| Author |
Message |
screwloose
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 12:14 am Posts: 111 Location: wollongong
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:13 am |
|
|
I am wondering about reversing the front springs on my Sierra, so the fixed point is at the front and shackle at the rear.
Is it possible to do? Pro's and con's?
Has anyone done it? The main reason is for approach angle.
|
|
|
|
 |
94BAZOOKA
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:40 am Posts: 537 Location: central coast NSW
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:14 am |
|
|
Anything is possible
And yes it has been done
_________________ F#%ING [P] PLATER
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:18 am |
|
|
its acutally a shackle reversal - however to achieve one without stuffing steering angles you need to run "fangs" on the front, which often give you a worse approach angle than what you started with.
it is possible to do it without this by having the top bushes of the shackle go through the chassis rail rather than attaching to a mount hanging off the chassis, then the fixed end sitting hard against the chassis on a custom mount, but you'd still experience issues with castor angles.
to see how its been done before, google "calmini shackle reverse" - which is a bolt on kit.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
Ben_Sierra

az supporter
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4472 Location: Perth
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:19 am |
|
_________________ I want my old sig back 
|
|
|
|
 |
joel
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 2191 Location: Dirranbandi
Vehicle: Sj70 tintop
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:23 am |
|
|
you mean reverse the shackle?
the spring will stay the direction it already is and the shackle is moved to the back?
if thats what your talking about, i have just done it (yesterday)
calmini kit
flexes well and feels very stable on road. its pretty easy to install.
longer front springs will work better.
zookers in the u.s swear by them, a lot here hate the idea without actually seeing or trying it, its a mixed bag.
bad points, calmini 2" shackle reversal kit (including 2" boomerang shackles for the rear) is expensive. if you are on a tight budget you could probably do a cheap RUF for the same price and have a better result. but if you combine the two it is pretty good.
_________________ Sj70 tintop
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:27 am |
|
|
the reason most yanks like it is cos they run 35" tyres and bigger on their sierras, so the loss in approach angle isnt as easily noticed for them.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
SierraDan

az supporter
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:55 pm Posts: 9348 Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: G13BB Jimny
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:32 am |
|
|
Parked next to a sierra with the Calmini shackle reversal on standard OME springs today. I see no benefit..
_________________ mlm
|
|
|
|
 |
joeblow
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 3273 Location: melbourne
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:40 am |
|
|
Waste of time. don't do it. It has no real benefit.
_________________ builder of custom road legal zooks......and stuff.
|
|
|
|
 |
joel
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 2191 Location: Dirranbandi
Vehicle: Sj70 tintop
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:41 am |
|
alien wrote: the reason most yanks like it is cos they run 35" tyres and bigger on their sierras, so the loss in approach angle isnt as easily noticed for them.
i havent lost any approach angle, the towers are still above the bottom of the bull bar. i think mine works well, feels nice anyway.
will give an offroad report in due time.
_________________ Sj70 tintop
|
|
|
|
 |
86slowsierra

az supporter
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 724 Location: Melbourne
Vehicle: nt sierra
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:46 am |
|
|
you wouldnt see the benefit. you'd feel it.
it would soften out the bumps, the tire would move back when it hits a bump with the reversal. this is obviously the opposite of how it is stock.
i recon its better having the shackle up front as it forces the tire to bounce forward and out rather than back and up.
also the 'fangs' it creates are fairly bad for approach angle.
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:53 am |
|
|
spring travelling backwards on climbing can be bad though, you'd have less 'bite' climbing a steep rock for instance as the tyre moves backwards into the wheel arch as it compresses, so the approach angle worsens a touch more.
obviously theres also the whole issue of sierras hitting the back of the wheel arch already as well, aiding that by doing a SR without a wheelbase extension is a recipe for major scrubbing on anything larger than a 28" tyre.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 9:03 am |
|
joeblow wrote: Waste of time. don't do it. It has no real benefit.
X2 - and there's lots of theory on this thread but very little real experience.
I shackle reversed my car years ago. I had slightly better steering and tracking after the reversal, but approach angle doesn't improve and as the shackle has to run under the chassis at roughly the firewall, you end up with a bigger anchor back there too.
It's also a lot of fabrication.
I wouldn't do it again.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
joel
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 2191 Location: Dirranbandi
Vehicle: Sj70 tintop
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 9:07 am |
|
|
i didnt have to fab anything. i will see how it goes, meh i will run a ruf soon anyways.
_________________ Sj70 tintop
|
|
|
|
 |
joel
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 2191 Location: Dirranbandi
Vehicle: Sj70 tintop
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 9:08 am |
|
|
who is the bloke on here who has the red ute with the custom shackle reversal? the red mofockle racing thingy? he got some pretty good results from it.
_________________ Sj70 tintop
|
|
|
|
 |
madmacca

az supporter
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 8:46 am Posts: 928 Location: Lesmurdie W.A.
Vehicle: X-90 + Lwb Sierra + DeVitt +++
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 9:27 am |
|
|
|
 |
joel
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 2191 Location: Dirranbandi
Vehicle: Sj70 tintop
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 9:29 am |
|
|
yeah that one, i love that build.
_________________ Sj70 tintop
|
|
|
|
 |
skyman
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:06 pm Posts: 1328 Location: Yakima, wa (us)
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 6:52 am |
|
|
It works well for specific reasons.
Weigh the pros and cons, fab a shackle reversal yourself to negate some of the cons (like bad approach and fangs).
If ride is more important than approach, you want to extend your wheel base, you like to drive fast on whoops, then it may be for you.
For others it has absolutely no use. Myself I am getting older and I like a nice cushy ride. I may try to favricate my own one day, if for anything a better ride.
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34842 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:07 am |
|
|
ever bolted the front truck of a skateboard on backwards & tried skating it?
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
joeblow
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 3273 Location: melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 9:19 am |
|
atari4x4 wrote: ever bolted the front truck of a skateboard on backwards & tried skating it?
edzackery.
_________________ builder of custom road legal zooks......and stuff.
|
|
|
|
 |
kenn
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 1202 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:14 am |
|
Just ask Moose what happens when you do that. 
|
|
|
|
 |
|