| Author |
Message |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:25 am |
|
|
am i correct in assuming that i can run my gti head on a vit bottom end???
just thinking as i want to build a new motor soon.... a bit more power never hurt! and i dont want to go the whole vit motor as it is wired for gti etc...
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
Ben_Sierra

az supporter
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4472 Location: Perth
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:50 am |
|
|
I expect it would, to a degree, however how the GTI ECU would go with the extra capacity I'm not sure...
It may underfuel and run lean, and I'm not sure what it would be like in terms of compression compared to the GTI setup...
I'm sure someone here will have a better idea though...
_________________ I want my old sig back 
|
|
|
|
 |
31zook
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 9242 Location: maito
Vehicle: <3 Edna <3
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:55 am |
|
can be done, look on redlinegti.com, lotsa conversions like this, it's the motor setup that i will build next 
|
|
|
|
 |
mnemonix

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1409 Location: Newcastle NSW
Vehicle: '96 LWB trayback
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 11:25 am |
|
It's the engine I have in my current zook.
Piss poor really. Not worth the effort.
My last zook had a standard G16b in a swb, it was awesome by comparison.
Now I have g16b + mk1 gti head. aftermarket ecu, extractors, 2" exhaust, enlarged mk3 inlet manifold, 60mm throttle body, sr20 CAS with twin coils running sequential ignition, with a solid fuel system.
Would be a decent engine in a swift, but the combo is total unsuited to offroad work.
The power output is barely above a g16b if you compare dyno results, but the G16b has a better torque curve. I've seen rebuilt g13a engines that make more at the wheels than I do, and my car has had ~30 hours dyno time.
The GTI head doesn't flow sufficient air to make decent power without going to the effort (and expense) of head work. Porting, cam and valve job at a minimum.
Mk2/3 are slightly better in this regard, but still much less flow in standard form than a stock 16v sohc head.
I made decent power when I had the sc14 fitted, but then reliability comes into question.
It usually seems to fall on deaf ears when I offer advice on this topic.
So much of the information on redline/teamswift are from people who have not used the combo, or who go all out with headwork when they build it.
The stock head/block runs, but is not a performance upgrade. It's just an uneccesary complication of an otherwise proven package.
If you're sticking to a suzuki G series engine, go with the standard G16b.
If you follow any build that uses this engine long term, they generally die from underfueling at higher revs.
On top of this, they overfuel on decel and low load, causing worse fuel economy.
- Less fuel economy, no more power, less reliability and a hand grenade waiting to go off. Sounds like a winner to me! 
|
|
|
|
 |
wasfishing
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 4 Location: Darwin
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:41 pm |
|
|
do u happen to know the part number for the mazda dizzy cap used in the gti conversion
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:30 pm |
|
mnemonix wrote: - Less fuel economy, no more power, less reliability and a hand grenade waiting to go off. Sounds like a winner to me! 
thanks mate! was just a idea.. i love the durability of the gti motor in mine but wouldn't mind a bit more toque
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
mnemonix

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1409 Location: Newcastle NSW
Vehicle: '96 LWB trayback
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:35 pm |
|
|
I use a right angle adaptor on mine as it's a SA (mk1).
mk2/3 can use a '86-'89 mazda 323 GT 1.6l Turbo dizzy cap and rotor.
Don't stress about the part number as it isn't standard between manufacturers (several aftermarket suppliers make caps for this vehicle).
Ask for it by model.
Get it from Repco or similar.
_________________ Twin charged twin cam twin locked webwheeler
|
|
|
|
 |
v.w.dave
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1437 Location: The Hills Sydney
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 6:59 pm |
|
|
i did a lot of reading into this and talked to a few that had it and they all say the same thing not worth the hassel and will never run right. They all say stick to the single cam head.
_________________ Snap-On Dealer let me know if you need anything.
|
|
|
|
 |
Highway-Star
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4109 Location: Ipswich
Vehicle: LJ80V-II (a proper Stockman)
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 7:42 pm |
|
jonno_racing wrote: mnemonix wrote: - Less fuel economy, no more power, less reliability and a hand grenade waiting to go off. Sounds like a winner to me!  thanks mate! was just a idea.. i love the durability of the gti motor in mine but wouldn't mind a bit more toque
Lower gearing
_________________ Clearance Hole Technology 
|
|
|
|
 |
Ben_Sierra

az supporter
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4472 Location: Perth
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:20 pm |
|
jonno_racing wrote: mnemonix wrote: - Less fuel economy, no more power, less reliability and a hand grenade waiting to go off. Sounds like a winner to me!  thanks mate! was just a idea.. i love the durability of the gti motor in mine but wouldn't mind a bit more toque
Maybe you should go re-read the last few weeks of your build thread, cos overheating, leaky sumps and fucked big-ends doesn't sound that durable to me...
_________________ I want my old sig back 
|
|
|
|
 |
flaxton123
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 121 Location: queensland
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 10:23 pm |
|
|
my mate did this conversion in his hard top it runs great with an after market ecu but not much more power than the 1.6 but one thing it does have is an awsome sound compared to to the 1.6 it sounds amazing but probly not worth the trouble unless u do alotof other things like cams and ajustable cam gears because the timing isnt quite perfect with the belt the fits it would be kool if u want a different engine for no other reason than u wanna be different
|
|
|
|
 |
mnemonix

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1409 Location: Newcastle NSW
Vehicle: '96 LWB trayback
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 10:27 pm |
|
flaxton123 wrote: my mate did this conversion in his hard top it runs great with an after market ecu but not much more power than the 1.6 but one thing it does have is an awsome sound compared to to the 1.6 it sounds amazing but probly not worth the trouble unless u do alotof other things like cams and ajustable cam gears because the timing isnt quite perfect with the belt the fits it would be kool if u want a different engine for no other reason than u wanna be different
Spend a few grand on conversion, aftermarket ecu and tuning for a cool sound and for something different.
You're right about the timing being slightly off. If set to the factory timing marks it will be retarded.
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34842 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:03 am |
|
|
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 4:27 pm |
|
atari4x4 wrote:
was ment to say drivability...
i think so much of mine is related to luck... its feeling better now tho
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
eldo

az supporter
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2770 Location: sunny coast
Vehicle: jimny
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:46 pm |
|
|
luck!!!! jonno i reckon its related to your right foot, yep ive seen all the vids you posted, if in doubt give it some more berries!!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:52 pm |
|
|
posibly mate, but they are a motor that is built to be reved lol... its all good!
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
|