It is currently Fri Jul 31, 2026 8:56 am
Board index » Talking About Stuff » Suzuki Talk



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
Author Message

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 262
Location: Sydney
Vehicle: 1989 hard top

Post Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:59 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Just wanna know what engine conversions are easiest / most affective , not having to chop shit / make up all custom shit , won't cost a million buks !! I have a g13a plenty of power off road but just want some more balls for road use , seeming as I travel up the mountains a poo load and going to be doing more free way driving , any decent upgrades for the g13a without drinking more fuel I'm allready geting around 250km to a full tank probly like 35 litters tanks had a few dings !! I'm not chasing silly horse power just good fuel and a tad more get up and goo !! Any help and advice would be much appreciated :) :D

 Profile  

Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 4:30 am
Posts: 37
Vehicle: 2003 Jimny

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:16 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I'm thinking a G16B upgrade would be pretty easy :)

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13007
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:48 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Easiest and most effective aren't quite the same thing,

Easiest would be a G16A. Personally I think these are nothing special and are now getting quite hard to find in good condition. 55Kw/120ishNm

Most effective would be a G16B. Quite an easy swap if you find a vitara one, bit more complex if you find a Baleno one, but Baleno motors are cheap and easy to find, and generally newer and fresher than Vitara motors. 75Kw/127Nm

In between is the G13B GTi. From a difficulty point of view, somewhere between a G16A and G16B, but GTi motors aren't well suited to 4WD use as the power band is very high in the rev range. They do make 75Kw though.

However, I just skimmed though your build thread and I can't tell if you've done your gearing yet. If you haven't, it's not surprising that you're unhappy with your performance and economy.

Steve.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:30 pm
Posts: 8134
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:49 am 
Reply with quote Top  
250km/35l sounds like you need a proper tune up more than anything else.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 262
Location: Sydney
Vehicle: 1989 hard top

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:59 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Gwagensteve wrote:
Easiest and most effective aren't quite the same thing,

Easiest would be a G16A. Personally I think these are nothing special and are now getting quite hard to find in good condition. 55Kw/120ishNm

Most effective would be a G16B. Quite an easy swap if you find a vitara one, bit more complex if you find a Baleno one, but Baleno motors are cheap and easy to find, and generally newer and fresher than Vitara motors. 75Kw/127Nm

In between is the G13B GTi. From a difficulty point of view, somewhere between a G16A and G16B, but GTi motors aren't well suited to 4WD use as the power band is very high in the rev range. They do make 75Kw though.

However, I just skimmed though your build thread and I can't tell if you've done your gearing yet. If you haven't, it's not surprising that you're unhappy with your performance and economy.

Steve.

Thanks mate , na no gearing as yet what diff ratios are best ?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 262
Location: Sydney
Vehicle: 1989 hard top

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 6:01 am 
Reply with quote Top  
want33s wrote:
250km/35l sounds like you need a proper tune up more than anything else.
what kms per tank do thay usally get ?? I've done a tune up ATM no better maby the carbi but runs fine ??

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:49 pm
Posts: 161
Location: Parkside
Vehicle: Suzuki/Sierra/1988 SJ50 HiTop

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 6:10 am 
Reply with quote Top  
I fitted a Swift TBI injection system (the engine was rebuilt completely just before I bought the hightop Sierra). Improvement in economy 10-20 % depending on driving conditions (up to 12 kpl highway). Performance improvement 10 kph faster on the steep freeway up track to Crafers from Adelaide (90 kph versus 80 kph flat-out). Although the fuel consumption dropped, the range between tank fills hasn't increase because I can't run the tank to empty. I suspect my fuel injection pump is creating a vortex in the tank (I should have found a lower flow rate pump than the Bosch unit I fitted).

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 262
Location: Sydney
Vehicle: 1989 hard top

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 6:31 am 
Reply with quote Top  
johnmath wrote:
I fitted a Swift TBI injection system (the engine was rebuilt completely just before I bought the hightop Sierra). Improvement in economy 10-20 % depending on driving conditions (up to 12 kpl highway). Performance improvement 10 kph faster on the steep freeway up track to Crafers from Adelaide (90 kph versus 80 kph flat-out). Although the fuel consumption dropped, the range between tank fills hasn't increase because I can't run the tank to empty. I suspect my fuel injection pump is creating a vortex in the tank (I should have found a lower flow rate pump than the Bosch unit I fitted).

You fitted that to a g13a?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13007
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 6:51 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Are you adding 17% to your economy figures to correct your tyres? That will improve things a bit.

6.5 transfer for nsw and 31's

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 262
Location: Sydney
Vehicle: 1989 hard top

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 8:32 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Gwagensteve wrote:
Are you adding 17% to your economy figures to correct your tyres? That will improve things a bit.

6.5 transfer for nsw and 31's

I'm not sure I know what you meen ?

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:30 pm
Posts: 1588
Location: Gracemere, QLD
Vehicle: '94 suzuki maruti

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 8:49 am 
Reply with quote Top  
when you fit larger tires, you are making your gear ratio's taller. taking off on larger tires in 1st gear is similar to taking off in 2nd gear on standard size tires. imagine what this means for 5th gear... the engine just doesnt have the torque to push the car along at speed in 5th, you need to use more throttle = more fuel used.

you get reduction gears in the transfer, it shortens the gear ratios. the engine will rev higher in any given gear at the same speed but it will do it with less effort = less fuel used.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 13007
Location: Melbourne

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:13 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Your odometer won't be reading accurately because of your 31's. If you travel 250km on your odometer, you're actually travelling almost 300km, which is much better economy. Not great, but not too bad for a carby sierra with crap gearing.

If you have already corrected the km figure then that's terrible economy.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 262
Location: Sydney
Vehicle: 1989 hard top

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:30 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Na I haven't corrected it :) ok that makes sense !! If you place reduction gears in the transfer won't it just affect the gearing of the 4x4 ?? No idea .. I was looking at 6.5s but thought that was just for 4x4

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 9242
Location: maito
Vehicle: <3 Edna <3

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:33 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Nup, will correct highrange and lowrange

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 262
Location: Sydney
Vehicle: 1989 hard top

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:37 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Yeah as I thought , so diff ratios ?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 2801
Location: Perth

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:41 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Tc gears work for both on and offroad.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 262
Location: Sydney
Vehicle: 1989 hard top

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:44 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Red89 wrote:
Tc gears work for both on and offroad.

Ohhh how so ?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 5517
Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:47 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Hills4x4#1 wrote:
Yeah as I thought , so diff ratios ?


Nope! Just get yourself a set of transfer case gears. They lower both on and offroad gearing (high and low gear ratios are lowered) and are a much better/cheaper/simpler solution then diff gears. With the 6.5s in you will be able to crawl up obstacles without abusing and slipping the clutch. On road it will almost feel like a gear difference ie 5th will feel closer to 4th and place the engine in its happy rev range. Once you have done the gears then decide if you need more power.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 5517
Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:50 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Also noticed you finally came around and done the RUF to your rig and was quite impressed with how it went. Well these transfercase gears will completely transform your car! More so then the RUF.

 Profile  

Offline
az supporter
az supporter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:11 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Oberon, NSW
Vehicle: Drover pickup turk

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:55 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Hills4x4#1 wrote:
I was looking at 6.5s but thought that was just for 4x4


If you were looking at the 6.5s on lowrange did you notice the gearing chart on the top of the page?
Notice the reduction percentages in both low and high range.

http://www.lowrangeoffroad.com/index.ph ... -case.html

_________________
Quote:
I like the tuna here

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 262
Location: Sydney
Vehicle: 1989 hard top

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:08 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Blkfxx wrote:
Hills4x4#1 wrote:
I was looking at 6.5s but thought that was just for 4x4


If you were looking at the 6.5s on lowrange did you notice the gearing chart on the top of the page?
Notice the reduction percentages in both low and high range.

http://www.lowrangeoffroad.com/index.ph ... -case.html

Hay mate na didn't look into it just seen how a mates car went with 6.5s so it works for 2wd high range ?

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:03 pm
Posts: 262
Location: Sydney
Vehicle: 1989 hard top

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:09 am 
Reply with quote Top  
JrZook wrote:
Also noticed you finally came around and done the RUF to your rig and was quite impressed with how it went. Well these transfercase gears will completely transform your car! More so then the RUF.

Thanks mate was about time I woke up to myself :)

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 2801
Location: Perth

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:13 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Hills4x4#1 wrote:
Red89 wrote:
Tc gears work for both on and offroad.

Ohhh how so ?

Drive goes through the transfer regardless of whether you are in 2wd or 4wd so any gear changes will affect both.

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm
Posts: 5517
Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!

Post Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:47 am 
Reply with quote Top  
Just read a bit more mate. Here's the chart off lowrange. I assume you know the meaning of high range reduction.

Gear Set --------- 4.16:1| 4.9:1| 5.14:1| 6.4:1| 6.5:1|
Low Range Reduction-- 84% | 115%| 127%| 181%| 187%|
High Range Reduction-- 12% | 16%| 18.3%| 17%| 20%|

Lets say you changed diff gears to the most popular ones around over your stock 3.7's

Gear Set----------- 3.9:1| 5.12:1|
Low Range Reduction-- ~5% | ~38%|
High Range Reduction-- ~5% | ~38%|

Obviously that results in the same high and low range reduction. If you wanted to make a significant change then you would put in 5.12 diff gears. So comparing this to the lowest transfercase reduction gear set (4.16:1) your high range reduction is huge and you will probs be revving around the 4500RPM+ at 100kph in 5th. Where as the low range reduction is not even half as good as the smallest transfercase reduction gear set.

So with those diff gears you would end up with too much reduction on road and too little reduction offroad, the worst of both worlds...

 Profile  

Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:49 pm
Posts: 161
Location: Parkside
Vehicle: Suzuki/Sierra/1988 SJ50 HiTop

Post Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:41 pm 
Reply with quote Top  
Hills4x4#1 wrote:
You fitted that to a g13a?


Yep

 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 

Jump to:  


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 611 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Untitled Document


Untitled Document


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group :: Style based on FI Subice by phpBBservice.nl :: All times are UTC + 9:30 hours