| Author |
Message |
Pooke
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:03 pm Posts: 66 Location: New Zealand
Vehicle: 95 SJ70, 96 Escudo v6
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 6:37 pm |
|
|
Vehicle in question is a 96 Vitara V6 (SV620)
Has anyone taken the viscous fan off and installed an electric? did you use a fan controller or is there a factory wire somewhere I can use as a trigger?
|
|
|
|
 |
J--A--C--K
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:48 am Posts: 253 Location: melbourne
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 6:41 pm |
|
|
Why remove the factory fan?
|
|
|
|
 |
Pooke
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:03 pm Posts: 66 Location: New Zealand
Vehicle: 95 SJ70, 96 Escudo v6
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 6:43 pm |
|
|
I knew someone was going to ask that... the viscous clutch is not working as well as it should/I hate the noise it makes/ ever so slightly less drag on the engin
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 6:58 pm |
|
|
Go right ahead. A less effective, more complex, "suck it and see" solution must be better than the cooling system as Suzuki designed it.
|
|
|
|
 |
Pooke
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:03 pm Posts: 66 Location: New Zealand
Vehicle: 95 SJ70, 96 Escudo v6
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 7:18 pm |
|
Gwagensteve wrote: Go right ahead. A less effective, more complex, "suck it and see" solution must be better than the cooling system as Suzuki designed it. Less effective, not if done correctly. More complex, prehaps. But hey with that attitude why modify anything on our vehicles and leave them completely as they were designed.
|
|
|
|
 |
henno

I live here!
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:56 pm Posts: 2439 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: Which one?
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 7:24 pm |
|
Pooke wrote: with that attitude why modify anything on our vehicles and leave them completely as they were designed. To improve them. What are you improving by replacing the viscous fan with an electric one?
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 7:32 pm |
|
|
I modify things that need improvement due to my changed parameters of use. I won't remove a simple and effective system and replace it with a more complex and less reliable solution when there are few if any tangible gains. Even so, it's often lots of work and lots of trial and error modifying things that DO require it, and in the case of the cooling system, failure might result in a dead motor.
Lots of people modify things that don't do anything to improve the car, in the interest of fiddling with something.
Good luck.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
got_bar_work
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 8:30 pm Posts: 2214 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: SQ625
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 11:04 am |
|
|
It probably just needs some extra jelly in it. Y spend hours and hundreds of dollars instead of a $20 fix
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 11:33 am |
|
|
Because modifying things for the sake of it when the outcome is likely to be worse than standard is apparently cool.
|
|
|
|
 |
got_bar_work
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 8:30 pm Posts: 2214 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: SQ625
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 1:33 pm |
|
|
Any thermo fan that moves any where close to the volume of air that the stock fan moves is going to be way louder
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 1:38 pm |
|
|
I was reading the specs on the current Camaro cooling fan. That consumes 850 watts. That's probably 4hp at the crank.
It fascinates me that apparently mechanical fans sap all this power compared to thermos- where do these people think the power comes from to run the thermo fan? The same crank.... Just in a less efficient way.
|
|
|
|
 |
|