| Author |
Message |
nicktoozoff
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:01 am Posts: 25 Location: Moruya NSW
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 12:29 am |
|
Hi All,
I am looking at putting new feet on my 94 LWB Vitara. It is currently running stock 205/75/R15's but would like to run 215/75 or 85/R15's. I am not running any lift (yet  ) as this is a daily driver.
I am looking for recommendations for AT style tyres in the middle to upper price range.
Cheers Nick.
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 12:47 am |
|
|
when you say AT, what percentages or terrains do you drive?
-Road
-Rock
-Mud
-Sand
for me its like this:
-Road -80% (daily driver)
-Rock -20%
-Mud -0% (lately, cos theres no rain although prefer 10%)
Sand -0% (hate the stuff)
I'm running Kumho KL71 and also have a set of BFG KM2 - both are great and wearing well (ie: not at all) - i have great grip on roads dry and wet, and offroad i've got good tread for what i do. I honestly consider these tyres AT's because they suit all the terrain i drive. If i drove sand as well however it'd be a different story i think.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
nicktoozoff
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:01 am Posts: 25 Location: Moruya NSW
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 12:57 am |
|
|
It will be about 80% black stuff with 20% dirt. No rock crawling in this one just yet, and minimal Mud (those days are a bit behind me). I have looked at the Kuhmo AT KL78 and they seem OK. What did you pay for your
KL 71's?
Nick
|
|
|
|
 |
nicktoozoff
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:01 am Posts: 25 Location: Moruya NSW
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 2:03 am |
|
|
I think I have the tyres measurements a bit confused. Can someone explain what 215/75/R15 means. I understand that R = Radial, 15 is the rim size in Inches, what does the 215/75 mean?
Cheers Nick.
|
|
|
|
 |
Jester
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 726 Location: Adelaide
Vehicle: 1985 Suzuki MightyBoy
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 3:04 am |
|
|
215 means the tread face is 215mm wide and the 75 means that the sidewall is 75% of the treadface
|
|
|
|
 |
nicktoozoff
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:01 am Posts: 25 Location: Moruya NSW
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 3:08 am |
|
|
So, with that in mind, an 85 aspect tyre should be taller than a 75 then?
Nick.
p.s. Thanks, Jester for your reply!!
|
|
|
|
 |
whincup

az supporter
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 1588 Location: Gracemere, QLD
Vehicle: '94 suzuki maruti
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 4:29 am |
|
nicktoozoff wrote: So, with that in mind, an 85 aspect tyre should be taller than a 75 then?
yes, by about one and a half inches.
|
|
|
|
 |
shandy92

az supporter
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 5066 Location: perth, Australia
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 4:37 am |
|
|
mate, i ran 235/75/15 (29") on my swb vitara with no lift for almost 2 yrs, i had some rubbing issues but only because of the off-set rim that i had. if i had bought new tyres again before i got lift, i would get 30's. but thats only me.
i ran maxis 751 AT, they did everything (sand, mud, rock, gravel, road) when i got semi stuck it wasnt because of the tyres but clearance, travel and open diff's. only bad thing about the 751's was the wet rd handling, they spun fairly easily. but would recommend them ....and buy them again.
|
|
|
|
 |
whincup

az supporter
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 1588 Location: Gracemere, QLD
Vehicle: '94 suzuki maruti
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 10:09 am |
|
|
i'll basically say exactly the same thing about BFG A/Ts... i have a set of 215/75R15's on my sierra, and i've only ever been stuck due to clearance. again, absolutely terrible on wet tarmac, but will outdo almost any other tyre on gravel. they just love the stuff. also not fantastic on sand, but still do a good job.
only reason i wont be buying them again is that i'm upgrading to a cheap M/T but would definitely recommend them. cost me ~$250 each for that size fitted.
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 10:31 am |
|
|
i think thats the biggest issue with most AT tyres... theyre more aggressive than a road tyre but not as much as an offroad tyre (a muddy).. so theyre just "OK" on all surfaces but dont really shine in any other than perhaps dry road.
thats why i asked about the percentages you drive of each, as that will help determine the tyre you choose.
if youre doing lots of road and just some bush tracks go for an all out road tyre - you'll get better economy, less noise and realistically you're not ever going to get stuck on a bush track anyway (if you do you still have 4wd to get out).
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
nicktoozoff
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:01 am Posts: 25 Location: Moruya NSW
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 10:40 am |
|
|
Thanks for all your input guys. I have priced the Kumho KL78's (215/75/R15) and at $195 ea fitted they fit the budget and should do evrything I want.
Thanks again for your help.
Cheers Nick.
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 11:00 am |
|
|
that price seems high??? i got KL71 in 31x10.5r15 fitted for $190ea. (i had bought from the store before though and they looked after me).
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 11:05 am |
|
alien wrote: that price seems high??? i got KL71 in 31x10.5r15 fitted for $190ea. (i had bought from the store before though and they looked after me).
Thats about right actually.
I paid $215ea for my 225/75 16's.
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
royce

omnipotent being
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 17216 Location: Pluto
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 11:07 am |
|
whincup wrote: nicktoozoff wrote: So, with that in mind, an 85 aspect tyre should be taller than a 75 then?
yes, by about one and a half inches.
its a 400mm wide tyre?
I have Wrangler ATR/s they are a good not cheap crap tyre, on my 3rd set now
|
|
|
|
 |
whincup

az supporter
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 1588 Location: Gracemere, QLD
Vehicle: '94 suzuki maruti
|
 Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 11:28 am |
|
royce wrote: whincup wrote: nicktoozoff wrote: So, with that in mind, an 85 aspect tyre should be taller than a 75 then?
yes, by about one and a half inches. its a 400mm wide tyre?I have Wrangler ATR/s they are a good not cheap crap tyre, on my 3rd set now
taller, not wider. 215/85R15 over 215/75R15. sorry, should have specified height...
|
|
|
|
 |
|