| Author |
Message |
JonoW
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 35 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: Suzuki Sierra 1997
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:24 pm |
|
So researching different engine swaps for the sierra, and had a stupid idea...
Commondore V6 engine
... anyone think it could be possible? Without cutting/modding firewalls or chassis.
I see the americans have managed to put a V6 vortec engine into their samurais (but with an auto transmission, boooo) with whats seems to only be a body lift and transmission tunnel chop.
Would there be a short enough manual box to make this plausible?
On a side note i also found some guy who put a harley type vtwin into a samurai, how awesome would that sound?!
http://www.zukikrawlers.com/showthread.php?p=317282
|
|
|
|
 |
atari4x4

az supporter
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:30 pm Posts: 34842 Location: East Radelayed
Vehicle: SV420+SV620 Vitara's
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:33 pm |
|
|
yep, you're correct.... you had a stupid idea.
_________________ You're just hating because you don't understand
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:04 am |
|
Did someone set the clock on my computer back to 2001?
There have been many attempts at putting that steaming turd of an engine in a sierra. Yes, it's been done. No, it wasn't a good idea, nor will it ever be. Yes it can be made to fit. By the time you sort the rest of the driveline to deal with the torque it would have been better to have started with something with 300Nm from the beginning.
The most "successful" commodore engined sierras have ended up about the same size and weight as a hilux, or bigger. It's pretty hard to argue there was much point in building a "small, light" sierra with a V6 if it ends up as big and heavy as a car that was easier to put the motor into in the first place.
There's a good reason why these swaps are done with autos - autos are superior in off road conditions, and help to hold the driveline together by lessening shock load. If you want to build a car to compete in tough truck, go for it. don't be surprised if you are beaten by a 1.3/1.6 though, as history has proven.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
royce

omnipotent being
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 17216 Location: Pluto
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:08 am |
|
Gwagensteve wrote: don't be surprised if you are beaten by a 1.3 though, as history has proven.
Steve.
armsup
I like driving v6 sierras over stuff  though once its all done you really have something with bit of Sierra body left on it
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:16 am |
|
This had a V6 crummydore motor in it.
Absolutely ruined it!

_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
JonoW
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 35 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: Suzuki Sierra 1997
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:27 am |
|
haha i like atari's reply
yeah good point on the weight steve.
As far as torque problems what is it that will break, transfer case, drive shafts or diffs, or (D) All of the above?
How many extra torques can you get away with on the standard drivetrain?
Any opinions on a large Vtwin bike engine?
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:47 am |
|
|
300Nm will break everything. You need to "upgrade" to hilux transfer/diffs/driveshafts etc.
It's the gearing that's the killer - our cars can be pretty reliable at 90:1 gearing and 130Nm, but that's with CrMo axles etc.
Let's look at a large V-twin - a 2.0litre S&S Harley based motor.
Peak power - 115HP @ 5300 rpm, torque 135Nm
A G16B (Baleno) does 93HP and 130Nm for what, $1500?
The bigger problem with a harley bike motor is that the firing is very close together in the cycle, so the motor develops short term peak torque of up to 2400Nm. That's fine in a (very) traction limited bike, but run that in a car with gears and lockers and you are looking at breakage.
Plus you have to cool it and attach it to a gearbox with a reverse gear etc.
I've seen the yanks run Hayabusa motors with some success, but I don't think a V twin is a good solution for a 4WD.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
JonoW
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 35 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: Suzuki Sierra 1997
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:08 am |
|
Sounds like some very reasonable advice there steve, thanks.
Any reliability issues with the extra power from just a G16B then?
Another question  what engine is in the swift, M15A as far as I can tell??? Does that fit in a sierra?
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:20 am |
|
|
No, the G16B is a good straightforward swap. It provides adequate power without creating too many problems. There are good reasons why they are so popular.
An M15 can be made to work, but you will require lots of Jimny accessories to make it work. It's a good swap into a Jimny (although the M18 makes more sense) but you'd prettu much want an whole jimny engine, gearbox, loom and computer on top of the swift stuff to make an M13 work in a sierra.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:21 am |
|
|
what type of terrain do you like to drive mate? what is your zook?
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
JonoW
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 35 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: Suzuki Sierra 1997
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:26 am |
|
|
Ok, so fairly different gearbox mating from the G series to M series engines i suppose.
That's a shame, so many more crashed swifts around than G16B engined cars.
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:31 am |
|
|
m15a has been done tho, and from memory it bolts in.. just need to use a jim box.
_________________ Do cool stuff, Put it on the internet Sierra build, Jimny build https://www.youtube.com/user/redzook1
|
|
|
|
 |
JonoW
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 35 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: Suzuki Sierra 1997
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:39 am |
|
jonno_racing wrote: what type of terrain do you like to drive mate? what is your zook?
I have a coily. As far as terrain, done a few beach/fraser trips, lots of state forest runs (after its been raining  ) and a couple of the 4wd parks although i get over the rocky stuff pretty quick, and i have no roll bar yet so not the biggest fan of the steep stuff (you should try kenilworth for freaking steep hill, that SUCD!).
The wife drives it to work now and then though so it still needs to be daily drivable, highway is where it spends 80% of its time.
|
|
|
|
 |
JonoW
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 35 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: Suzuki Sierra 1997
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:43 am |
|
|
Is the jimny box same length? Could i get M series engine jimny box and leave transfer case back?
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:44 am |
|
If you want more power, just fit a G16B. I know its been done to death, but its the least intrusive path, which also makes it the most reliable. Not to mention it is also legal.
IMO I ruined my sierra by fitting that big heavy sack of shit motor. It became a trailer queen. It was great fun when you were driving up verticle walls, but unless all your mates have similar vehicles, it does get boring to drive hard track with them, when you only get a challenge from extreme tracks. 
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
JonoW
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 35 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: Suzuki Sierra 1997
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:58 am |
|
Fatzook wrote: If you want more power, just fit a G16B. I know its been done to death, but its the least intrusive path, which also makes it the most reliable. Not to mention it is also legal. IMO I ruined my sierra by fitting that big heavy sack of shit motor. It became a trailer queen. It was great fun when you were driving up verticle walls, but unless all your mates have similar vehicles, it does get boring to drive hard track with them, when you only get a challenge from extreme tracks. 
Yeah seems like all the advice points towards the G16B, just wondering now if could maybe do the M15A cheaper considering their seems to be quite a few crashed swifts around (I'm sure theres no correlation of female P plate drivers and number of crashed swifts  )
|
|
|
|
 |
Zook_Fan

az supporter
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 4531 Location: Toowoomba
Vehicle: Maruti and LJ80's
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:21 am |
|
Fatzook wrote: If you want more power, just fit a G16B. I know its been done to death, but its the least intrusive path, which also makes it the most reliable. Not to mention it is also legal. IMO I ruined my sierra by fitting that big heavy sack of shit motor. It became a trailer queen. It was great fun when you were driving up verticle walls, but unless all your mates have similar vehicles, it does get boring to drive hard track with them, when you only get a challenge from extreme tracks. 
So it made it capable enough that you could only get a challenge from extreme tracks but that's not a good thing 
|
|
|
|
 |
royce

omnipotent being
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 17216 Location: Pluto
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:26 am |
|
JonoW wrote: Fatzook wrote: If you want more power, just fit a G16B. I know its been done to death, but its the least intrusive path, which also makes it the most reliable. Not to mention it is also legal. IMO I ruined my sierra by fitting that big heavy sack of shit motor. It became a trailer queen. It was great fun when you were driving up verticle walls, but unless all your mates have similar vehicles, it does get boring to drive hard track with them, when you only get a challenge from extreme tracks.  Yeah seems like all the advice points towards the G16B, just wondering now if could maybe do the M15A cheaper considering their seems to be quite a few crashed swifts around (I'm sure theres no correlation of female P plate drivers and number of crashed swifts  )
The M15 is a great idea on something like a Jimny that already has everything else setup to suit an M series engine but into a Sierra youll have to deal with the gearbox (Jimnny box with a Sierra rear grafted) on it as well as sorting out the wiring (Swift ECU has its immobiliser in the body control module) so it seems the easy way out is using Jimny M13 stuff (still immobilised but seperate box)
So then an M18 looks good cause the wiring might be easier but its still going to be a real headache
|
|
|
|
 |
Ben_Sierra

az supporter
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 4472 Location: Perth
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:29 am |
|
|
Its a false economy looking at an M series motor because they are more readily available.
The motor is only one part of an engine conversion.
The extra fabrication, work and general messing around that will come with trying to put a slightly cheaper motor in will end up costing you more time, money and headaches in the long run.
_________________ I want my old sig back 
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:25 am |
|
Zook_Fan wrote: So it made it capable enough that you could only get a challenge from extreme tracks but that's not a good thing 
I think that's "on balance" - if it's a trailer queen, dragging it out to the few tracks where you can enjoy its strengths only seeks to highlight its weaknesses - everyone else there with you is working a bit harder on the same track but they drove there and back and fad fun on all the tracks on the way to the hard track.
Experience with the Vic club has taught me that the most fun is had when there are a bunch of reasonably similar setups. Having one car, for instance, that's massively more stable and can drive any line actually gets pretty boring - this was Mock's experience once he had finished Critta. With MK front springs all round, 3/4 rear, welded/welded, 36" swampers and no body to worry about, trips became kind of point-and-shoot. I know it sounds perfect, but in reality it's boring trailering something like that everywhere for 5 minutes of good driving.
Mock's next off road car was a 1.0 trayback on 31's and a welded front diff - It was heaps of fun - on balance more fun than Critta.
It's one of the reasons "capability" needs to be assessed as more than just what line you can take on what track. Right now I'm happy with the capability of the cars around me in the club in our hard terrain, so I want to work on better handling so I can have more fun on fast dirt, and be able to carry more speed up some of our greasy hills.
Just some thoughts. 140Kw/300Nm might be an answer to a question nobody really wanted answered in a sierra, regardless of how good an idea it looks.
|
|
|
|
 |
Zook_Fan

az supporter
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 4531 Location: Toowoomba
Vehicle: Maruti and LJ80's
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:01 am |
|
|
I agree that if it is just a social rig than you need others to have fun with it but if you are looking at competitions which has been mentioned in this thread being better than everyone else is a good thing.
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13007 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:11 am |
|
|
True, the question is is a sierra with a V6 better than a hilux with a V6... or a patrol with a V8? Probably not. I know which is more work though, and has more chance of failure.
Comps aren't anything like the real world. When building for a comp it's all about building within/around the rules and the terrain, which is normally pretty well known. That tends to limit the range of builds that are competitive.
Example - Tuff truck is basically a high traction event - so moderate HP can work with light weight. Winch challenge is a low traction event (with retarded rules) so compression travel and high HP is required.
As an example, a V6 is no real advantage for Tuff truck, but a Sierra is a disadvantage for winch challenge.
Once you go down the slippery slope of comps though, you're pretty much massively limiting the amount of seat time you can get in the car per year. In some cases (depending on what you build) you could be left with minutes per year of drive time.
Seems a bit dumb.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
jimnydude
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:41 am Posts: 11 Location: perth wa
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:27 am |
|
|
g16 in my jimny went from 51 to 86 hp at wheels no other changes only motor
_________________ get down with the dirty little zukes
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:06 am |
|
Zook_Fan wrote: Fatzook wrote: If you want more power, just fit a G16B. I know its been done to death, but its the least intrusive path, which also makes it the most reliable. Not to mention it is also legal.
IMO I ruined my sierra by fitting that big heavy sack of shit motor. It became a trailer queen. It was great fun when you were driving up verticle walls, but unless all your mates have similar vehicles, it does get boring to drive hard track with them, when you only get a challenge from extreme tracks. :? So it made it capable enough that you could only get a challenge from extreme tracks but that's not a good thing 
Thought I was quite clear on this point. 
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
Zook_Fan

az supporter
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 4531 Location: Toowoomba
Vehicle: Maruti and LJ80's
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:10 am |
|
Fatzook wrote: Zook_Fan wrote: Fatzook wrote: If you want more power, just fit a G16B. I know its been done to death, but its the least intrusive path, which also makes it the most reliable. Not to mention it is also legal.
IMO I ruined my sierra by fitting that big heavy sack of shit motor. It became a trailer queen. It was great fun when you were driving up verticle walls, but unless all your mates have similar vehicles, it does get boring to drive hard track with them, when you only get a challenge from extreme tracks. :? So it made it capable enough that you could only get a challenge from extreme tracks but that's not a good thing  Thought I was quite clear on this point. 
Just because you don't have mates that have similar vehicles doesn't mean the OP doesn't.
|
|
|
|
 |
Fatzook

az supporter
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:30 pm Posts: 14977 Location: The Hills
Vehicle: Vitara, NGV
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:20 am |
|
Zook_Fan wrote: Fatzook wrote: Zook_Fan wrote: Fatzook wrote: If you want more power, just fit a G16B. I know its been done to death, but its the least intrusive path, which also makes it the most reliable. Not to mention it is also legal.
IMO I ruined my sierra by fitting that big heavy sack of shit motor. It became a trailer queen. It was great fun when you were driving up verticle walls, but unless all your mates have similar vehicles, it does get boring to drive hard track with them, when you only get a challenge from extreme tracks. :? So it made it capable enough that you could only get a challenge from extreme tracks but that's not a good thing  Thought I was quite clear on this point.  Just because you don't have mates that have similar vehicles doesn't mean the OP doesn't.
Well if you read my post properly instead of ommitting things, you'll find that I said "unless all your mates have similar vehicles". This allows the OP to apply my comments to his own situation if he feels the need to do so.
My comments were/are based on my own experiences with this ACTUAL conversion, not internet rumours and bandwagonism ( may not be an actual word  ).
EDIT: Oh, and for the record, the engine swap did not make it more capable. The coilovers, bundera diffs, auto and 36" tyres did. All of these mods ( save for the tyres and V6) were still civilised enough to allow it to be street driven, and did not effect handling at all.
_________________ 2013 GV 1998 SV420 ute
|
|
|
|
 |
SierraDan

az supporter
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:55 pm Posts: 9348 Location: Newcastle
Vehicle: G13BB Jimny
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:25 am |
|
Zook_Fan wrote: Fatzook wrote: Zook_Fan wrote: Fatzook wrote: If you want more power, just fit a G16B. I know its been done to death, but its the least intrusive path, which also makes it the most reliable. Not to mention it is also legal.
IMO I ruined my sierra by fitting that big heavy sack of shit motor. It became a trailer queen. It was great fun when you were driving up verticle walls, but unless all your mates have similar vehicles, it does get boring to drive hard track with them, when you only get a challenge from extreme tracks. :? So it made it capable enough that you could only get a challenge from extreme tracks but that's not a good thing  Thought I was quite clear on this point.  Just because you don't have mates that have similar vehicles doesn't mean the OP doesn't.
I reckon I have heaps more fun than my mates on 35-38" tyres locked and geared. They seem to just crawl effortlessly everywhere without lifting a wheel.
_________________ mlm
|
|
|
|
 |
JonoW
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 35 Location: Brisbane
Vehicle: Suzuki Sierra 1997
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:54 pm |
|
|
Just to finish up this thread, i have taken the good advice given here and bought a baleno (g16b) 1500bucks 170000kms, not the bargain of the century but should have almost everything i need.
|
|
|
|
 |
shakes
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 11:30 pm Posts: 4895 Location: Northcote
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:24 pm |
|
Nice to see someone taking the advice given 
|
|
|
|
 |
jonno_racing

az supporter
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 8164 Location: Tassie
Vehicle: suzuki
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:20 am |
|
|
|
 |
|