres r gona look shite with a 4 inch lift


Yep!

_________________
2013 GV
1998 SV420 ute

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:55 pm
Posts: 9348
Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: G13BB Jimny

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:11 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Yeah that's a given. Stock tyres look crap on a TWO inch lift.

_________________
mlm

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter

Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:18 am
Posts: 1376
Location: Avonsleigh, Victoria

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:32 am 
Reply with quote Top  
My lwb has 215, 75, 15's and thats whats one the tire placard so i thought it was standard. Mine is an 85 n/t lwb and its also the smallest bfg will do a km2 muddy altho you can't get the buggers atm.
Dave

_________________
Life's short, fiddle with your willy while you can

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13007
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:53 am 
Reply with quote Top  
bohuler wrote:
My lwb has 215, 75, 15's and thats whats one the tire placard so i thought it was standard. Mine is an 85 n/t lwb and its also the smallest bfg will do a km2 muddy altho you can't get the buggers atm.
Dave


I don't believe you. I have an 86 N/T LWB and it's H 78 15.

Personally, I think 215 is too small to spend money on. A 235 is a much better option.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter

Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:18 am
Posts: 1376
Location: Avonsleigh, Victoria

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:32 am 
Reply with quote Top  
ok i stand corrected. i would of sworn that they said 215 :p So can you explain why the fu&*k don't they have the tyre size. WTF does FR 78-15 mean?
Image

Could someone explain the number here?

Dave

_________________
Life's short, fiddle with your willy while you can

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2447
Vehicle: LJ50V, SJ70

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:12 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Gwagensteve wrote:
bohuler wrote:
My lwb has 215, 75, 15's and thats whats one the tire placard so i thought it was standard. Mine is an 85 n/t lwb and its also the smallest bfg will do a km2 muddy altho you can't get the buggers atm.
Dave


I don't believe you. I have an 86 N/T LWB and it's H 78 15.

Steve.


Can we see a pic of the H78 15 placard? I've always thought the JX NT's were FR78 Bridgestones?

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2447
Vehicle: LJ50V, SJ70

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:21 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
bohuler wrote:
So can you explain why the fu&*k don't they have the tyre size. WTF does FR 78-15 mean?

Could someone explain the number here?

Dave


FR78 15 is an older tyre size, but not as old as the 6.00-16 style sizing. The 78 means it is a 78% aspect ratio tyre, while sizes A, B, C etc get bigger. The R means it's a radial tyre. 15 is for a 15" rim. A FR78 15 is approximately equivalent to a 205/75-15. Note that the widetracks had a 205/70-15 tyre, which is lower profile than a FR78 and smaller diameter, which is why they changed from 3.9 diffs to 3.7.

6.00-16 is a 100% aspect ratio tyre that nominally is 6 inches in section width and 6 inches in height (although they are rarely exactly these dimensions) for a 16" rim.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:30 pm
Posts: 1260
Location: Vic

Post Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:26 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Gwagensteve wrote:
H7815 for JX NT's

6.00X16 for "commercial" 1.3's and 1.0 litres.

205/70/15 for WT's (mid 1988 onwards)

Maruti's stuck with H7815 AFAIK.

Steve.


So going by this the NT 1.3 was known as a commercial?

What measurement in our current sizes do these compare too?
EG a 30/9.5 or 29?? 31??

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 2447
Vehicle: LJ50V, SJ70

Post Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:34 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
There were 2 spec levels for the NT Sierras, JA and JX.

JA was the commercial or basic version and had 6.00-16 bar tread tyres. The body had no flares, there was no Tacho or dash clock, vinyl floor mats and low-back seats.

JX had FR78-15 tyres, small rubber flares, Tacho and clock, carpets and cloth seats in Hard-top, full-floor mats in soft-top and better vinyl sears with headrests.

1.0 JA soft-tops had half doors (like Drover). Hi-roof was only available as JX

205/75-15 = 670mm = 26.4in.

FR78-15 = 690mm = 27.1in.

6.00-16 = 725mm = 28.1in.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 16343
Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.

Post Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:40 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
http://www.turbinecar.com/tires.htm

has a good chart.

the 6.00-16 is what most people use to argue engineering a larger tyre size too, cos going from a 28 to a 31 is only a 10.7% increase rather than the 19.2% increase over a 205/70r15.

_________________
Image

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13007
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:57 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
303zuke wrote:

Can we see a pic of the H78 15 placard? I've always thought the JX NT's were FR78 Bridgestones?


My bad - F78 not H78.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:26 pm
Posts: 1770
Location: Perth's RUF

Post Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:10 am 
Reply with quote Top  
:blink: TO MANY DIFFERENT NUMBERS :crazy:

_________________
THINKING BEFORE POSTING!!!

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 3461
Location: licking some windows
Vehicle: LJ20 LJ50

Post Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:14 am 
Reply with quote Top  
303zuke wrote:
bohuler wrote:
So can you explain why the fu&*k don't they have the tyre size. WTF does FR 78-15 mean?

Could someone explain the number here?

Dave


FR78 15 is an older tyre size, but not as old as the 6.00-16 style sizing. The 78 means it is a 78% aspect ratio tyre, while sizes A, B, C etc get bigger. The R means it's a radial tyre. 15 is for a 15" rim. A FR78 15 is approximately equivalent to a [url=http://tireguides.com/print_friendly2.asp?.


The alpha numeric size tyres where about load ratings. The letter dictated how much load a tyre could carry. Stupid american attempt at sizing. Wish they would just get with the metric system....

_________________
Camels have nice toes

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm
Posts: 34842
Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's

Post Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:32 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Gwagensteve wrote:
bohuler wrote:
My lwb has 215, 75, 15's and thats whats one the tire placard so i thought it was standard. Mine is an 85 n/t lwb and its also the smallest bfg will do a km2 muddy altho you can't get the buggers atm.
Dave


I don't believe you. I have an 86 N/T LWB and it's H 78 15.

Personally, I think 215 is too small to spend money on. A 235 is a much better option.

Steve.


don't believe tyre placards, they are adjustable... :lol:

Image

_________________
You're just hating because you don't understand

 Profile WWW  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 54 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours