| Author |
Message |
DS-ZOOK
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 5:51 pm Posts: 53
Vehicle: 1999 Jimny
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2015 6:03 am |
|
|
I have been doing some research but I'm struggling to conclude wether it is worth putting a 1.0L transfer case into my Jimny
wanting the ability to run 32s or 33s.. would it be enough to just put in the 1.0l transfer or just spend the extra and build a rocklobster? Cant find much information on people just straight swapping the 1.0l transfer
cheers
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2015 6:39 am |
|
|
I've done a bit of research, and I'd say no, both options aren't sufficient for your planned tyre size.
If I'm correct, your current transfer ratios are: 1.32:1 high range and 2.145 low. 1.0 transfer case is 1.58 high and 2.55 low. Rock lobster is 1.68 high and 4.1(?) low
That makes high range about 15% lower than your current setup. Your planned tyres are at least 23% bigger than standard, therefore you'll be revving 8% lower for the same road speed, ar about 350rpm lower at cruise. That's a fair bit and will hurt fuel economy and cause you to be downshifting frequently.
Off road, you might get away with 4.1ish reduction, but in reality you'd be far happier with reduction in the 6.5 range.
Go straight to a 1.3 transfer and 6.4/6.5 gears IMHO.
|
|
|
|
 |
MrRocky
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 4731 Location: perth
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2015 6:58 am |
|
|
Apparently the auto jimny cases are a fair bit lower
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2015 7:09 am |
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14498 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2015 4:57 pm |
|
|
He has the wrong model jimny to benefit from a auto transfer
_________________ JEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEP
|
|
|
|
 |
JuniorJoel
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:52 pm Posts: 198
Vehicle: 2000 model Suzuki Jimny
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:02 pm |
|
If your planning on running 33's I can speak from experience and say Sierra case with 6.5's is going to be the way to go. Highway is great and low is awesome  there is no point messing around with alternatives for tyres that size on a Jimny. Also take into consideration breakages driveline wise it's better just to do the Sierra case and gears and call it done.
|
|
|
|
 |
Mike57

az supporter
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:09 am Posts: 1009 Location: Melbourne
Vehicle: Suzuki Jimny 2009
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2015 7:38 pm |
|
|
And then be prepared to upgrade the axles and CVs as the next step?
|
|
|
|
 |
JuniorJoel
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:52 pm Posts: 198
Vehicle: 2000 model Suzuki Jimny
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2015 5:24 am |
|
Upgrading axles and CV's I wouldn't even consider as a step. More a necessity that's is done in conjunction with the gearing to make a Jimny which you can take off-road 
|
|
|
|
 |
DS-ZOOK
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 5:51 pm Posts: 53
Vehicle: 1999 Jimny
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 5:18 pm |
|
|
Thanks for all the help im not too worried about the on road speeds and that because I will be soon putting a much more powerful engine in and converting my diffs to hilux diffs so I do have the strength to run 33s without any damage
I just want a slower crawl speed because like every other jimny owner I dont enjoy my Low 1 being everyone else's low 3 haha
|
|
|
|
 |
DS-ZOOK
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 5:51 pm Posts: 53
Vehicle: 1999 Jimny
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 5:33 pm |
|
Gwagensteve wrote: Go straight to a 1.3 transfer and 6.4/6.5 gears IMHO. Does the WT/NT make any difference? cheers
|
|
|
|
 |
Reubs
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1522 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: SJ80, SE416
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 6:46 pm |
|
DS-ZOOK wrote: Thanks for all the help im not too worried about the on road speeds and that because I will be soon putting a much more powerful engine in and converting my diffs to hilux diffs so I do have the strength to run 33s without any damage
I just want a slower crawl speed because like every other jimny owner I dont enjoy my Low 1 being everyone else's low 3 haha Same advice as above. You don't need Hilux diffs - I know of plenty of Zuks on 33s which generally have pretty reliable drivelines and are still on Suzuki diffs.
|
|
|
|
 |
JuniorJoel
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:52 pm Posts: 198
Vehicle: 2000 model Suzuki Jimny
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 7:50 pm |
|
|
You'll need a WT Sierra case.
Speaking from experience my 1st low is plenty low, equivalent to that of a sierra.
I personally don't see the need for "a much more powerful engine" your going to be gearing your car to suit the desired tyres. All that a "a much more powerful engine" will do is put unnecessary strain on things. Especially If your not concerned about on road speeds, 6.5's with your 4.09 diffs (99 Jimny) is fine. I DD my jimny with that combo and it couldn't get much better for 33's.
Just take a look at other peoples builds and take note on what they say. It'll save you a lot of hassle if you know exactly what your trying to achieve before you go throwing hilux diffs with 33's under a jimny.
|
|
|
|
 |
sideways

az supporter
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:53 pm Posts: 5935 Location: Northcliffe, W.A.
Vehicle: LJs, Sierra, Jimny, Swift.
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 7:55 am |
|
|
Rock lobster is 1.58 high, 4.16 low.
32" tyres have 21.7% greater circumference, 33s are 25.4%.
A 1l transfer/rocklobster/4.16 (1.58 high) is 19.69% lower than what you have. 4.9s (1.628 high) are 23.41% lower. 6.5s are 28.18% lower.
Pre vvt jimny auto transfers are the same ratio as manuals.
You can use either NT or WT transfer, you can even use a switch case 1l transfer if you run 6.5s. WT is easiest as it already comes with the right flanges.
If you're driving terrain that you need 32-33" tyres for you'll certainly want far lower gearing than a 1l transfer.
Hilux diffs have the rear pumpkin centred so you can't run them in a Jimny. You need a Bundera rear diff but they're quite hard to get. You could run an MQ/MK diff which is about the same width. The Suzuki diff is likely strong enough anyway, depends on your driving.
|
|
|
|
 |
MrRocky
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 4731 Location: perth
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 11:01 am |
|
|
Also consider the early jim 4.1 crownwheel and pinion are made of cheese Seem alot weaker cast than sierra center of same ratio
|
|
|
|
 |
DS-ZOOK
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 5:51 pm Posts: 53
Vehicle: 1999 Jimny
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 2:57 pm |
|
|
Sorry, I'm just here to find out about the question i asked.
I know the jimny diffs will take it but the hilux diffs will take it better, not to mention they have a 70mm wider track and they also are compatible with more locker brands, compatible with elockers too. the bigger engine is for more power overall, im happy with the current offroad performance but that doesnt stop me from wanting to have more power why wouldnt I want a turbo diesel jimny...
Thank you for your opinions though but I would just rather hear responses on the question I asked, thank you for those who have helped, I have decided I will be buying a WT 1.3L transfer case and putting 6.5:1 gears in it
Cheers
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:12 pm |
|
|
If you want a turbodiesel jimny you need a hilux.
|
|
|
|
 |
DS-ZOOK
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 5:51 pm Posts: 53
Vehicle: 1999 Jimny
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 5:17 pm |
|
|
Or just a turbo diesel jimny like I'm going to as I have no interest in a car in which every second person has But why not make the jimny which is so original into something better and doing some original modifications to it like I will be
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 7:04 pm |
|
|
Because all up, it won't be better. Adding weight to a Suzuki never, ever makes them better.
|
|
|
|
 |
Reubs
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1522 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: SJ80, SE416
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 8:14 pm |
|
|
I would like to see a turbo diesel Jimmy/Sierra/LJ...
...plenty of people say they will build one yet none seem to get built!
|
|
|
|
 |
vet 180
Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 11:50 am Posts: 1246
Vehicle: Vitara 1994
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 10:41 pm |
|
|
There is a pretty nice one over on PF
|
|
|
|
 |
DS-ZOOK
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 5:51 pm Posts: 53
Vehicle: 1999 Jimny
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 1:56 pm |
|
Reubs wrote: I would like to see a turbo diesel Jimmy/Sierra/LJ...
...plenty of people say they will build one yet none seem to get built! Your attitude is much better than Steves, a little bit of encouragement rather than trying to shut down someones idea... these forums need more people like you Now Steve, a little bit more weight cant hurt too much when you're putting an engine in that is 92% bigger than the original 1.3, im sure a little zook could take it. They're not as fragile as you think
|
|
|
|
 |
Zook_Fan

az supporter
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 4530 Location: Toowoomba
Vehicle: Maruti and LJ80's
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:07 pm |
|
Steve might come across that way but he raised the one point that encompasses why this is a bad idea, weight. It doesn't matter what the output of the new engine is you will have an unbalanced car that does not handle well. The "little zook" can take it, once you take out the transmission, transfer and diffs essentially leaving you with a hilux that looks like a Jimny. However once it is that abortion a crazy amount of weight will be over the front axle and next to nothing over the rear. You'll need very stiff spring rate in the front to overcome the weight compared to low in the rear, off-road the rear will just fall all over the place while the front hardly moves. On road you'll have a sluggish jimny that is crazy expensive and won't ride right due to the uneven weight distribution. But really, go ahead and do it. Just do it forewarned 
|
|
|
|
 |
Marko_SJ
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:40 am Posts: 2979 Location: Darwin, NT
Vehicle: WT sierra, GU CRD
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:14 pm |
|
|
I'm having trouble fathoming how a diesel is even any good for this purpose or what the imagined upsides are? What diesel does the OP want to use?
Cheap? no
Power? not really
sound? 4 cylinder diesels sound terrible
fuel economy? What 4wd uses less fuel than a jimny once big tires are added... none
_________________ I love ZD30. :)
|
|
|
|
 |
31zook
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 9242 Location: maito
Vehicle: <3 Edna <3
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 3:11 pm |
|
sideways wrote: Rock lobster is 1.58 high, 4.16 low.
32" tyres have 21.7% greater circumference, 33s are 25.4%.
A 1l transfer/rocklobster/4.16 (1.58 high) is 19.69% lower than what you have. 4.9s (1.628 high) are 23.41% lower. 6.5s are 28.18% lower.
Pre vvt jimny auto transfers are the same ratio as manuals.
You can use either NT or WT transfer, you can even use a switch case 1l transfer if you run 6.5s. WT is easiest as it already comes with the right flanges.
If you're driving terrain that you need 32-33" tyres for you'll certainly want far lower gearing than a 1l transfer.
Hilux diffs have the rear pumpkin centred so you can't run them in a Jimny. You need a Bundera rear diff but they're quite hard to get. You could run an MQ/MK diff which is about the same width. The Suzuki diff is likely strong enough anyway, depends on your driving. You have a special rocklobster. Used it yet?
|
|
|
|
 |
vet 180
Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 11:50 am Posts: 1246
Vehicle: Vitara 1994
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:53 pm |
|
|
If I was going to diesel a zook, it would be a LWB sierra
|
|
|
|
 |
DS-ZOOK
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 5:51 pm Posts: 53
Vehicle: 1999 Jimny
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:08 pm |
|
|
bringing back this old post, I somehow came across a set of 5 31'' Simex extreme trekkers on 15x8 wheels for $450 and I just couldnt say no
I just got together the money to do the reduced gearing but now I'm thinking 6.5:1 will be too much for the 31's Im now looking at 4.9:1 gears just wondering how people rate these. Does this virtually restore it to stock gearing just with bigger wheels or do these actually give you a true "crawl" like 6.5s would
cheers
|
|
|
|
 |
J--A--C--K
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:48 am Posts: 253 Location: melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:16 pm |
|
|
Given there 4.9 to 1 as opposed to the 2.15 you currently have yes they will make a big difference, it's over 100% lower. But maybe not what some people would Callum's true crawl. I run them in a Sierra with 30's and think there perfect.
|
|
|
|
 |
tanshi

az supporter
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 7717 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:24 pm |
|
|
|
 |
DS-ZOOK
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 5:51 pm Posts: 53
Vehicle: 1999 Jimny
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 7:28 am |
|
|
|
 |
DS-ZOOK
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 5:51 pm Posts: 53
Vehicle: 1999 Jimny
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2016 5:07 am |
|
|
Has anyone got 6.5:1 gears in running 31s? Does it become way too much?
|
|
|
|
 |
|