| Author |
Message |
stockman

az supporter
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 5319 Location: Canberra
Vehicle: 4wd
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:17 am |
|
|
I'm going to order some tyres for the Choker and thought I'd ask for some recomendations.
Mainly will be driven on Dirt/Mud both dry and wet, with a little rock.
In 34 or 35.
Going to use my king 15 x 8 rims.
What tyre and how wide?
_________________ Watch out or you'll get sued.
|
|
|
|
 |
SierraDan

az supporter
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:55 pm Posts: 9348 Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: G13BB Jimny
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:22 am |
|
Bighorns 35x12.5R15 
_________________ mlm
|
|
|
|
 |
Scrawny

I live here!
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 10528 Location: Brissie
Vehicle: Popemobile
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:30 am |
|
|
Why not keep them not keep them narrow?
|
|
|
|
 |
stockman

az supporter
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 5319 Location: Canberra
Vehicle: 4wd
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:38 am |
|
|
Whats the narrowest available?
_________________ Watch out or you'll get sued.
|
|
|
|
 |
dominator
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 97 Location: Noosa QLD
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:50 am |
|
|
Jungle trekkers come out in a 34 x 11.5, or extreme trekkers come in a 35 x 11.5, that's if you wanna go skinny. If I had the money to get new tires I would get maxxis creepy crawlers, 35x13.5 or mudzillas/bias claws.
_________________ Sierra, Ute Chop, Tube Tray, 1.6 EFI, locked F&R,
|
|
|
|
 |
Ridge
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 942 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: sierra leaf sprung buggy
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:45 am |
|
|
|
 |
|
suzooky87
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:19 am |
|
|
Please excuse my ignorance. But, why would you want skinny?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
suzooky87
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:19 am |
|
|
Please excuse my ignorance. But, why would you want skinny?
|
|
|
|
 |
mnemonix

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1409 Location: Newcastle NSW
Vehicle: '96 LWB trayback
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:33 am |
|
|
The smaller contact patch of a skinny tyre provides more downforce/weight, therefore more chance of traction.
_________________ Twin charged twin cam twin locked webwheeler
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:35 am |
|
|
more ground pressure... imagine a tank track... theyre long but skinny, and tanks go everywhere =) taller tyres make a longer footprint when aired down.
theres also the advantage of not fitting in the bigger 4x4's tracks with narrower tyres, so yu can often get more bite that way too.
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:43 am |
|
|
The end result is that narrow tyres bite harder and are more responsive to steering on slippery surfaces.
The disadvantage is less overall width can result in the car liking to take little naps. If you punch the width out with offset/spacers to make it stable, you fall into everyone else's ruts.
All things being equal, narrow tyres drive better. Throw in huge ruts though, and sometimes the widest tyre you can run is the answer, even if it doesn't work as well when there are no ruts to sit in.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
BlueSuzy

az supporter
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 9716 Location: NSW
Vehicle: SJ51 LWB, SJ70 SWB
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:44 am |
|
|
This is why prams have thin tyres also.
ALot of brands 35" are actually 34 or less, so be aware of that or ask before you buy.
My 35" km2's are real size.
My 33" nankangs were way undersize
_________________ BlueSuzy wrote: I'm over the G16b's.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
suzooky87
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:12 am |
|
|
awesome, good to know guys. i always thought wider was better but now i understand the formula.
|
|
|
|
 |
|