| Author |
Message |
Jackson
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:56 am Posts: 559 Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: Yellow Ute
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 6:23 am |
|
|
G'day fellas.
Have heard around the traps that webers are not very good on hills. My zook has a 4k motor so it has a 4k carby but anyone that has one will know that the secondary opening mechanism isn't exactly the best. So I was looking at a twin barrel weber but if they actually are crap on hills then I might have to look for something else. Is there any truth to this? Any ways to fix it?
Thanks.
Jackson.
|
|
|
|
 |
Gleam
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:04 am Posts: 18 Location: Bunno/Busso
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:10 am |
|
|
mm bit left field but I put on a 180 holley (very similar to weber 32/36..few weeks back - took it out for a run yesterday and although the power increase is awesome ...hit a dune that was 45 degrees and I was stranded - stalled multiple times -
|
|
|
|
 |
Built4thrashing
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 4972 Location: Dandenong .Vic
Vehicle: 1999 GV. Locked and Lifted
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:56 am |
|
Gleam wrote: mm bit left field but I put on a 180 holley (very similar to weber 32/36..few weeks back - took it out for a run yesterday and although the power increase is awesome ...hit a dune that was 45 degrees and I was stranded - stalled multiple times -
Needs to be turned around 90* and tuned better. My old weber would run all all but the most stupid angles. was as good as the stock carby i had.
_________________ B4T
Built by me to be driven like a rental
|
|
|
|
 |
Jackson
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:56 am Posts: 559 Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: Yellow Ute
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:14 am |
|
|
So the way they mount the fuel bowl is on one side or something?
|
|
|
|
 |
Built4thrashing
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 4972 Location: Dandenong .Vic
Vehicle: 1999 GV. Locked and Lifted
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 11:07 am |
|
|
|
 |
skyman
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:06 pm Posts: 1328 Location: Yakima, wa (us)
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:34 pm |
|
|
I ran several different 32/36 weber's with several different settings and tunes over two years. They really bring the suck off road.
One way they flood uphill,the other going down. I installed a fuel pump cut off to cut fuel when going downhill.
I was never so happy as when I bought a EFI conversion and installed it.
I will never run a weber again, maybe a CV or SU carb, but never a weber, ever.
|
|
|
|
 |
JrZook
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 5517 Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:42 pm |
|
|
Hey sky, you ever seen/heard of an adapter that mounts the weber 90 degrees to the intake manifold. This would make them on par with the stock carb off road.
_________________ Lil Foot!
http://tiny.cc/gtsw1
|
|
|
|
 |
skyman
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:06 pm Posts: 1328 Location: Yakima, wa (us)
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 2:17 pm |
|
|
I have not. I have only seen the ones that mount it either forward or reverse.
The problem would then be when you are off camber the fuel would pour down the throat from the float bowl vent.
I really think for price vs performance/reliability an SU, or CV carb is the way to go thee days. adapters are easily built a well.
|
|
|
|
 |
skyman
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:06 pm Posts: 1328 Location: Yakima, wa (us)
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 2:25 pm |
|
|
I guess i also wanted to say that weber are finicky. Too much pull on the throttle arms, and the bores around the butterfly's wear. That cause a vacuum leak, and a sticky pot in the throttle.
If you tighten them up to much the base warps, again causing the throttle plate to wear into the side of the carb.
They need very low pressure, but very high volume to work right. The idle jets are also easily plugged up.
At this point, and with all I have learned I would pass on a weber even if it were free. I would rather deal with a US spec Hitachi carb and all the associated electronics than a weber, and tat i saying a LOT.
Ten year ago it was a decent option to a dead worn stock carb, but now there are so many more options, and some that are less expensive. IMHO the weber's days in off road are over. Now on road is a different story, but they are just not worth the headaches for offroad vehicles.
I did get mine to run decent, but they never did run "right" for an entire trail run. Elevation was also a very big stumbling block for me. Raising over 3000ft per trip required some extensive adjustment, and even jet changet at the trail head.
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34842 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 2:36 pm |
|
|
has anyone ever heard of any one running a small side draft weber like a 40 DCOE chocked & jetted down to suit the 1.3?
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
skyman
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:06 pm Posts: 1328 Location: Yakima, wa (us)
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 3:08 pm |
|
Never seen a DCOE, but I did see a manifold for sale that etup two ide draft weber to the 13/1.6 8 valve manifold. I wa goign to picl itup, but it went out of my price range.
Heres a couple pics I found of said manifold.
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9 ... uJWnHXzCDA
|
|
|
|
 |
Jackson
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:56 am Posts: 559 Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: Yellow Ute
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 5:32 pm |
|
|
So side draft carbs don't suffer from angles?
Thanks for all this good stuff.
Jackson.
|
|
|
|
 |
fordem
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 2656 Location: Georgetown, Guyana
Vehicle: APK416, A6G415, A6N415
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 9:09 pm |
|
Jackson wrote: So side draft carbs don't suffer from angles?
Thanks for all this good stuff.
Jackson.
how did you arrive at that conclusion?
|
|
|
|
 |
Jackson
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:56 am Posts: 559 Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: Yellow Ute
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:37 pm |
|
fordem wrote: Jackson wrote: So side draft carbs don't suffer from angles?
Thanks for all this good stuff.
Jackson. how did you arrive at that conclusion?
It's not really a conclusion since I put the question mark but old mate that's posted above me was gunna buy the two side draft ones and he said the webers were crap on angles so there had to be some reason he was gunna buy them.
|
|
|
|
 |
JrZook
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 5517 Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:46 am |
|
Jackson wrote: fordem wrote: Jackson wrote: So side draft carbs don't suffer from angles?
Thanks for all this good stuff.
Jackson. how did you arrive at that conclusion? It's not really a conclusion since I put the question mark but old mate that's posted above me was gunna buy the two side draft ones and he said the webers were crap on angles so there had to be some reason he was gunna buy them.
A side draft with a centrally located fuel bowl, located directly under the throat will offer the best angle immunity eg: motorbike carbs
_________________ Lil Foot!
http://tiny.cc/gtsw1
|
|
|
|
 |
shakes
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 4895 Location: Northcote
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:32 am |
|
atari4x4 wrote: has anyone ever heard of any one running a small side draft weber like a 40 DCOE chocked & jetted down to suit the 1.3?
A mate has a carb, i was pondering the other day if i could be assed making a manifold to suit
|
|
|
|
 |
Santos
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1009 Location: Sydney -ish
Vehicle: 92 Suzuki Sierra
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:52 am |
|
|
|
 |
JrZook
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 5517 Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:15 am |
|
|
Hey Santos, I do recall you put up an awesome link to some yank site thread on carb performance in which they actually tested them on a dyno. Do you remember that one? Still got the link? It was a bloody good read with real figures to support it!
_________________ Lil Foot!
http://tiny.cc/gtsw1
|
|
|
|
 |
Santos
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1009 Location: Sydney -ish
Vehicle: 92 Suzuki Sierra
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:23 am |
|
|
No completely forgot about it... was it here or outers? Being a low volume poster i could probably find it if i was the author
_________________ -Santos
|
|
|
|
 |
JrZook
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 5517 Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:42 am |
|
Santos wrote: No completely forgot about it... was it here or outers? Being a low volume poster i could probably find it if i was the author
I was on here
_________________ Lil Foot!
http://tiny.cc/gtsw1
|
|
|
|
 |
sogone

az supporter
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:29 am Posts: 2070 Location: Darwin
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 3:06 am |
|
|
|
 |
Jackson
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:56 am Posts: 559 Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: Yellow Ute
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 3:32 am |
|
|
Would all Aisan carbs have the same base plate? How is the Sierra secondary activated?
Pretty much I wanna try get rid of this diaphram activation as mine is starting to go.
|
|
|
|
 |
Jackson
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:56 am Posts: 559 Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: Yellow Ute
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 3:33 am |
|
sogone wrote:
Would love to have the money to do that...
|
|
|
|
 |
JrZook
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 5517 Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 3:36 am |
|
sogone wrote:
That's the one! Real info and real figures  . I can see Sky has been all over it already 
_________________ Lil Foot!
http://tiny.cc/gtsw1
|
|
|
|
 |
skyman
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 2:06 pm Posts: 1328 Location: Yakima, wa (us)
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:00 am |
|
|
Yeah.. I am all about gettign as much out of these little Suzuki engines as possible ;D
I can tell you from personal experience a set of flat top High compression pistons in a 1.3 makes a BIG difference. If I hadn't stumbled on a 1.6 for $300 I would have been happy with the slightly built 1.3.
I don't know what your inlet manifolds look like, but there's alot of power to be pulled out of our carby manifolds. They are more restrictive than a tiny carb. I am not surprised a carb swap can near double the HP, I bet half of that increase is getting rid of the stock manifold.
|
|
|
|
 |
SSSIERA
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:26 pm Posts: 1770 Location: Perth's RUF
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:35 am |
|
|
_________________ THINKING BEFORE POSTING!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
shakes
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 4895 Location: Northcote
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:41 am |
|
|
ssssierra go get it tuned... over fueling = too much fuel use and stalling at idle, then when you finally hit a hill report back to us.
|
|
|
|
 |
Santos
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1009 Location: Sydney -ish
Vehicle: 92 Suzuki Sierra
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:49 am |
|
SSSIERA wrote:
Been there.
I had the speedo cable die on the morning of my test seven years ago.
Did the test in a sporty 4age toyota with a new clutch... 3 point turn was a nightmare. failed. fixed the speedo and and passed in my suzuki.
_________________ -Santos
|
|
|
|
 |
SSSIERA
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 1:26 pm Posts: 1770 Location: Perth's RUF
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:57 am |
|
|
i just spent 300bucks at my mechanic getting the POS tuned and having the dizzy replaced (that was not including new dizzy) aprently it was running bad coz the addaptor plate for the webber was a lil bent and it was sucking air in under the carby. 1hours worth of driving and now the POS wont idle again.
and the airfilter stinks of petrol
_________________ THINKING BEFORE POSTING!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
SierraDan

az supporter
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:55 pm Posts: 9348 Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: G13BB Jimny
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:02 am |
|
|
Wow. You pay way too much for shit.
Mine was tuned for 70bucks. and get a dizzy from the wreckers for cheap.
_________________ mlm
|
|
|
|
 |
|