| Author |
Message |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:40 am |
|
|
I'm in the process of doing a RUF conversion and currently have my leaf springs apart for a service. The driver side spring has 20mm more camber (arch) than the passenger side. Will that be enough?
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
stockman

az supporter
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 5319 Location: Canberra
Vehicle: 4wd
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:42 am |
|
|
Could you just RUF one side, similar to how you did the virtual lift?
_________________ Watch out or you'll get sued.
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:46 am |
|
stockman wrote: Could you just RUF one side, similar to how you did the virtual lift?
Err, no.
I've VL'd the front both sides, just not the rear.
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
steak_knife

az supporter
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 21335 Location: Smart Ass Island
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:49 am |
|
Damo wrote: stockman wrote: Could you just RUF one side, similar to how you did the virtual lift? Err, no. I've VL'd the front both sides, just not the rear.
Sorry bout that Damo.. 
_________________ I used to be indecisive,
now I'm not so sure.....
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:56 am |
|
steak_knife wrote: Damo wrote: stockman wrote: Could you just RUF one side, similar to how you did the virtual lift? Err, no. I've VL'd the front both sides, just not the rear. Sorry bout that Damo.. 
What did I miss? 
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
alien
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:30 pm Posts: 16343 Location: Perth
Vehicle: '92 Sierra, 1.6efi, SPOA, 31s.
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:57 am |
|
|
put a cut down bit of leaf spring in the passengers side packs to lower it =)
_________________ 
|
|
|
|
 |
Rusho

Tubby Elfsdong
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 6501 Location: Northside, Brisbane
Vehicle: Coily Sierra
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 6:10 am |
|
|
_________________ Shep is a closet jimny lover!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
royce

omnipotent being
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 17216 Location: Pluto
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 6:11 am |
|
|
I cant remember how much more I used to put in mine but I guess if most lean 20mm then that should cover it
|
|
|
|
 |
zooktastic
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 941 Location: west sydney
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 6:48 am |
|
i jsut let it happen and pretend not to notice it when everyone points it out 
|
|
|
|
 |
Built4thrashing
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 4972 Location: Dandenong .Vic
Vehicle: 1999 GV. Locked and Lifted
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:38 am |
|
|
The only real way to fix the sierra lean is to get a 3rd biggest leaf that is slightly thicker and use that. You dont need any more leaves on the drivers side like some people run.
Adding an extra leaf just makes that side stiffer and it wont flex as well.
Re-setting the drivers side pack with more arch will fix the leaf but it will eventually sag and the lean will come back.
The thicker leaf gives it a slightle high load rating but its not enough to limit flex. I ran my sierra like this for 4 years and it never developed the lean again but still flexed like a bamboo shoot.
_________________ B4T
Built by me to be driven like a rental
|
|
|
|
 |
ajsr

az supporter
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 10:30 pm Posts: 3712 Location: melb
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:42 am |
|
just drive it you bitch

|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:47 am |
|
ajsr wrote: just drive it you fat bitch
Fixed 
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:49 am |
|
Built4thrashing wrote: The only real way to fix the sierra lean is to get a 3rd biggest leaf that is slightly thicker and use that. You dont need any more leaves on the drivers side like some people run.
Adding an extra leaf just makes that side stiffer and it wont flex as well.
Re-setting the drivers side pack with more arch will fix the leaf but it will eventually sag and the lean will come back.
The thicker leaf gives it a slightle high load rating but its not enough to limit flex. I ran my sierra like this for 4 years and it never developed the lean again but still flexed like a bamboo shoot.
How many leaves in the front pack did you run?
The springs I have are 3 + overload. I've taken the overload out which leaves me with 3.. err, leaves.
So you'd change out the smallest leaf for a slightly thicker one?
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
just_cruizin

az supporter
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 2867 Location: here
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 7:58 am |
|
|
Full or half RUF.
Have you done it yet? If not just push the front hanger forward a bit
_________________ greenzook89 wrote: 31zook wrote: Makes me want something similar
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 8:22 am |
|
just_cruizin wrote: Full or half RUF. Have you done it yet? If not just push the front hanger forward a bit
Are you trying to annoy Royce? He hates the full/half RUF nomenclature.
BUT, if you've seen my fab work you'll agree full RUF  i'm moving the rear hanger and the front hanger.
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
Built4thrashing
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 4972 Location: Dandenong .Vic
Vehicle: 1999 GV. Locked and Lifted
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 8:37 am |
|
Damo wrote: Built4thrashing wrote: The only real way to fix the sierra lean is to get a 3rd biggest leaf that is slightly thicker and use that. You dont need any more leaves on the drivers side like some people run.
Adding an extra leaf just makes that side stiffer and it wont flex as well.
Re-setting the drivers side pack with more arch will fix the leaf but it will eventually sag and the lean will come back.
The thicker leaf gives it a slightle high load rating but its not enough to limit flex. I ran my sierra like this for 4 years and it never developed the lean again but still flexed like a bamboo shoot. How many leaves in the front pack did you run? The springs I have are 3 + overload. I've taken the overload out which leaves me with 3.. err, leaves. So you'd change out the smallest leaf for a slightly thicker one?
I used to run 4 leaves front and rear with a small load leaf in the back. But my packs were custom made with 3/4 length military wrap 2nd leaves. Worked well with my setup.
_________________ B4T
Built by me to be driven like a rental
|
|
|
|
 |
2stroker
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 2689 Location: North Brisbane
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 11:45 am |
|
|
I have never owned a sierra that leans, if I did I would not consider runing more leaves one side than the other that is crazy.
|
|
|
|
 |
JrZook
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 5517 Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 11:53 am |
|
2stroker wrote: I have never owned a sierra that leans, if I did I would not consider runing more leaves one side than the other that is crazy.
Why is that crazy? I have it and I'm sure as hell not crazy, neither is the road manners of my vehicle.
_________________ Lil Foot!
http://tiny.cc/gtsw1
|
|
|
|
 |
Hybrid

az supporter
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 1095 Location: Bulimba, Brisbane
Vehicle: '92 Sierra
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 12:45 am |
|
|
I run it and I am crazy. So based on the sample group there's a 50/50 chance you'll be crazy if you do it damo.
I had to run an additional leaf in my front drivers side pack but I haven't noticed any difference in flex from either side but at the moment I don't get full droop due to the bushes binding. I might notice it once that is sorted.
|
|
|
|
 |
31zook
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 9242 Location: maito
Vehicle: <3 Edna <3
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 12:55 am |
|
|
I set my DS front spring hanger 8mm further forward to try and help the lean. now my shackles are uneven and it annoys me ever time i see it. I run an extra medium leaf on the DS and that fixed it.
|
|
|
|
 |
mnemonix

az supporter
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:30 pm Posts: 1409 Location: Newcastle NSW
Vehicle: '96 LWB trayback
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 1:33 am |
|
31zook wrote: I set my DS front spring hanger 8mm further forward to try and help the lean. now my shackles are uneven and it annoys me ever time i see it.
Same here. Now I have no lean but the shackles are noticeably different and it annoys the piss out of me.
For my zook that spends more time parked than driven, it's important. 
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13008 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 1:40 am |
|
|
I was interested to note that the 2012 Nissan GT-R runs different spring rates right to left and even different suspension pivot points on each side due to one side being heavier than the other.
I'll stand by running a heavier spring rate on the heavy side being an acceptable fix. If you think about it, the heavier side will impart more force on the spring when it encounters a bump so if you have the same rate left and right the right hand side will compress more.
The only way to have the right and left side compress the same amount when encountering the same bump is to run more rate on the right to compensate. More camber will correct the lean but will compress more readily.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
JrZook
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 5517 Location: Holland Park
Vehicle: Awesome!!
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 2:53 am |
|
Gwagensteve wrote: I was interested to note that the 2012 Nissan GT-R runs different spring rates right to left and even different suspension pivot points on each side due to one side being heavier than the other.
I'll stand by running a heavier spring rate on the heavy side being an acceptable fix. If you think about it, the heavier side will impart more force on the spring when it encounters a bump so if you have the same rate left and right the right hand side will compress more.
The only way to have the right and left side compress the same amount when encountering the same bump is to run more rate on the right to compensate. More camber will correct the lean but will compress more readily.
Steve.
Exactly my thoughts!
_________________ Lil Foot!
http://tiny.cc/gtsw1
|
|
|
|
 |
Damo

az supporter
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 4661 Location: Brisbane
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:07 pm |
|
JrZook wrote: Gwagensteve wrote: I was interested to note that the 2012 Nissan GT-R runs different spring rates right to left and even different suspension pivot points on each side due to one side being heavier than the other.
I'll stand by running a heavier spring rate on the heavy side being an acceptable fix. If you think about it, the heavier side will impart more force on the spring when it encounters a bump so if you have the same rate left and right the right hand side will compress more.
The only way to have the right and left side compress the same amount when encountering the same bump is to run more rate on the right to compensate. More camber will correct the lean but will compress more readily.
Steve. Exactly my thoughts! Initially I hadn't considered this concept but after Steve mentioned it, it all makes a lot of sense. Consider what I have now, you have the same rate spring on both sides but the weight is not evenly distributed (eg, if you weighed the vehicle at each tyre the driver's side would weigh more than the passenger side). Now think about rounding a long sweeping bend at highway speeds. Mine currently leans a lot more when going around a left hand sweeper compared to a right hand sweeper. That is because the driver's side spring is trying to control more weight with the same rate. The solution? Even out the driver's/passenger side weight distribution OR put a higher rate spring on the heavy side. Oh, and FYI. Going back to my original question... Damo wrote: I'm in the process of doing a RUF conversion and currently have my leaf springs apart for a service. The driver side spring has 20mm more camber (arch) than the passenger side. Will that be enough?
Now that i've done the conversion and have the springs in place I can tell you without a doubt that, no, 20mm is not enough 
_________________ SJ50.4.LYF
|
|
|
|
 |
rick1970
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:39 pm Posts: 303 Location: Dungowan
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:11 am |
|
When i did my RUF, i made up 5 leaf packs with all the leaves with the most camber used on the DS. DS pack had nearly 1" more static camber then the PS pack.
It still sits low on the DS
Extra leaf in the DS pack seems to be a good idea.
|
|
|
|
 |
GRPABT1
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:30 pm Posts: 731 Location: Townsville
Vehicle: 88 SWB WT Sierra soft top ute
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:18 am |
|
|
The only perfect fix is to transfer as much weight to the passenger side as you can. Think of this when placing batteries, spare tyres, compressors etc.
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13008 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:53 am |
|
GRPABT1 wrote: The only perfect fix is to transfer as much weight to the passenger side as you can. Think of this when placing batteries, spare tyres, compressors etc.
Eggzactly.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
2stroker
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:30 pm Posts: 2689 Location: North Brisbane
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 10:03 am |
|
|
There is a difference between different rates and different amount of leaves, all decent suzuki springs are marked right and left for the front because they are different rates to start with.
I am no expert but then again neither are any of you, speak to some suspension experts and ask them if it is good practice.
A 2012 Nissan GT-R may run a different rate one side to the other, but the coil spring still has the same amount of coils left to right.
You wouldn't run the drivers side tyre at 40psi and the passenger side at 10psi to eliminate the lean.........same theory.
|
|
|
|
 |
Gwagensteve
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:30 pm Posts: 13008 Location: Melbourne
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:32 pm |
|
|
No it's not 2 stroker and you know that.
It doesn't matter how more rate is achieved - thicker leaves, more leaves - meh - more weight requires more rate not more camber.
Steve.
|
|
|
|
 |
TZAR

az supporter
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 3461 Location: licking some windows
Vehicle: LJ20 LJ50
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:05 pm |
|
|
Just lead fill the bottom of the passenger door.
_________________ Camels have nice toes
|
|
|
|
 |
|