| Author |
Message |
VitNick
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 8:47 am Posts: 302
Vehicle: 92 WT Sierra
|
 Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 10:19 pm |
|
|
Hi all, Wanted to know if alloy wheels are fine to use offroad. I know they are known to split and crack and not bend like steel rims. But on a light weight zook surely they can't crack that easily. Just being a tight uni student who's trying to save on buying new rims. Has anyone had their alloys crack offroad, I've seen ome cracked alloy but it was smashed into a gutter at speed
Thanks VitNick
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 10:22 pm |
|
|
They'll be fine mate. Unless you plan to use it for comps.....
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
jdk81
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2372 Location: Ballarat, VIC
|
 Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 6:15 am |
|
|
I had a wheel smash into something pretty solid, in a car incident/crash type event, which I would hardly consider normal wheeling. It cracked away a tiny part of lip, and it gouged the alloy too. It was still fine to use until getting it changed etc. This was an extreme event and a product of my stupidity and poor judgement.
But in general wheeling they were absolutely fine, and I punished my car pretty hard. Christover has those alloys now (except the damaged one, its in my shed as an air hose holder).
|
|
|
|
 |
christover1

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 8203 Location: Melbourne
Vehicle: Pajero 91 NH 3.0 SWB
|
 Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 7:53 am |
|
|
I'll report back here after a few years of off roading and touring. Have already noticed an improvement in braking, steering and power with road use. Could be a big improvement in longer touring trips. I also decreased my track a little, which would also account for improvements.
|
|
|
|
 |
VitNick
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 8:47 am Posts: 302
Vehicle: 92 WT Sierra
|
 Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 8:22 am |
|
|
Thanks heaps, looks like im keeping the alloys. Thanks again for replying so quick
|
|
|
|
 |
Ausuki
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:22 pm Posts: 99
Vehicle: 93 Vitara -itty bitty lift
|
 Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:45 pm |
|
christover1 wrote: I'll report back here after a few years of off roading and touring. Have already noticed an improvement in braking, steering and power with road use. Could be a big improvement in longer touring trips. I also decreased my track a little, which would also account for improvements. Im surprised they make a noticeable difference, i though youd only be talking about a couple of kg each. Have you logged any fuel figures?
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34843 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:51 pm |
|
christover1 wrote: I'll report back here after a few years of off roading and touring. Have already noticed an improvement in braking, steering and power with road use. Could be a big improvement in longer touring trips. I also decreased my track a little, which would also account for improvements. what did one of the alloys weigh on their own?
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
christover1

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 8203 Location: Melbourne
Vehicle: Pajero 91 NH 3.0 SWB
|
 Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:58 pm |
|
Only just fitted, so nothing measured fuel use wise. Did weigh them with tyres fitted, and without. Some weight loss is from smaller tyre, some is because of using non retreads, some from no tube. As stated gains expected from narrower track, tyre, lower height and less wind drag and less rotation resistance My heaviest tyre / steel wheel combo was 33kg each, had 2 of those on rear.. Worn 31's on steelies were 27kg, those 2 were on front. New 30's on alloys are 22kg each. I did weigh alloy rim by itself, but weight has escaped my memory Think it was around 9 or 10 kg. In process of lightening camper and its wheels, too.
|
|
|
|
 |
christover1

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 8203 Location: Melbourne
Vehicle: Pajero 91 NH 3.0 SWB
|
 Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:59 pm |
|
|
PS my scales are very dodgy
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34843 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 6:05 pm |
|
|
alloys are only 1kg maybe 2kgs lighter, a 15x7 steely is 11kgs.
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
christover1

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 8203 Location: Melbourne
Vehicle: Pajero 91 NH 3.0 SWB
|
 Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 6:07 pm |
|
|
Sounds about right, wasn't a lot in it.
Lot of weight loss in losing the remoulds.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rhinoman
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 7:03 pm Posts: 686 Location: Brinkworth, England
|
 Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 9:09 pm |
|
|
I weighed a set of 8 x 15 American Racing Alloys once, they were 50% heavier than the 7 x 15 steels I put on there instead. Not that surprising really as they were 10mm thick whereas the steels were 2mm thick and aluminium is only 1/3 the weight of steel. The stock alloys got scratched and gouged when used off road and very soon started to look nasty.
|
|
|
|
 |
want33s

az supporter
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 8135 Location: Sunshine Coast Qld
|
 Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 9:35 pm |
|
I ran these for a few years with 38mm spacers and Staun internal beadlocks. I have no dramas at all with alloys for onroad/casual offroad use. 
|
|
|
|
 |
VitNick
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 8:47 am Posts: 302
Vehicle: 92 WT Sierra
|
 Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:27 am |
|
|
Sounds good, I'm curious now after what christover1 said to see what my economy will be. I'm looking at using retreads which the added weight/ rolling resistance. I will keep track of how my economy goes now, and once I put the retreads on I'll post up the numbers
|
|
|
|
 |
upgarage
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 1:34 pm Posts: 124 Location: Perth, WA
Vehicle: MG410
|
 Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 10:13 am |
|
atari4x4 wrote: alloys are only 1kg maybe 2kgs lighter, a 15x7 steely is 11kgs. Not sure how you got those figures 15x8 Pro comp alloy =7.25kg Pro comp steel = 14.5kg
|
|
|
|
 |
christover1

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 8203 Location: Melbourne
Vehicle: Pajero 91 NH 3.0 SWB
|
 Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 10:31 am |
|
|
That was from my quoted weight on my alloys, but dodgy scales and dodgy memory, could be inaccurate.
I guess it also depends on other factors in the wheel build. My steelies were not heavy duty builds, either.
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34843 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 11:12 am |
|
upgarage wrote: atari4x4 wrote: alloys are only 1kg maybe 2kgs lighter, a 15x7 steely is 11kgs. Not sure how you got those figures 15x8 Pro comp alloy =7.25kg Pro comp steel = 14.5kg what style of procomp, the ones with the small round holes will have more metal in them than the sunny style rims + you're quoting a 15x8 & that's got to have more metal in it again. i got it straight from the speedy wheels website, but i rounded it up for the slow kids up the back. they actually weight 10.687kgs. http://www.speedywheels.com/2011/specif ... tWhite.pdfnot sure how you got those figures. 
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
|