It is currently Thu Jul 23, 2026 9:05 am
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 285
Location: Hobart
Vehicle: SJ80

Post Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:57 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Hey guys, just a quick question regarding the model of my sierra. It's an 89 wt soft top, id plate states it as a d-ute 1.3 sj50. How is it that most sj50s I have seen are nt models? I heard someone mention an 89.5 (as in year of manufacture) model and wondered if that's what mine is? I guess it's a mix of sj50 and sj70 parts cobbled together as the model was changing but I could be very wrong! Any clarification would be much appreciated! Cheers!

Bronson.

 Profile  

Offline
omnipotent being
omnipotent being
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 17216
Location: Pluto

Post Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:09 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
all sj70 will be WT

the 88.5 WT was called an SJ50,I dont think they ever called them an SJ70 and I dont think any sj50 WT ever had the steel flares either.

you should have WT width flares but made of plastic and not steel, a WT dash and possible NT 3.9 diff centres,

I think the bits that seem to move around the most are you can have either diff centre and either driveshaft, I dont think any of them had a transfer handbrake

pretty sure they all had the NT version of motor and box as well.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 285
Location: Hobart
Vehicle: SJ80

Post Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:16 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Interesting. Mine copped the steel flares (i know they're steel, had to beat them back into shape with a hammer once!) and judging by the complete lack of modification on the vehicle when we bought it back in the mid 90s, i'd say they are factory fitted. Not sure about the diff centres tho. Never had them out. Thanks for that matey!

Edit: Dash is wt, 1.3 is 1324cc and no transfer handbrake.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 14498
Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny

Post Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:21 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
my 89 hard top is a sj50 and the only difference that i have found is it had
the 1324cc instead of the sj70 1296cc motor.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 4454
Location: Botany, NSW
Vehicle: MY2019 Jimny

Post Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:39 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
1324 is a drover donk isn't it?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:30 pm
Posts: 1157
Location: VIC
Vehicle: WR250F/Jeep XJ

Post Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:01 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
My 88.5 was a bitsa...

3.7 diff gears, WT diffs, plastic flares, NT diff flanges !!!

 Profile WWW  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 2068
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:22 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
1324 is g13a early 1.3 they changed them to 1298 for some racing class or something

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 1009
Location: Sydney -ish
Vehicle: 92 Suzuki Sierra

Post Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:30 am 
Reply with quote Top  
i think the g13 switched from 'A' 1324cc to 'B' 1298cc block once the gti made its debut
the gti had to be under 1300cc to fit in the lower rally class and from a tooling oint of view everything followed suit ( the 'b' block has extra mounting holes for accesories and a knock sensor location)

the 1324cc WT tracks where probably suzuki using up its stockpiles since by 88 'jimnys wides had be phased out domestically for the next 5 years or so

_________________
-Santos

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 11:30 pm
Posts: 3273
Location: melbourne

Post Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:45 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Santos wrote:
i think the g13 switched from 'A' 1324cc to 'B' 1298cc block once the gti made its debut
the gti had to be under 1300cc to fit in the lower rally class and from a tooling oint of view everything followed suit ( the 'b' block has extra mounting holes for accesories and a knock sensor location)

the 1324cc WT tracks where probably suzuki using up its stockpiles since by 88 'jimnys wides had be phased out domestically for the next 5 years or so


suzuki were being taxed for producing a 1.4 litre, which is a big thing in japan, so they down sized the motor so to be taxed as a 1.3 litre. wide tracks were introduced to please the overseas market mainly, but you could buy a wt 1.3 in japan if you could justify the hefty extra cost. ( 1.3 wt's in japan were like the sahara version of landcruiser)

_________________
builder of custom road legal zooks......and stuff.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 2068
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:35 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
more for insurance and everything over there for a wide :), nearly impossible to find pics of JB32W (looks like aussie coil sierra but has g13bb) but you can find heaps of the JA12W (coily with no flares NT 660cc turbo)

Image also someone get me some of these fancy slimline weather sheilds lol

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 65 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours