| Author |
Message |
scottyy
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:08 am Posts: 2 Location: gold coast
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:52 am |
|
|
Hey guys just bought some hilux diffs for my '95 sierra.
Just wondering if you have any tips for the conversion.
And what to do with the offset for the rear diff.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
 |
zooky08

az supporter
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 3426 Location: imbil/gympie. qld
Vehicle: 03 Jimny
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:06 am |
|
|
Dont think u can get hilux diffs engineered on a sierra in qld
_________________ 03 Jimny 30 km2s 75mm lift f&r locked winch
|
|
|
|
 |
zookernator
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 813 Location: Tasmania
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:39 am |
|
|
_________________ F&R ARB air lockers, lux diffs, 4 link coil rear,
|
|
|
|
 |
4wheeljive

az supporter
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 315 Location: Ballina
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:28 pm |
|
|
you cant unless you do it spring under
|
|
|
|
 |
weaves

az supporter
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 1564 Location: Newcastle
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:48 pm |
|
scottyy wrote: Hey guys just bought some hilux diffs for my '95 sierra. Just wondering if you have any tips for the conversion. And what to do with the offset for the rear diff. Cheers
Assuming your not after a legal truck.
Your spring perch's will pretty much fit the WT spacing, from what i have read its just a case of 'manipulating' them into place.
then you need to look at steering, high steer, cross over setups can be bought through lowrance etc, you will need this as the hilux runs a J arm setup from factory. Some people have flipped and welded another left hand (i think) steering arm on top of the passenger side, using the standard tie rod, and manufacturing a drag link.
as for the rear offset, if this is a trailered rig that will more than likely never be out of low range, it won't caust you too much drama, at any decent speed it will more than lickely vrbrate like mad. If your worried about this you can source a Bundy diff which is offset.
weaves
_________________ I'm Weaver & i like beer, boobs, cars and stickers
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:24 pm |
|
weaves wrote: Your spring perch's will pretty much fit the WT spacing
Pretty much fit eh?
They either fit or they don't. And in this case, they don't.
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
BUZOOKA

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 2659 Location: hobart tasmania
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 12:07 am |
|
|
i dont see the point in ruining one of the sierras key strengths by making it as wide as every other 4wd on the market ...
just my 2 cents .. but hey ur bus go for it
_________________ -indebt 4x4 club-
nav 32s n winch cust rear
|
|
|
|
 |
scottyy
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:08 am Posts: 2 Location: gold coast
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 12:15 am |
|
|
thanks guys what the chances of finding a bundera diff for the rear because ill be on road
|
|
|
|
 |
weaves

az supporter
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 1564 Location: Newcastle
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:09 am |
|
Damo wrote: weaves wrote: Your spring perch's will pretty much fit the WT spacing Pretty much fit eh? They either fit or they don't. And in this case, they don't.
Yep i stand by my statement, from what i understand its about 1 cm out
_________________ I'm Weaver & i like beer, boobs, cars and stickers
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 9:15 am |
|
BUZOOKA wrote: i dont see the point in ruining one of the sierras key strengths by making it as wide as every other 4wd on the market ...
just my 2 cents .. but hey ur bus go for it
Are you suggesting that giving a vehicle a wider stance is a bad thing?
If so I think you need to re-visit 4WDing 101.
The key advantages of the sierra are not its narrow track, but its light weight, manuverability and general mechanical reliabilty.
Wide and low. Can't go wrong.
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:43 pm |
|
weaves wrote: Damo wrote: weaves wrote: Your spring perch's will pretty much fit the WT spacing Pretty much fit eh? They either fit or they don't. And in this case, they don't. Yep i stand by my statement, from what i understand its about 1 cm out
Fair enough, we'll agree to disagree.
Bundy diff won't be as common as hilux, but you can find them if you look.
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
Highway-Star
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4109 Location: Ipswich
Vehicle: LJ80V-II (a proper Stockman)
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 1:49 am |
|
Fatzook wrote: BUZOOKA wrote: i dont see the point in ruining one of the sierras key strengths by making it as wide as every other 4wd on the market ...
just my 2 cents .. but hey ur bus go for it Are you suggesting that giving a vehicle a wider stance is a bad thing? If so I think you need to re-visit 4WDing 101. The key advantages of the sierra are not its narrow track, but its light weight, manuverability and general mechanical reliabilty. Wide and low. Can't go wrong.
I hate to say this.....but I'm agreeing with buzooka  .
I prefer the Narrow track of my LJ over the Sierra. I feel WT Sierras are too wide and cumbersome to begin with. High risk for high gain, love the narrowness 
_________________ Clearance Hole Technology 
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 1:57 am |
|
Highway-Star wrote: Fatzook wrote: BUZOOKA wrote: i dont see the point in ruining one of the sierras key strengths by making it as wide as every other 4wd on the market ...
just my 2 cents .. but hey ur bus go for it Are you suggesting that giving a vehicle a wider stance is a bad thing? If so I think you need to re-visit 4WDing 101. The key advantages of the sierra are not its narrow track, but its light weight, manuverability and general mechanical reliabilty. Wide and low. Can't go wrong. I hate to say this.....but I'm agreeing with buzooka  . I prefer the Narrow track of my LJ over the Sierra. I feel WT Sierras are too wide and cumbersome to begin with. High risk for high gain, love the narrowness 
You trade stability for agility. Depending on where you're wheeling and how you drive one or the other might be an advantage. It's the same old story, no such thing as a free lunch and each to their own.
Personally I like the low & wide type setup.
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34842 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:00 am |
|
|
|
 |
Highway-Star
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4109 Location: Ipswich
Vehicle: LJ80V-II (a proper Stockman)
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:05 am |
|
Damo wrote: Highway-Star wrote: Fatzook wrote: BUZOOKA wrote: i dont see the point in ruining one of the sierras key strengths by making it as wide as every other 4wd on the market ...
just my 2 cents .. but hey ur bus go for it Are you suggesting that giving a vehicle a wider stance is a bad thing? If so I think you need to re-visit 4WDing 101. The key advantages of the sierra are not its narrow track, but its light weight, manuverability and general mechanical reliabilty. Wide and low. Can't go wrong. I hate to say this.....but I'm agreeing with buzooka  . I prefer the Narrow track of my LJ over the Sierra. I feel WT Sierras are too wide and cumbersome to begin with. High risk for high gain, love the narrowness  You trade stability for agility. Depending on where you're wheeling and how you drive one or the other might be an advantage. It's the same old story, no such thing as a free lunch and each to their own. Personally I like the low & wide type setup.
For sure. Thats why I said I prefer. Not wide is crap...
I prefer all dimensions small, narrow, low and short. Guess thats why I love the LJ80 so much
The LJ80 is probably a tad on the too short side...  though the unpredictablity on steep hills adds to the fun 
_________________ Clearance Hole Technology 
|
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14498 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:05 am |
|
what is the difference between a bundera diff and a 75series diff.
i always thought that a bundera was just a swb 75. 
_________________ JEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEP
|
|
|
|
 |
Joe

I live here!
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 49041 Location: Rockingham W.A
Vehicle: JB74
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:07 am |
|
shep wrote: what is the difference between a bundera diff and a 75series diff. i always thought that a bundera was just a swb 75. 
I think it's the offset of the pumpkin 
_________________ Joe likes boobs ( . )( . ) ( ° )( ° )
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:10 am |
|
Highway-Star wrote: Damo wrote: Highway-Star wrote: Fatzook wrote: BUZOOKA wrote: i dont see the point in ruining one of the sierras key strengths by making it as wide as every other 4wd on the market ...
just my 2 cents .. but hey ur bus go for it Are you suggesting that giving a vehicle a wider stance is a bad thing? If so I think you need to re-visit 4WDing 101. The key advantages of the sierra are not its narrow track, but its light weight, manuverability and general mechanical reliabilty. Wide and low. Can't go wrong. I hate to say this.....but I'm agreeing with buzooka  . I prefer the Narrow track of my LJ over the Sierra. I feel WT Sierras are too wide and cumbersome to begin with. High risk for high gain, love the narrowness  You trade stability for agility. Depending on where you're wheeling and how you drive one or the other might be an advantage. It's the same old story, no such thing as a free lunch and each to their own. Personally I like the low & wide type setup. For sure. Thats why I said I prefer. Not wide is crap... I prefer all dimensions small, narrow, low and short. Guess thats why I love the LJ80 so much The LJ80 is probably a tad on the too short side...  though the unpredictablity on steep hills adds to the fun 
Critically you're making a point that along with the narrow track, you have lower overall weight, lower CoG. That means the vehicle is in proportion which is probably the most important thing.
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
Highway-Star
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4109 Location: Ipswich
Vehicle: LJ80V-II (a proper Stockman)
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:12 am |
|
Joe wrote: shep wrote: what is the difference between a bundera diff and a 75series diff. i always thought that a bundera was just a swb 75.  I think it's the offset of the pumpkin 
Bundera is a "baby" 70 series. The true short wheel base (eg BJ70, Bundera would be RJ70 or LJ70) still runs leaf springs and full size 9" Cruiser centres with full floating rear shafts. The Bundera is a barstardisation of Land Cruiser and Hilux, with smaller 8" centres and semi floating rear shafts.
For all intensive purposes the Cruiser diffs are "superior", however they are heavier and will lose you diff clearance with the 9" centres. Hence , the Bundera is probably better for a Suzuki, as the extra strength of the big diffs would be mostly wasted.
_________________ Clearance Hole Technology 
|
|
|
|
 |
shep
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14498 Location: Here there everywhere
Vehicle: A manly awesome man jimny
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:14 am |
|
Highway-Star wrote: Joe wrote: shep wrote: what is the difference between a bundera diff and a 75series diff. i always thought that a bundera was just a swb 75.  I think it's the offset of the pumpkin  Bundera is a "baby" 70 series. The true short wheel base (eg BJ70, Bundera would be RJ70 or LJ70) still runs leaf springs and full size 9" Cruiser centres with full floating rear shafts. The Bundera is a barstardisation of Land Cruiser and Hilux, with smaller 8" centres and semi floating rear shafts. For all intensive purposes the Cruiser diffs are "superior", however they are heavier and will lose you diff clearance with the 9" centres. Hence , the Bundera is probably better for a Suzuki, as the extra strength of the big diffs would be mostly wasted.
i should measure the diff clearance one day as my 75 seems to have almost as much as my sierra.
_________________ JEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEPJEEP
|
|
|
|
 |
Highway-Star
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4109 Location: Ipswich
Vehicle: LJ80V-II (a proper Stockman)
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:18 am |
|
Damo wrote: Highway-Star wrote: For sure. Thats why I said I prefer. Not wide is crap... I prefer all dimensions small, narrow, low and short. Guess thats why I love the LJ80 so much The LJ80 is probably a tad on the too short side...  though the unpredictablity on steep hills adds to the fun  Critically you're making a point that along with the narrow track, you have lower overall weight, lower CoG. That means the vehicle is in proportion which is probably the most important thing.
I'd say worse COG. LJ80's have the engine in a terrible position. Its very high, and very far forward (The car does feel nose heavy compared to a Sierra). LJ's are supposed to have 2 cylinder 2 strokes in them, the 50 and the 80 were official bodge jobs by Suzuki.... But I still love them
On a related note, I would never own a modified Sierra with NT diffs. I would be WT, but just more inset wheels; the end result would still be what I value in a vehicle. Its plausible the same is achievable with Toyota diffs, I'm just not sure how inset you can go?
_________________ Clearance Hole Technology 
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34842 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:47 am |
|
Joe wrote: shep wrote: what is the difference between a bundera diff and a 75series diff. i always thought that a bundera was just a swb 75.  I think it's the offset of the pumpkin 
+ coil springs & radius arm suspension.
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
BlueSuzy

az supporter
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 9716 Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 3:24 am |
|
|
A landcruiser "bundera" is a swb 75' coilsprung. All is hilux sizing with diffs. But slight differences only.
A swb Landcruiser is a leaf one. Bigger centres, fully floating rear. Axles and cv's meant to be same thickness as lux/40/etc
_________________ BlueSuzy wrote: I'm over the G16b's.
|
|
|
|
 |
2stroker
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 2689 Location: North Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:50 am |
|
|
Actually a Bundera is not really a swb 70 series, although they look similar the front panels are different, they run smaller hilux diff centres but unlike hilux which are offset front and centred rear they are offset in the rear, they only come in 4 cyl 22r or 3b 4 cyl diesel and they are coil sprung. The swb 70 series are leaf sprung come in 6 cyl petrol and 6cyl and 4cyl diesel and are not called Bundera's
|
|
|
|
 |
zookernator
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 813 Location: Tasmania
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:34 am |
|
|
x2 with the low and wide opinion.. its not always about dropping into the wheel ruts, perhaps one should learn to steer clear of them if they are that bloody deep!!!
_________________ F&R ARB air lockers, lux diffs, 4 link coil rear,
|
|
|
|
 |
appsie
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 2225
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 9:03 am |
|
|
i pulled a coiled bundy diff out of one with a 2L T which is now under a fellow members truck getting built
scotty,what are your plans for regoing then if your in qld and running springover?
also i say a bit of width cant hurt at all,making it more stable but i also agree that what these things can do in stupid tight gullys is also a big advantage
|
|
|
|
 |
BlueSuzy

az supporter
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 9716 Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 10:18 am |
|
my swb wt has 15x8-28 rims on suz diffs.
With my new lux diffs and new 15x8-19 rims, its only going to be 15mm wider a side..In theory... 
_________________ BlueSuzy wrote: I'm over the G16b's.
|
|
|
|
 |
mcwilly
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 867 Location: nsw, newcastle
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:05 am |
|
|
I agree with weaver I know of a zoom on luxs with unmodified spring perches
_________________ 1996 sierra + 2" body lift + SPOA conversion + ome
|
|
|
|
 |
|